From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
Richard Herbert <rherbert@sympatico.ca>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize not-present/MMIO SPTE check in get_mmio_spte()
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:31:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201218003139.2167891-5-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201218003139.2167891-1-seanjc@google.com>
Check only the terminal leaf for a "!PRESENT || MMIO" SPTE when looking
for reserved bits on valid, non-MMIO SPTEs. The get_walk() helpers
terminate their walks if a not-present or MMIO SPTE is encountered, i.e.
the non-terminal SPTEs have already been verified to be regular SPTEs.
This eliminates an extra check-and-branch in a relatively hot loop.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 4798a4472066..769855f5f0a1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -3511,7 +3511,7 @@ static int get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes, int *root_level
return leaf;
}
-/* return true if reserved bit is detected on spte. */
+/* return true if reserved bit(s) are detected on a valid, non-MMIO SPTE. */
static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
{
u64 sptes[PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL + 1];
@@ -3534,11 +3534,20 @@ static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
return reserved;
}
+ *sptep = sptes[leaf];
+
+ /*
+ * Skip reserved bits checks on the terminal leaf if it's not a valid
+ * SPTE. Note, this also (intentionally) skips MMIO SPTEs, which, by
+ * design, always have reserved bits set. The purpose of the checks is
+ * to detect reserved bits on non-MMIO SPTEs. i.e. buggy SPTEs.
+ */
+ if (!is_shadow_present_pte(sptes[leaf]))
+ leaf++;
+
rsvd_check = &vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_zero_check;
- for (level = root; level >= leaf; level--) {
- if (!is_shadow_present_pte(sptes[level]))
- break;
+ for (level = root; level >= leaf; level--)
/*
* Use a bitwise-OR instead of a logical-OR to aggregate the
* reserved bit and EPT's invalid memtype/XWR checks to avoid
@@ -3546,7 +3555,6 @@ static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
*/
reserved |= __is_bad_mt_xwr(rsvd_check, sptes[level]) |
__is_rsvd_bits_set(rsvd_check, sptes[level], level);
- }
if (reserved) {
pr_err("%s: detect reserved bits on spte, addr 0x%llx, dump hierarchy:\n",
@@ -3556,8 +3564,6 @@ static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
sptes[level], level);
}
- *sptep = sptes[leaf];
-
return reserved;
}
--
2.29.2.684.gfbc64c5ab5-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-18 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-18 0:31 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug fixes and cleanups " Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18 0:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Use -1 to flag an undefined spte " Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18 8:58 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-12-21 17:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18 0:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Get root level from walkers when retrieving MMIO SPTE Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18 9:10 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-12-21 18:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-12-21 18:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18 0:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Use raw level to index into MMIO walks' sptes array Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18 9:18 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-12-18 0:31 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-12-18 9:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize not-present/MMIO SPTE check in get_mmio_spte() Vitaly Kuznetsov
[not found] ` <2346556.XAFRqVoOGU@starbug.dom>
2020-12-18 1:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug fixes and cleanups " Richard Herbert
2020-12-21 18:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201218003139.2167891-5-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rherbert@sympatico.ca \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome