From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@chromium.org>
Cc: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bfq: fix waker_bfqq inconsistency crash
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 12:15:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221109111509.hauihlwywtjoofeq@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221108181030.1611703-1-khazhy@google.com>
On Tue 08-11-22 10:10:29, Khazhismel Kumykov wrote:
> This fixes crashes in bfq_add_bfqq_busy due to waker_bfqq being NULL,
> but woken_list_node still being hashed. This would happen when
> bfq_init_rq() expects a brand new allocated queue to be returned from
> bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split() and unconditionally updates waker_bfqq
> without resetting woken_list_node. Since we can always return oom_bfqq
> when attempting to allocate, we cannot assume waker_bfqq starts as NULL.
>
> Avoid setting woken_bfqq for oom_bfqq entirely, as it's not useful.
>
> Crashes would have a stacktrace like:
> [160595.656560] bfq_add_bfqq_busy+0x110/0x1ec
> [160595.661142] bfq_add_request+0x6bc/0x980
> [160595.666602] bfq_insert_request+0x8ec/0x1240
> [160595.671762] bfq_insert_requests+0x58/0x9c
> [160595.676420] blk_mq_sched_insert_request+0x11c/0x198
> [160595.682107] blk_mq_submit_bio+0x270/0x62c
> [160595.686759] __submit_bio_noacct_mq+0xec/0x178
> [160595.691926] submit_bio+0x120/0x184
> [160595.695990] ext4_mpage_readpages+0x77c/0x7c8
> [160595.701026] ext4_readpage+0x60/0xb0
> [160595.705158] filemap_read_page+0x54/0x114
> [160595.711961] filemap_fault+0x228/0x5f4
> [160595.716272] do_read_fault+0xe0/0x1f0
> [160595.720487] do_fault+0x40/0x1c8
>
> Tested by injecting random failures into bfq_get_queue, crashes go away
> completely.
>
> Fixes: 8ef3fc3a043c ("block, bfq: make shared queues inherit wakers")
> Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>
Looks good. Thanks! Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> block/bfq-iosched.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index 7ea427817f7f..ca04ec868c40 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -6784,6 +6784,12 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq)
> bfqq = bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(bfqd, bic, bio,
> true, is_sync,
> NULL);
> + if (unlikely(bfqq == &bfqd->oom_bfqq))
> + bfqq_already_existing = true;
> + } else
> + bfqq_already_existing = true;
> +
> + if (!bfqq_already_existing) {
> bfqq->waker_bfqq = old_bfqq->waker_bfqq;
> bfqq->tentative_waker_bfqq = NULL;
>
> @@ -6797,8 +6803,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq)
> if (bfqq->waker_bfqq)
> hlist_add_head(&bfqq->woken_list_node,
> &bfqq->waker_bfqq->woken_list);
> - } else
> - bfqq_already_existing = true;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-09 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-03 1:39 [RFC PATCH] " Khazhismel Kumykov
2022-11-03 2:55 ` Yu Kuai
2022-11-03 3:05 ` Khazhy Kumykov
2022-11-03 3:51 ` Yu Kuai
2022-11-03 8:47 ` Jan Kara
2022-11-04 21:25 ` Khazhy Kumykov
2022-11-07 13:26 ` Jan Kara
2022-11-08 18:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Khazhismel Kumykov
2022-11-08 18:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] bfq: ignore oom_bfqq in bfq_check_waker Khazhismel Kumykov
2022-11-09 11:14 ` Jan Kara
2022-11-09 11:15 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2022-11-09 19:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] bfq: fix waker_bfqq inconsistency crash Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221109111509.hauihlwywtjoofeq@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=khazhy@chromium.org \
--cc=khazhy@google.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®