Re: [PATCH v2 17/27] drm/i915/gvt: switch from ->track_flush_slot() to ->track_remove_region()

[Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>]

Tested-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 04:22:48PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
> 
> Switch from the poorly named and flawed ->track_flush_slot() to the newly
> introduced ->track_remove_region().  From KVMGT's perspective, the two
> hooks are functionally equivalent, the only difference being that
> ->track_remove_region() is called only when KVM is 100% certain the
> memory region will be removed, i.e. is invoked slightly later in KVM's
> memslot modification flow.
> 
> Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
> [sean: handle name change, massage changelog, rebase]
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 21 +++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> index 577712ea4893..9f188b6c3edf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> @@ -108,9 +108,8 @@ struct gvt_dma {
>  
>  static void kvmgt_page_track_write(gpa_t gpa, const u8 *val, int len,
>  				   struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
> -static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
> -		struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> -		struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
> +static void kvmgt_page_track_remove_region(gfn_t gfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> +					   struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
>  
>  static ssize_t intel_vgpu_show_description(struct mdev_type *mtype, char *buf)
>  {
> @@ -680,7 +679,7 @@ static int intel_vgpu_open_device(struct vfio_device *vfio_dev)
>  		return -EEXIST;
>  
>  	vgpu->track_node.track_write = kvmgt_page_track_write;
> -	vgpu->track_node.track_flush_slot = kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot;
> +	vgpu->track_node.track_remove_region = kvmgt_page_track_remove_region;
>  	kvm_get_kvm(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm);
>  	kvm_page_track_register_notifier(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm,
>  					 &vgpu->track_node);
> @@ -1631,22 +1630,20 @@ static void kvmgt_page_track_write(gpa_t gpa, const u8 *val, int len,
>  	mutex_unlock(&info->vgpu_lock);
>  }
>  
> -static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
> -		struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> -		struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node)
> +static void kvmgt_page_track_remove_region(gfn_t gfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> +					   struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node)
>  {
>  	unsigned long i;
> -	gfn_t gfn;
>  	struct intel_vgpu *info =
>  		container_of(node, struct intel_vgpu, track_node);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&info->vgpu_lock);
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < slot->npages; i++) {
> -		gfn = slot->base_gfn + i;
> -		if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
> -			kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn);
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> +		if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn + i))
> +			kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn + i);
>  	}
> +
>  	mutex_unlock(&info->vgpu_lock);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog
>