mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [patch 7/8] x86/fpu: Clean up the fpu__clear() variants
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 11:55:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210602101619.066082349@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210602095543.149814064@linutronix.de>

From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>

fpu__clear() currently resets both register state and kernel XSAVE buffer
state.  It has two modes: one for all state (supervisor and user) and
another for user state only.  fpu__clear_all() uses the "all state"
(user_only=0) mode, while a number of signal paths use the user_only=1
mode.

Make fpu__clear() work only for user state (user_only=1) and remove the
"all state" (user_only=0) code.  Rename it to match so it can be used by
the signal paths.

Replace the "all state" (user_only=0) fpu__clear() functionality.  Use the
TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD functionality instead of making any actual hardware
registers changes in this path.

[ Changelog polished by Dave Hansen ]

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c |   62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
@@ -354,45 +354,67 @@ static inline void copy_init_fpstate_to_
 }
 
 /*
- * Clear the FPU state back to init state.
- *
- * Called by sys_execve(), by the signal handler code and by various
- * error paths.
+ * Reset current's user FPU states to the init states.  current's
+ * supervisor states, if any, are not modified by this function.  The
+ * caller guarantees that the XSTATE header in memory is intact.
  */
-static void fpu__clear(struct fpu *fpu, bool user_only)
+void fpu__clear_user_states(struct fpu *fpu)
 {
 	WARN_ON_FPU(fpu != &current->thread.fpu);
 
 	if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU)) {
-		fpu__drop(fpu);
-		fpu__initialize(fpu);
+		fpu__clear_all(fpu);
 		return;
 	}
 
 	fpregs_lock();
 
-	if (user_only) {
-		if (!fpregs_state_valid(fpu, smp_processor_id()) &&
-		    xfeatures_mask_supervisor())
-			copy_kernel_to_xregs(&fpu->state.xsave,
-					     xfeatures_mask_supervisor());
-		copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs(xfeatures_mask_user());
-	} else {
-		copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs(xfeatures_mask_all);
+	/*
+	 * Ensure that current's supervisor states are loaded into
+	 * their corresponding registers.
+	 */
+	if (xfeatures_mask_supervisor() &&
+	    !fpregs_state_valid(fpu, smp_processor_id())) {
+		copy_kernel_to_xregs(&fpu->state.xsave,
+				     xfeatures_mask_supervisor());
 	}
 
+	/* Reset user states in registers. */
+	copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs(xfeatures_mask_user());
+
+	/*
+	 * Now all FPU registers have their desired values.  Inform the
+	 * FPU state machine that current's FPU registers are in the
+	 * hardware registers.
+	 */
 	fpregs_mark_activate();
+
 	fpregs_unlock();
 }
 
-void fpu__clear_user_states(struct fpu *fpu)
-{
-	fpu__clear(fpu, true);
-}
 
+/*
+ * Reset current's FPU registers (user and supervisor) to their INIT values.
+ * This is used by execve(); out of an abundance of caution, it completely
+ * wipes and resets the XSTATE buffer in memory.
+ *
+ * Note that XSAVE (unlike XSAVES) expects the XSTATE buffer in memory to
+ * be valid, so there are certain forms of corruption of the XSTATE buffer
+ * in memory that would survive initializing the FPU registers and XSAVEing
+ * them to memory.
+ */
 void fpu__clear_all(struct fpu *fpu)
 {
-	fpu__clear(fpu, false);
+	fpregs_lock();
+	fpu__drop(fpu);
+	/*
+	 * This does not change the actual hardware registers; when
+	 * fpu__clear_all() returns, TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD will be set, and a
+	 * subsequent exit to user mode will reload the hardware registers
+	 * from memory.
+	 */
+	fpu__initialize(fpu);
+	fpregs_unlock();
 }
 
 /*


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-02 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-02  9:55 [patch 0/8] x86/fpu: Mop up XSAVES and related damage Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-02  9:55 ` [patch 1/8] selftests/x86: Test signal frame XSTATE header corruption handling Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-02 12:38   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-02 14:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-03 13:16       ` Shuah Khan
2021-06-02 15:59   ` [patch V2 " Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-02 16:02     ` [patch V2a " Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-02  9:55 ` [patch 2/8] x86/fpu: Prevent state corruption in __fpu__restore_sig() Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-02 13:12   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-02 14:46     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-02 15:58   ` [patch V2 " Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-02  9:55 ` [patch 3/8] x86/fpu: Invalidate FPU state after a failed XRSTOR from a user buffer Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-02 15:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-03 17:30     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-03 19:28       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-02  9:55 ` [patch 4/8] x86/fpu: Limit xstate copy size in xstateregs_set() Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-02 17:44   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-02  9:55 ` [patch 5/8] x86/fpu: Sanitize xstateregs_set() Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-02 16:01   ` [patch V2 " Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-03 11:32     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-03 17:24   ` [patch " Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-02  9:55 ` [patch 6/8] x86/fpu: Add address range checks to copy_user_to_xstate() Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-02  9:55 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-06-02  9:55 ` [patch 8/8] x86/fpu: Deduplicate copy_xxx_to_xstate() Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-03 16:56   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-02 21:28 ` [patch 0/8] x86/fpu: Mop up XSAVES and related damage Yu, Yu-cheng
2021-06-04 14:05   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-04 16:27     ` Yu, Yu-cheng
2021-06-04 17:46     ` Dave Hansen
2021-06-04 18:14       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-04 22:04 ` Dave Hansen
2021-06-05 10:18   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-05 11:56     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210602101619.066082349@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome