From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com,
bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com,
xingxin.hx@openanolis.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
peternewman@google.com, dfustini@baylibre.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 05/24] x86/resctrl: Allow RMID allocation to be scoped by CLOSID
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 18:01:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230525180209.19497-6-james.morse@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230525180209.19497-1-james.morse@arm.com>
MPAMs RMID values are not unique unless the CLOSID is considered as well.
alloc_rmid() expects the RMID to be an independent number.
Pass the CLOSID in to alloc_rmid(). Use this to compare indexes when
allocating. If the CLOSID is not relevant to the index, this ends up
comparing the free RMID with itself, and the first free entry will be
used. With MPAM the CLOSID is included in the index, so this becomes a
walk of the free RMID entries, until one that matches the supplied
CLOSID is found.
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
Changes since v2;
* Rephrased comment in resctrl_find_free_rmid() to describe this in terms of
list_entry_first()
* Rephrased comment above alloc_rmid()
Changes since v3:
* Flipped conditions in alloc_rmid()
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
index d571da4848a4..23e20f89d2b3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ void rdtgroup_pseudo_lock_remove(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp);
struct rdt_domain *get_domain_from_cpu(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r);
int closids_supported(void);
void closid_free(int closid);
-int alloc_rmid(void);
+int alloc_rmid(u32 closid);
void free_rmid(u32 closid, u32 rmid);
int rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r);
bool __init rdt_cpu_has(int flag);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
index bcc25f5339c0..27e731c7de72 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
@@ -337,24 +337,49 @@ bool has_busy_rmid(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d)
return find_first_bit(d->rmid_busy_llc, idx_limit) != idx_limit;
}
-/*
- * As of now the RMIDs allocation is global.
- * However we keep track of which packages the RMIDs
- * are used to optimize the limbo list management.
- */
-int alloc_rmid(void)
+static struct rmid_entry *resctrl_find_free_rmid(u32 closid)
{
- struct rmid_entry *entry;
-
- lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex);
+ struct rmid_entry *itr;
+ u32 itr_idx, cmp_idx;
if (list_empty(&rmid_free_lru))
- return rmid_limbo_count ? -EBUSY : -ENOSPC;
+ return rmid_limbo_count ? ERR_PTR(-EBUSY) : ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(itr, &rmid_free_lru, list) {
+ /*
+ * get the index of this free RMID, and the index it would need
+ * to be if it were used with this CLOSID.
+ * If the CLOSID is irrelevant on this architecture, these will
+ * always be the same meaning the compiler can reduce this loop
+ * to a single list_entry_first() call.
+ */
+ itr_idx = resctrl_arch_rmid_idx_encode(itr->closid, itr->rmid);
+ cmp_idx = resctrl_arch_rmid_idx_encode(closid, itr->rmid);
+
+ if (itr_idx == cmp_idx)
+ return itr;
+ }
+
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
+}
+
+/*
+ * For MPAM the RMID value is not unique, and has to be considered with
+ * the CLOSID. The (CLOSID, RMID) pair is allocated on all domains, which
+ * allows all domains to be managed by a single limbo list.
+ * Each domain also has a rmid_busy_llc to reduce the work of the limbo handler.
