From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: x86/pmu: Refactoring find_arch_event() to pmc_perf_hw_id()
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 15:42:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211130074221.93635-3-likexu@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211130074221.93635-1-likexu@tencent.com>
From: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
The find_arch_event() returns a "unsigned int" value,
which is used by the pmc_reprogram_counter() to
program a PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE type perf_event.
The returned value is actually the kernel defined gernic
perf_hw_id, let's rename it to pmc_perf_hw_id() with simpler
incoming parameters for better self-explanation.
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 8 +-------
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h | 3 +--
arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c | 8 ++++----
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 9 +++++----
4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 09873f6488f7..3b3ccf5b1106 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -174,7 +174,6 @@ static bool pmc_resume_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
void reprogram_gp_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 eventsel)
{
unsigned config, type = PERF_TYPE_RAW;
- u8 event_select, unit_mask;
struct kvm *kvm = pmc->vcpu->kvm;
struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *filter;
int i;
@@ -206,17 +205,12 @@ void reprogram_gp_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 eventsel)
if (!allow_event)
return;
- event_select = eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT;
- unit_mask = (eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK) >> 8;
-
if (!(eventsel & (ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EDGE |
ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INV |
ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_CMASK |
HSW_IN_TX |
HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED))) {
- config = kvm_x86_ops.pmu_ops->find_arch_event(pmc_to_pmu(pmc),
- event_select,
- unit_mask);
+ config = kvm_x86_ops.pmu_ops->pmc_perf_hw_id(pmc);
if (config != PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX)
type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
index 59d6b76203d5..dd7dbb1c5048 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
@@ -24,8 +24,7 @@ struct kvm_event_hw_type_mapping {
};
struct kvm_pmu_ops {
- unsigned (*find_arch_event)(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u8 event_select,
- u8 unit_mask);
+ unsigned int (*pmc_perf_hw_id)(struct kvm_pmc *pmc);
unsigned (*find_fixed_event)(int idx);
bool (*pmc_is_enabled)(struct kvm_pmc *pmc);
struct kvm_pmc *(*pmc_idx_to_pmc)(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
index 0cf05e4caa4c..fb0ce8cda8a7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
@@ -138,10 +138,10 @@ static inline struct kvm_pmc *get_gp_pmc_amd(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u32 msr,
return &pmu->gp_counters[msr_to_index(msr)];
}
-static unsigned amd_find_arch_event(struct kvm_pmu *pmu,
- u8 event_select,
- u8 unit_mask)
+static unsigned int amd_pmc_perf_hw_id(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
+ u8 event_select = pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT;
+ u8 unit_mask = (pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK) >> 8;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(amd_event_mapping); i++)
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static void amd_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
struct kvm_pmu_ops amd_pmu_ops = {
- .find_arch_event = amd_find_arch_event,
+ .pmc_perf_hw_id = amd_pmc_perf_hw_id,
.find_fixed_event = amd_find_fixed_event,
.pmc_is_enabled = amd_pmc_is_enabled,
.pmc_idx_to_pmc = amd_pmc_idx_to_pmc,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index b7ab5fd03681..67a0188ecdc5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -68,10 +68,11 @@ static void global_ctrl_changed(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u64 data)
reprogram_counter(pmu, bit);
}
-static unsigned intel_find_arch_event(struct kvm_pmu *pmu,
- u8 event_select,
- u8 unit_mask)
+static unsigned int intel_pmc_perf_hw_id(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
+ struct kvm_pmu *pmu = pmc_to_pmu(pmc);
+ u8 event_select = pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT;
+ u8 unit_mask = (pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK) >> 8;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(intel_arch_events); i++)
@@ -719,7 +720,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops = {
- .find_arch_event = intel_find_arch_event,
+ .pmc_perf_hw_id = intel_pmc_perf_hw_id,
.find_fixed_event = intel_find_fixed_event,
.pmc_is_enabled = intel_pmc_is_enabled,
.pmc_idx_to_pmc = intel_pmc_idx_to_pmc,
--
2.33.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-30 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-30 7:42 [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86/pmu: Count two basic events for emulated instructions Like Xu
2021-11-30 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: x86/pmu: Setup pmc->eventsel for fixed PMCs Like Xu
2021-12-06 19:57 ` Jim Mattson
2021-12-09 18:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-09 18:53 ` Jim Mattson
2021-12-09 18:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-10 10:20 ` Like Xu
[not found] ` <CALMp9eTq8H_bJOVKwi_7j3Kum9RvW6o-G3zCLUFco1A1cvNrkQ@mail.gmail.com>
2021-12-07 6:07 ` Like Xu
2021-12-07 17:42 ` Jim Mattson
2021-11-30 7:42 ` Like Xu [this message]
2021-12-09 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: x86/pmu: Refactoring find_arch_event() to pmc_perf_hw_id() Jim Mattson
2021-12-09 8:11 ` Like Xu
2021-12-09 19:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-05 1:55 ` Jim Mattson
2022-02-09 9:00 ` Like Xu
2022-02-09 19:30 ` Jim Mattson
2022-02-10 11:28 ` Like Xu
2022-02-11 9:56 ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-02-11 18:16 ` Jim Mattson
2022-02-14 10:14 ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-02-16 7:44 ` Like Xu
2022-02-16 11:24 ` Ravi Bangoria
2021-11-30 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: x86/pmu: Reuse pmc_perf_hw_id() and drop find_fixed_event() Like Xu
2021-12-09 3:58 ` Jim Mattson
2021-11-30 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: x86/pmu: Add pmc->intr to refactor kvm_perf_overflow{_intr}() Like Xu
2021-12-09 4:25 ` Jim Mattson
2021-12-09 8:28 ` Like Xu
2021-12-10 0:54 ` Jim Mattson
2021-12-10 9:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-10 10:11 ` Like Xu
2021-12-10 22:55 ` Jim Mattson
2021-12-10 22:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-10 23:31 ` Jim Mattson
2021-12-12 4:56 ` Jim Mattson
2021-12-13 6:37 ` Jim Mattson
2021-12-16 9:57 ` Like Xu
2021-12-16 17:52 ` Jim Mattson
2021-11-30 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: x86: Update vPMCs when retiring instructions Like Xu
2021-12-09 4:33 ` Jim Mattson
2021-12-09 8:44 ` Like Xu
2021-12-09 9:23 ` Like Xu
2021-11-30 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: x86: Update vPMCs when retiring branch instructions Like Xu
2021-12-09 4:40 ` Jim Mattson
2021-12-09 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86/pmu: Count two basic events for emulated instructions Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-16 10:14 ` Like Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211130074221.93635-3-likexu@tencent.com \
--to=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®