From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>, Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/27] drm/i915/gvt: Protect gfn hash table with vgpu_lock
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:22:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230311002258.852397-11-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230311002258.852397-1-seanjc@google.com>
Use vgpu_lock instead of KVM's mmu_lock to protect accesses to the hash
table used to track which gfns are write-protected when shadowing the
guest's GTT, and hoist the acquisition of vgpu_lock from
intel_vgpu_page_track_handler() out to its sole caller,
kvmgt_page_track_write().
This fixes a bug where kvmgt_page_track_write(), which doesn't hold
kvm->mmu_lock, could race with intel_gvt_page_track_remove() and trigger
a use-after-free.
Fixing kvmgt_page_track_write() by taking kvm->mmu_lock is not an option
as mmu_lock is a r/w spinlock, and intel_vgpu_page_track_handler() might
sleep when acquiring vgpu->cache_lock deep down the callstack:
intel_vgpu_page_track_handler()
|
|-> page_track->handler / ppgtt_write_protection_handler()
|
|-> ppgtt_handle_guest_write_page_table_bytes()
|
|-> ppgtt_handle_guest_write_page_table()
|
|-> ppgtt_handle_guest_entry_removal()
|
|-> ppgtt_invalidate_pte()
|
|-> intel_gvt_dma_unmap_guest_page()
|
|-> mutex_lock(&vgpu->cache_lock);
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 55 +++++++++++++++------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/page_track.c | 10 +----
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index 68be66395598..9824d075562e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -366,6 +366,8 @@ __kvmgt_protect_table_find(struct intel_vgpu *info, gfn_t gfn)
{
struct kvmgt_pgfn *p, *res = NULL;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&info->vgpu_lock);
+
hash_for_each_possible(info->ptable, p, hnode, gfn) {
if (gfn == p->gfn) {
res = p;
@@ -1567,6 +1569,9 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_add(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
if (!test_bit(INTEL_VGPU_STATUS_ATTACHED, info->status))
return -ESRCH;
+ if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
+ return 0;
+
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
if (!slot) {
@@ -1575,16 +1580,12 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_add(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
}
write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-
- if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
- goto out;
-
kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(kvm, slot, gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE);
+ write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+
kvmgt_protect_table_add(info, gfn);
-
-out:
- write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
return 0;
}
@@ -1597,24 +1598,22 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_remove(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
if (!test_bit(INTEL_VGPU_STATUS_ATTACHED, info->status))
return -ESRCH;
- idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
- slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
- if (!slot) {
- srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-
if (!kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
- goto out;
+ return 0;
+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+ slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
+ if (!slot) {
+ srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(kvm, slot, gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE);
+ write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+
kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn);
-
-out:
- write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
return 0;
}
@@ -1625,9 +1624,13 @@ static void kvmgt_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
struct intel_vgpu *info =
container_of(node, struct intel_vgpu, track_node);
+ mutex_lock(&info->vgpu_lock);
+
if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gpa_to_gfn(gpa)))
intel_vgpu_page_track_handler(info, gpa,
(void *)val, len);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&info->vgpu_lock);
}
static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
@@ -1639,16 +1642,20 @@ static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
struct intel_vgpu *info =
container_of(node, struct intel_vgpu, track_node);
- write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&info->vgpu_lock);
+
for (i = 0; i < slot->npages; i++) {
gfn = slot->base_gfn + i;
if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn)) {
+ write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(kvm, slot, gfn,
KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE);
+ write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn);
}
}
- write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&info->vgpu_lock);
}
void intel_vgpu_detach_regions(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/page_track.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/page_track.c
index df34e73cba41..60a65435556d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/page_track.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/page_track.c
@@ -162,13 +162,9 @@ int intel_vgpu_page_track_handler(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, u64 gpa,
struct intel_vgpu_page_track *page_track;
int ret = 0;
- mutex_lock(&vgpu->vgpu_lock);
-
page_track = intel_vgpu_find_page_track(vgpu, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
- if (!page_track) {
- ret = -ENXIO;
- goto out;
- }
+ if (!page_track)
+ return -ENXIO;
if (unlikely(vgpu->failsafe)) {
/* Remove write protection to prevent furture traps. */
@@ -179,7 +175,5 @@ int intel_vgpu_page_track_handler(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, u64 gpa,
gvt_err("guest page write error, gpa %llx\n", gpa);
}
-out:
- mutex_unlock(&vgpu->vgpu_lock);
return ret;
}
--
2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-11 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-11 0:22 [PATCH v2 00/27] drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/27] drm/i915/gvt: Verify pfn is "valid" before dereferencing "struct page" Sean Christopherson
2023-03-13 15:37 ` Wang, Wei W
2023-03-15 18:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Andrzej Hajda
2023-03-15 19:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 4:20 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out helper to get max mapping size of a memslot Sean Christopherson
