From: xiubli@redhat.com
To: dhowells@redhat.com, idryomov@gmail.com, jlayton@kernel.org
Cc: marc.dionne@auristor.com, willy@infradead.org,
keescook@chromium.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
william.kucharski@oracle.com, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cachefs@redhat.com, vshankar@redhat.com,
Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] netfs: do not unlock and put the folio twice
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 12:51:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220707045112.10177-2-xiubli@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220707045112.10177-1-xiubli@redhat.com>
From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
check_write_begin() will unlock and put the folio when return
non-zero. So we should avoid unlocking and putting it twice in
netfs layer.
At the same time pass a **folio to check_write_begin(), in which
the folio should be cleared after being put.
URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/56423
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
---
fs/afs/file.c | 2 +-
fs/ceph/addr.c | 11 ++++++-----
fs/netfs/buffered_read.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
include/linux/netfs.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/afs/file.c b/fs/afs/file.c
index 42118a4f3383..afacce797fb9 100644
--- a/fs/afs/file.c
+++ b/fs/afs/file.c
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static int afs_begin_cache_operation(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
}
static int afs_check_write_begin(struct file *file, loff_t pos, unsigned len,
- struct folio *folio, void **_fsdata)
+ struct folio **folio, void **_fsdata)
{
struct afs_vnode *vnode = AFS_FS_I(file_inode(file));
diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c
index 8095fc47230e..cf909b08907f 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/addr.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
(CONGESTION_ON_THRESH(congestion_kb) >> 2))
static int ceph_netfs_check_write_begin(struct file *file, loff_t pos, unsigned int len,
- struct folio *folio, void **_fsdata);
+ struct folio **folio, void **_fsdata);
static inline struct ceph_snap_context *page_snap_context(struct page *page)
{
@@ -1280,18 +1280,19 @@ ceph_find_incompatible(struct page *page)
}
static int ceph_netfs_check_write_begin(struct file *file, loff_t pos, unsigned int len,
- struct folio *folio, void **_fsdata)
+ struct folio **folio, void **_fsdata)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
struct ceph_snap_context *snapc;
- snapc = ceph_find_incompatible(folio_page(folio, 0));
+ snapc = ceph_find_incompatible(folio_page(*folio, 0));
if (snapc) {
int r;
- folio_unlock(folio);
- folio_put(folio);
+ folio_unlock(*folio);
+ folio_put(*folio);
+ *folio = NULL;
if (IS_ERR(snapc))
return PTR_ERR(snapc);
diff --git a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
index 42f892c5712e..308c2ad4da8e 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
@@ -319,8 +319,8 @@ static bool netfs_skip_folio_read(struct folio *folio, loff_t pos, size_t len,
* conflicting writes once the folio is grabbed and locked. It is passed a
* pointer to the fsdata cookie that gets returned to the VM to be passed to
* write_end. It is permitted to sleep. It should return 0 if the request
- * should go ahead; unlock the folio and return -EAGAIN to cause the folio to
- * be regot; or return an error.
+ * should go ahead; otherwise unlock, put and clear the folio and then return
+ * an error, -EAGAIN will cause the folio to be regot.
*
* The calling netfs must initialise a netfs context contiguous to the vfs
* inode before calling this.
@@ -348,13 +348,14 @@ int netfs_write_begin(struct netfs_inode *ctx,
if (ctx->ops->check_write_begin) {
/* Allow the netfs (eg. ceph) to flush conflicts. */
- ret = ctx->ops->check_write_begin(file, pos, len, folio, _fsdata);
+ ret = ctx->ops->check_write_begin(file, pos, len, &folio, _fsdata);
if (ret < 0) {
trace_netfs_failure(NULL, NULL, ret, netfs_fail_check_write_begin);
if (ret == -EAGAIN)
goto retry;
- goto error;
+ goto error_unlocked;
}
+ BUG_ON(!folio);
}
if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
@@ -375,7 +376,7 @@ int netfs_write_begin(struct netfs_inode *ctx,
NETFS_READ_FOR_WRITE);
if (IS_ERR(rreq)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(rreq);
- goto error;
+ goto error_locked;
}
rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio_index(folio);
__set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO, &rreq->flags);
@@ -402,12 +403,12 @@ int netfs_write_begin(struct netfs_inode *ctx,
ret = netfs_begin_read(rreq, true);
if (ret < 0)
- goto error;
+ goto error_locked;
have_folio:
ret = folio_wait_fscache_killable(folio);
if (ret < 0)
- goto error;
+ goto error_locked;
have_folio_no_wait:
*_folio = folio;
_leave(" = 0");
@@ -415,9 +416,10 @@ int netfs_write_begin(struct netfs_inode *ctx,
error_put:
netfs_put_request(rreq, false, netfs_rreq_trace_put_failed);
-error:
+error_locked:
folio_unlock(folio);
folio_put(folio);
+error_unlocked:
_leave(" = %d", ret);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/netfs.h b/include/linux/netfs.h
index 1773e5df8e65..88c4eb85c6f7 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfs.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfs.h
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ struct netfs_request_ops {
void (*issue_read)(struct netfs_io_subrequest *subreq);
bool (*is_still_valid)(struct netfs_io_request *rreq);
int (*check_write_begin)(struct file *file, loff_t pos, unsigned len,
- struct folio *folio, void **_fsdata);
+ struct folio **folio, void **_fsdata);
void (*done)(struct netfs_io_request *rreq);
};
--
2.36.0.rc1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-07 4:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-07 4:51 [PATCH v3 0/2] netfs: fix the crash when unlocking the folio xiubli
2022-07-07 4:51 ` xiubli [this message]
2022-07-07 4:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] afs: unlock the folio when vnode is marked deleted xiubli
2022-07-07 10:56 ` Jeff Layton
2022-07-07 12:52 ` David Howells
2022-07-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] netfs: do not unlock and put the folio twice David Howells
2022-07-08 0:34 ` Xiubo Li
2022-07-07 12:53 ` David Howells
2022-07-07 13:21 ` [PATCH v4] " David Howells
2022-07-07 13:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-07-11 4:19 ` Xiubo Li
2022-07-09 0:27 ` Xiubo Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220707045112.10177-2-xiubli@redhat.com \
--to=xiubli@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=vshankar@redhat.com \
--cc=william.kucharski@oracle.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®