+ */
+int alloc_rmid(u32 closid)
+{
+ struct rmid_entry *entry;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex);
+
+ entry = resctrl_find_free_rmid(closid);
+ if (IS_ERR(entry))
+ return PTR_ERR(entry);
- entry = list_first_entry(&rmid_free_lru,
- struct rmid_entry, list);
list_del(&entry->list);
-
return entry->rmid;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
index aeadaeb5df9a..5ebd6e54c7f2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ int rdtgroup_locksetup_exit(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
int ret;
if (rdt_mon_capable) {
- ret = alloc_rmid();
+ ret = alloc_rmid(rdtgrp->closid);
if (ret < 0) {
rdt_last_cmd_puts("Out of RMIDs\n");
return ret;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
index 8346a8f2ff9f..ba0595508b2f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
@@ -3159,7 +3159,7 @@ static int mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
if (!rdt_mon_capable)
return 0;
- ret = alloc_rmid();
+ ret = alloc_rmid(rdtgrp->closid);
if (ret < 0) {
rdt_last_cmd_puts("Out of RMIDs\n");
return ret;
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-25 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-25 18:01 [PATCH v4 00/24] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 01/24] x86/resctrl: Track the closid with the rmid James Morse
2023-06-15 22:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 02/24] x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index James Morse
2023-06-08 7:52 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-06-15 22:03 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-07-28 16:34 ` James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 03/24] x86/resctrl: Create helper for RMID allocation and mondata dir creation James Morse
2023-06-15 22:04 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 04/24] x86/resctrl: Move rmid allocation out of mkdir_rdt_prepare() James Morse
2023-06-15 22:05 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:01 ` James Morse [this message]
2023-06-15 22:05 ` [PATCH v4 05/24] x86/resctrl: Allow RMID allocation to be scoped by CLOSID Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 06/24] x86/resctrl: Track the number of dirty RMID a CLOSID has James Morse
2023-06-15 22:08 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-07-28 16:35 ` James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 07/24] x86/resctrl: Use set_bit()/clear_bit() instead of open coding James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 08/24] x86/resctrl: Allocate the cleanest CLOSID by searching closid_num_dirty_rmid James Morse
2023-06-15 22:09 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-07-28 16:35 ` James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 09/24] x86/resctrl: Move CLOSID/RMID matching and setting to use helpers James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 10/24] tick/nohz: Move tick_nohz_full_mask declaration outside the #ifdef James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 11/24] x86/resctrl: Add cpumask_any_housekeeping() for limbo/overflow James Morse
2023-06-15 22:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 12/24] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() retry when it is interrupted James Morse
2023-06-06 8:49 ` Peter Newman
2023-06-06 17:03 ` James Morse
2023-06-07 12:51 ` Peter Newman
2023-07-17 17:07 ` James Morse
2023-06-08 8:53 ` Peter Newman
2023-07-17 17:06 ` James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 13/24] x86/resctrl: Queue mon_event_read() instead of sending an IPI James Morse
2023-06-15 22:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 14/24] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep James Morse
2023-06-15 22:13 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-07-28 16:32 ` James Morse
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 15/24] x86/resctrl: Allow arch to allocate memory needed in resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2023-06-12 5:39 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-07-28 16:34 ` James Morse
2023-06-15 22:13 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 16/24] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_mounted checks explicit James Morse
2023-06-15 22:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 17/24] x86/resctrl: Move alloc/mon static keys into helpers James Morse
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 18/24] x86/resctrl: Make rdt_enable_key the arch's decision to switch James Morse
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 19/24] x86/resctrl: Add helpers for system wide mon/alloc capable James Morse
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 20/24] x86/resctrl: Add cpu online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2023-06-15 22:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 21/24] x86/resctrl: Allow overflow/limbo handlers to be scheduled on any-but cpu James Morse
2023-06-09 11:10 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-07-28 16:29 ` James Morse
2023-06-15 22:25 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-07-28 16:29 ` James Morse
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 22/24] x86/resctrl: Add cpu offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 23/24] x86/resctrl: Move domain helper migration into resctrl_offline_cpu() James Morse
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 24/24] x86/resctrl: Separate arch and fs resctrl locks James Morse
2023-06-13 9:15 ` Peter Newman
2023-07-28 16:32 ` James Morse
2023-06-15 22:26 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-07-28 16:34 ` James Morse
2023-06-13 6:18 ` [PATCH v4 00/24] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-07-28 16:34 ` James Morse
2023-06-15 23:28 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230525180209.19497-6-james.morse@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=xingxin.hx@openanolis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®