From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] cacheinfo: Check sib_leaf in cache_leaves_are_shared()
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 11:04:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230413-willing-ignition-176ca292846d@wendy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230413091436.230134-2-pierre.gondois@arm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1202 bytes --]
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:14:31AM +0200, Pierre Gondois wrote:
> If there is no ACPI/DT information, it is assumed that L1 caches
> are private and L2 (and higher) caches are shared. A cache is
> 'shared' between two CPUs if it is accessible from these two
> CPUs.
>
> Each CPU owns a representation (i.e. has a dedicated cacheinfo struct)
> of the caches it has access to. cache_leaves_are_shared() tries to
> identify whether two representations are designating the same actual
> cache.
>
> In cache_leaves_are_shared(), if 'this_leaf' is a L2 cache (or higher)
> and 'sib_leaf' is a L1 cache, the caches are detected as shared as
> only this_leaf's cache level is checked.
> This is leads to setting sib_leaf as being shared with another CPU,
> which is incorrect as this is a L1 cache.
>
> Check 'sib_leaf->level'. Also update the comment as the function is
> called when populating 'shared_cpu_map'.
>
> Fixes: f16d1becf96f ("cacheinfo: Use cache identifiers to check if the caches are shared if available")
Cool, thanks for the updated commit message. Easier to twig the
rationale this way.
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Thanks,
Conor.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-13 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-13 9:14 [PATCH v3 0/4] cacheinfo: Correctly fallback to using clidr_el1's information Pierre Gondois
2023-04-13 9:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] cacheinfo: Check sib_leaf in cache_leaves_are_shared() Pierre Gondois
2023-04-13 10:04 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-04-13 9:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] cacheinfo: Check cache properties are present in DT Pierre Gondois
2023-04-13 10:06 ` Conor Dooley
2023-04-13 18:16 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-04-13 19:50 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-04-13 20:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-04-14 7:33 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-04-14 9:05 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-04-14 22:21 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-04-14 8:19 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-04-13 9:14 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] arch_topology: Remove early cacheinfo error message Pierre Gondois
2023-04-13 10:02 ` Conor Dooley
2023-04-13 10:25 ` Conor Dooley
2023-04-13 15:25 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-04-13 16:23 ` Conor Dooley
2023-04-13 9:14 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] cacheinfo: Add use_arch[|_cache]_info field/function Pierre Gondois
2023-04-13 9:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-04-13 10:17 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-04-13 10:20 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230413-willing-ignition-176ca292846d@wendy \
--to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rrendec@redhat.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®