Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] x86/microcode: Avoid any chance of MCE's during microcode update

[Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>]

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:57:37AM +0000, Ashok Raj wrote:
> You have this reversed. if you get an MCE and MCIP=1 -> shutdown

Yeah yeah.

> When MCE's happen during the update they are always fatal errors.

How did you decide that?

Because all CPUs are executing the loop and thus no user process?

> What we do here by setting MCIP=1, we promote to a more severe shutdown.

It probably should say somewhere that a shutdown is possible. Because if
the shutdown really happens, you get a black screen and no info as to
why...

> Ideally I would rather let the fallout happen since its observable vs a
> blind shutdown is what we are promoting to.

What fallout do you mean exactly?

> Shutdown, shutdown.. There is only 1 MCE no matter how many CPUs you have.

Because all CPUs are executing the loop? Or how do you decide this?

> Exception is the Local MCE which is recoverable, but only to user space.
> 
> If you get an error in the atomic we are polling, its a fatal error since
> SW can't recover and we shutdown.

Aha, I think you mean that: the MCE is fatal because if it happens on
any CPU, it will be in kernel mode.

> Overthinking :-).. If there is concensus, if Boris feels comfortable
> enough, i would drop this patch.

This is what we're doing right now - thinking about the consensus. And
Boris will feel comfortable once we've arrived at a sensible decision.

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette