mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"LKML Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	X86-kernel <x86@kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Jacon Jun Pan" <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/5] x86/microcode/intel: Allow a late-load only if a min rev is specified
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 05:11:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220817051127.3323755-3-ashok.raj@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220817051127.3323755-1-ashok.raj@intel.com>

In general users don't have the necessary information to determine
whether a late-load of a new microcode version has removed any feature
(MSR, CPUID etc) between what is currently loaded and this new microcode.
To address this issue, Intel has added a "minimum required version" field to
a previously reserved field in the file header. Microcode updates
should only be applied if the current microcode version is equal
to, or greater than this minimum required version.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/alpine.DEB.2.21.1909062237580.1902@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/

Thomas made some suggestions on how meta-data in the microcode file could
provide Linux with information to decide if the new microcode is suitable
candidate for late-load. But even the "simpler" option#1 requires a lot of
metadata and corresponding kernel code to parse it.

The proposal here is an even simpler option. The criteria for a microcode to
be a viable late-load candidate is that no CPUID or OS visible MSR features
are removed with respect to an earlier version of the microcode.

Pseudocode for late-load is as follows:

if header.min_required_id == 0
	This is old format microcode, block late-load
else if current_ucode_version < header.min_required_id
	Current version is too old, block late-load of this microcode.
else
	OK to proceed with late-load.

Any microcode that removes a feature will set the min_version to itself.
This will enforce this microcode is not suitable for late-loading.

The enforcement is not in hardware and limited to kernel loader enforcing
the requirement. It is not required for early loading of microcode to
enforce this requirement, since the new features are only
evaluated after early loading in the boot process.


Test cases covered:

1. With new kernel, attempting to load an older format microcode with the
   min_rev=0 should be blocked by kernel.

   [  210.541802] microcode: Header MUST specify min version for late-load

2. New microcode with a non-zero min_rev in the header, but the specified
   min_rev is greater than what is currently loaded in the CPU should be
   blocked by kernel.

   245.139828] microcode: Current revision 0x8f685300 is too old to update,
must be at 0xaa000050 version or higher

3. New microcode with a min_rev < currently loaded should allow loading the
   microcode

4. Build initrd with microcode that has min_rev=0, or min_rev > currently
   loaded should permit early loading microcode from initrd.


Tested-by: William Xie <william.xie@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h |  4 +++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c  | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h
index 4c92cea7e4b5..16b8715e0984 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h
@@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ struct microcode_header_intel {
 	unsigned int            pf;
 	unsigned int            datasize;
 	unsigned int            totalsize;
-	unsigned int            reserved[3];
+	unsigned int            reserved1;
+	unsigned int		min_req_id;
+	unsigned int            reserved3;
 };
 
 struct microcode_intel {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index c4b11e2fbe33..1eb202ec2302 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err)
 	struct extended_sigtable *ext_header = NULL;
 	u32 sum, orig_sum, ext_sigcount = 0, i;
 	struct extended_signature *ext_sig;
+	struct ucode_cpu_info uci;
 
 	total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header);
 	data_size = get_datasize(mc_header);
@@ -248,6 +249,25 @@ static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Enforce for late-load that min_req_id is specified in the header.
+	 * Otherwise its an old format microcode, reject it.
+	 */
+	if (print_err) {
+		if (!mc_header->min_req_id) {
+			pr_warn("Header MUST specify min version for late-load\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		intel_cpu_collect_info(&uci);
+		if (uci.cpu_sig.rev < mc_header->min_req_id) {
+			pr_warn("Current revision 0x%x is too old to update,"
+				"must  be at 0x%x version or higher\n",
+				uci.cpu_sig.rev, mc_header->min_req_id);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (!ext_table_size)
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.32.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-17  5:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-17  5:11 [PATCH v3 0/5] Making microcode late-load robust Ashok Raj
2022-08-17  5:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] x86/microcode/intel: Check against CPU signature before saving microcode Ashok Raj
2022-08-17  7:43   ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-17 10:45     ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-19 10:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-23 11:13     ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-24 19:27       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-25  3:27         ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-26 16:24           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-26 17:18             ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-26 17:29               ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-17  5:11 ` Ashok Raj [this message]
2022-08-17  7:45   ` [PATCH v3 2/5] x86/microcode/intel: Allow a late-load only if a min rev is specified Ingo Molnar
2022-08-19 11:11   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-23  0:08     ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-24 19:52       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-25  4:02         ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-26 12:09           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-17  5:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] x86/microcode: Avoid any chance of MCE's during microcode update Ashok Raj
2022-08-17  7:41   ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-17  7:58     ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-17  8:09       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-17 11:57         ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-17 12:10           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-17 12:30             ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-17 14:19               ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-17 15:06                 ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-29 14:23                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-08-17 11:40     ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-17  5:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] x86/x2apic: Support x2apic self IPI with NMI_VECTOR Ashok Raj
2022-08-17  5:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] x86/microcode: Place siblings in NMI loop while update in progress Ashok Raj
2022-08-30 19:15   ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220817051127.3323755-3-ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®