From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: idryomov@gmail.com, jlayton@kernel.org, marc.dionne@auristor.com,
keescook@chromium.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
william.kucharski@oracle.com, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cachefs@redhat.com, vshankar@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] netfs: do not unlock and put the folio twice
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:19:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf169f43-8ee7-8697-25da-0204d1b4343e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YsbfCcNvjMVcT2yx@casper.infradead.org>
On 7/7/22 9:26 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 02:21:45PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
>> - struct folio *folio, void **_fsdata);
>> + struct folio **_folio, void **_fsdata);
> The usual convention is that _foo means "Don't touch". This should
> probably be named "foliop" (ie pointer to a thing that would normally
> be called folio).
>
This looks good to me.
I will send out the V5 by fixing this and will merge this patch via the
ceph tree as discussed with David in the IRC and will cc the stable at
the same time.
Thanks!
-- Xiubo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-11 4:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-07 4:51 [PATCH v3 0/2] netfs: fix the crash when unlocking the folio xiubli
2022-07-07 4:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] netfs: do not unlock and put the folio twice xiubli
2022-07-07 4:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] afs: unlock the folio when vnode is marked deleted xiubli
2022-07-07 10:56 ` Jeff Layton
2022-07-07 12:52 ` David Howells
2022-07-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] netfs: do not unlock and put the folio twice David Howells
2022-07-08 0:34 ` Xiubo Li
2022-07-07 12:53 ` David Howells
2022-07-07 13:21 ` [PATCH v4] " David Howells
2022-07-07 13:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-07-11 4:19 ` Xiubo Li [this message]
2022-07-09 0:27 ` Xiubo Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf169f43-8ee7-8697-25da-0204d1b4343e@redhat.com \
--to=xiubli@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=vshankar@redhat.com \
--cc=william.kucharski@oracle.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®