From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
Richard Herbert <rherbert@sympatico.ca>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Get root level from walkers when retrieving MMIO SPTE
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:31:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201218003139.2167891-3-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201218003139.2167891-1-seanjc@google.com>
Get the so called "root" level from the low level shadow page table
walkers instead of manually attempting to calculate it higher up the
stack, e.g. in get_mmio_spte(). When KVM is using PAE shadow paging,
the starting level of the walk, from the callers perspective, is not
the CR3 root but rather the PDPTR "root". Checking for reserved bits
from the CR3 root causes get_mmio_spte() to consume uninitialized stack
data due to indexing into sptes[] for a level that was not filled by
get_walk(). This can result in false positives and/or negatives
depending on what garbage happens to be on the stack.
Opportunistically nuke a few extra newlines.
Fixes: 95fb5b0258b7 ("kvm: x86/mmu: Support MMIO in the TDP MMU")
Reported-by: Richard Herbert <rherbert@sympatico.ca>
Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 15 ++++++---------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 5 ++++-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h | 4 +++-
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index a48cd12c01d7..52f36c879086 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -3485,16 +3485,16 @@ static bool mmio_info_in_cache(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, bool direct)
* Return the level of the lowest level SPTE added to sptes.
* That SPTE may be non-present.
*/
-static int get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes)
+static int get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes, int *root_level)
{
struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator iterator;
int leaf = -1;
u64 spte;
-
walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin(vcpu);
- for (shadow_walk_init(&iterator, vcpu, addr);
+ for (shadow_walk_init(&iterator, vcpu, addr),
+ *root_level = iterator.level;
shadow_walk_okay(&iterator);
__shadow_walk_next(&iterator, spte)) {
leaf = iterator.level;
@@ -3504,7 +3504,6 @@ static int get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes)
if (!is_shadow_present_pte(spte))
break;
-
}
walk_shadow_page_lockless_end(vcpu);
@@ -3517,9 +3516,7 @@ static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
{
u64 sptes[PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL];
struct rsvd_bits_validate *rsvd_check;
- int root = vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_root_level;
- int leaf;
- int level;
+ int root, leaf, level;
bool reserved = false;
if (!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa)) {
@@ -3528,9 +3525,9 @@ static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
}
if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
- leaf = kvm_tdp_mmu_get_walk(vcpu, addr, sptes);
+ leaf = kvm_tdp_mmu_get_walk(vcpu, addr, sptes, &root);
else
- leaf = get_walk(vcpu, addr, sptes);
+ leaf = get_walk(vcpu, addr, sptes, &root);
if (unlikely(leaf < 0)) {
*sptep = 0ull;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 50cec7a15ddb..a4f9447f8327 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1148,13 +1148,16 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_write_protect_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
* Return the level of the lowest level SPTE added to sptes.
* That SPTE may be non-present.
*/
-int kvm_tdp_mmu_get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes)
+int kvm_tdp_mmu_get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes,
+ int *root_level)
{
struct tdp_iter iter;
struct kvm_mmu *mmu = vcpu->arch.mmu;
gfn_t gfn = addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
int leaf = -1;
+ *root_level = vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_root_level;
+
tdp_mmu_for_each_pte(iter, mmu, gfn, gfn + 1) {
leaf = iter.level;
sptes[leaf - 1] = iter.old_spte;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
index 556e065503f6..cbbdbadd1526 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
@@ -44,5 +44,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
bool kvm_tdp_mmu_write_protect_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
-int kvm_tdp_mmu_get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes);
+int kvm_tdp_mmu_get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes,
+ int *root_level);
+
#endif /* __KVM_X86_MMU_TDP_MMU_H */
--
2.29.2.684.gfbc64c5ab5-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-18 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-18 0:31 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug fixes and cleanups in get_mmio_spte() Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18 0:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Use -1 to flag an undefined spte " Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18 8:58 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-12-21 17:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18 0:31 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-12-18 9:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Get root level from walkers when retrieving MMIO SPTE Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-12-21 18:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-12-21 18:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18 0:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Use raw level to index into MMIO walks' sptes array Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18 9:18 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-12-18 0:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize not-present/MMIO SPTE check in get_mmio_spte() Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18 9:33 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
[not found] ` <2346556.XAFRqVoOGU@starbug.dom>
2020-12-18 1:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug fixes and cleanups " Richard Herbert
2020-12-21 18:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201218003139.2167891-3-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rherbert@sympatico.ca \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome