From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-tcp: Check if request has started before processing it
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:40:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210215104020.yyithlo2hkxqvguj@beryllium.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73e4914e-f867-c899-954d-4b61ae2b4c33@suse.de>
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 09:46:41AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 2/12/21 10:49 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> >
> > > > > blk_mq_tag_to_rq() will always return a request if the command_id is
> > > > > in the valid range. Check if the request has been started. If we
> > > > > blindly process the request we might double complete a request which
> > > > > can be fatal.
> > > >
> > > > How did you get to this one? did the controller send a completion for
> > > > a completed/bogus request?
> > >
> > > If that is the case, then that must mean it's possible the driver could
> > > have started the command id just before the bogus completion check. Data
> > > iorruption, right?
'during TCP LIF toggles and aggr relocates' testing the host
crashes. TBH, I do not really know what is happening or what the test
does. Still trying to figure out what's going on. I was just very
surprised how much the code trusts the other side to behave correctly.
> > Yes, which is why I don't think this check is very useful..
>
> I actually view that as a valid protection against spoofed frames.
> Without it it's easy to crash the machine by injecting fake completions with
> random command ids.
In this test scenario it's not even a spoofed frame; maybe just a
confused controller.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-15 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-12 18:17 Daniel Wagner
2021-02-12 20:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-12 21:09 ` Keith Busch
2021-02-12 21:49 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-13 8:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-02-15 10:40 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2021-02-15 21:29 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-26 12:35 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-02-26 12:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-02-26 16:13 ` Keith Busch
2021-02-26 16:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-02-26 17:19 ` Keith Busch
2021-03-01 13:26 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-03-01 13:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-03-01 16:05 ` Keith Busch
2021-03-01 16:53 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-03-01 20:59 ` Keith Busch
2021-03-02 7:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-03-02 18:45 ` Keith Busch
2021-02-15 21:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-16 8:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-02-13 8:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210215104020.yyithlo2hkxqvguj@beryllium.lan \
--to=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®