2023-03-13 15:37 ` Wang, Wei W
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/27] drm/i915/gvt: remove interface intel_gvt_is_valid_gfn Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 4:26 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 04/27] drm/i915/gvt: Incorporate KVM memslot info into check for 2MiB GTT entry Sean Christopherson
2023-03-14 3:09 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-14 17:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 05/27] drm/i915/gvt: Verify VFIO-pinned page is THP when shadowing 2M gtt entry Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 5:33 ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-04 20:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-06 6:35 ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-06 10:57 ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-08 14:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/27] drm/i915/gvt: Put the page reference obtained by KVM's gfn_to_pfn() Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 6:18 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/27] drm/i915/gvt: Don't rely on KVM's gfn_to_pfn() to query possible 2M GTT Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 5:37 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 08/27] drm/i915/gvt: Use an "unsigned long" to iterate over memslot gfns Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 6:19 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 09/27] drm/i915/gvt: Drop unused helper intel_vgpu_reset_gtt() Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 6:20 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-03-17 6:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/27] drm/i915/gvt: Protect gfn hash table with vgpu_lock Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 11/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't rely on page-track mechanism to flush on memslot change Sean Christopherson
2023-03-15 1:08 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-15 15:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 12/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't bounce through page-track mechanism for guest PTEs Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 6:37 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 13/27] KVM: drm/i915/gvt: Drop @vcpu from KVM's ->track_write() hook Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 7:28 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 14/27] KVM: x86: Reject memslot MOVE operations if KVMGT is attached Sean Christopherson
2023-03-15 8:03 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-15 15:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-16 9:27 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-17 7:29 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 15/27] drm/i915/gvt: Don't bother removing write-protection on to-be-deleted slot Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 7:30 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 16/27] KVM: x86: Add a new page-track hook to handle memslot deletion Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 7:43 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-17 16:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 17/27] drm/i915/gvt: switch from ->track_flush_slot() to ->track_remove_region() Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 7:45 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 18/27] KVM: x86: Remove the unused page-track hook track_flush_slot() Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 19/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Move KVM-only page-track declarations to internal header Sean Christopherson
2023-03-15 8:44 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-15 15:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-16 9:19 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 20/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Use page-track notifiers iff there are external users Sean Christopherson
2023-03-15 9:34 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-15 16:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-16 9:29 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-15 10:36 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-15 16:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-04 19:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-06 1:08 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 21/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop infrastructure for multiple page-track modes Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 22/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename page-track APIs to reflect the new reality Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 23/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Assert that correct locks are held for page write-tracking Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 7:55 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 24/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug the VM if write-tracking is used but not enabled Sean Christopherson
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 25/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop @slot param from exported/external page-track APIs Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 8:28 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-23 8:50 ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-03 23:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-04 2:17 ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-08 1:15 ` Yan Zhao
2023-05-11 22:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-12 2:58 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 26/27] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle KVM bookkeeping in page-track APIs, not callers Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 8:52 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-11 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 27/27] drm/i915/gvt: Drop final dependencies on KVM internal details Sean Christopherson
2023-03-17 8:58 ` Yan Zhao
2023-03-13 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 00/27] drm/i915/gvt: KVM: KVMGT fixes and page-track cleanups Yan Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230311002258.852397-11-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®