From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com,
bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com,
xingxin.hx@openanolis.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
peternewman@google.com, dfustini@baylibre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/24] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 17:32:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cabf6ebd-1fba-d73f-b281-12f70d53ef55@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201aff6a-7bd0-e0e6-5ee8-1b9eab223cb0@intel.com>
Hi Reinette,
On 15/06/2023 23:13, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> On 5/25/2023 11:01 AM, James Morse wrote:
>> MPAM's cache occupancy counters can take a little while to settle once
>> the monitor has been configured. The maximum settling time is described
>> to the driver via a firmware table. The value could be large enough
>> that it makes sense to sleep. To avoid exposing this to resctrl, it
>> should be hidden behind MPAM's resctrl_arch_rmid_read().
>>
>> resctrl_arch_rmid_read() may be called via IPI meaning it is unable
>> to sleep. In this case resctrl_arch_rmid_read() should return an error
>> if it needs to sleep. This will only affect MPAM platforms where
>> the cache occupancy counter isn't available immediately, nohz_full is
>> in use, and there are there are no housekeeping CPUs in the necessary
>> domain.
>>
>> There are three callers of resctrl_arch_rmid_read():
>> __mon_event_count() and __check_limbo() are both called from a
>> non-migrateable context. mon_event_read() invokes __mon_event_count()
>> using smp_call_on_cpu(), which adds work to the target CPUs workqueue.
>> rdtgroup_mutex() is held, meaning this cannot race with the resctrl
>> cpuhp callback. __check_limbo() is invoked via schedule_delayed_work_on()
>> also adds work to a per-cpu workqueue.
>>
>> The remaining call is add_rmid_to_limbo() which is called in response
>> to a user-space syscall that frees an rmid. This opportunistically
>> reads the llc occupancy counter on the current domain to see if the
>> RMID is over the dirty threshold. This has to disable preemption to
>> avoid reading the wrong domain's value. Disabling pre-emption here
>> prevents resctrl_arch_rmid_read() from sleeping.
>>
>> add_rmid_to_limbo() walks each domain, but only reads the counter
>> on one domain. If the system has more than one domain, the RMID will
>> always be added to the limbo list. If the RMIDs usage was not over the
>> threshold, it will be removed from the list when __check_limbo() runs.
>> Make this the default behaviour. Free RMIDs are always added to the
>> limbo list for each domain.
>>
>> The user visible effect of this is that a clean RMID is not available
>> for re-allocation immediately after 'rmdir()' completes, this behaviour
>> was never portable as it never happened on a machine with multiple
>> domains.
>>
>> Removing this path allows resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep if its called
>> with interrupts unmasked. Document this is the expected behaviour, and
>> add a might_sleep() annotation to catch changes that won't work on arm64.
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> index 6ba40495589a..fb33100e172b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> @@ -491,7 +481,6 @@ static void add_rmid_to_limbo(struct rmid_entry *entry)
>> set_bit(idx, d->rmid_busy_llc);
>> entry->busy++;
>> }
>> - put_cpu();
>>
>> if (entry->busy)
>> rmid_limbo_count++;
>
> Would entry->busy ever be 0 after this change?
Good point - the domains list can never be empty!
>> diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
>> index ff7452f644e4..b961936decfa 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
>> @@ -234,7 +234,12 @@ void resctrl_offline_domain(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d);
>> * @eventid: eventid to read, e.g. L3 occupancy.
>> * @val: result of the counter read in bytes.
>> *
>> - * Call from process context on a CPU that belongs to domain @d.
>> + * Some architectures need to sleep when first programming some of the counters.
>> + * (specifically: arm64's MPAM cache occupancy counters can return 'not ready'
>> + * for a short period of time). Call from a non-migrateable process context on
>> + * a CPU that belongs to domain @d. e.g. use smp_call_on_cpu() or
>> + * schedule_work_on(). This function can be called with interrupts masked,
>> + * e.g. using smp_call_function_any(), but may concistently return an error.
>> *
>
> concistently -> consistently?
>
>> * Return:
>> * 0 on success, or -EIO, -EINVAL etc on error.
>> @@ -243,6 +248,17 @@ int resctrl_arch_rmid_read(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d,
>> u32 closid, u32 rmid, enum resctrl_event_id eventid,
>> u64 *val);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * resctrl_arch_rmid_read_context_check() - warn about invalid contexts
>> + *
>> + * When built with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, this function will generate a
>> + * warning when resctrl_arch_rmid_read() is called from an invalid context.
>
> No need to say "this function"
> Could this comment be more specific about which contexts are invalid instead of
> just referring to it as "invalid context". This seems to expect the reader to
> already know what an invalid context would be.
I thought the implementation was enough - the comment was intended to say this does
nothing unless you select that build option. I've changed it to:
| * When built with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP generate a warning when
| * resctrl_arch_rmid_read() is called with preemption disabled.
>> + */
>> +static inline void resctrl_arch_rmid_read_context_check(void)
>> +{
>> + if (!irqs_disabled())
>> + might_sleep();
>> +}
> Could you please elaborate why the "!irqs_disabled()" is needed?
It's a question of what the interface should support.
It needs to support being called via IPI because that is going to happen on NOHZ_FULL
platforms. In this case the platforms where the MPAM code needs to sleep will have to
return an error. For folk that see this in practice: they need at least one housekeeping
CPU per domain.
Outside that the function shouldn't be called with pre-emption disabled, as that would
prevent it from sleeping, but the lockdep annotations that check for pre-emption also go
off when interrupts are masked, hence the slightly funny check.
It's documented against resctrl_arch_rmid_read():
| * Some architectures need to sleep when first programming some of the counters.
| * (specifically: arm64's MPAM cache occupancy counters can return 'not ready'
| * for a short period of time). Call from a non-migrateable process context on
| * a CPU that belongs to domain @d. e.g. use smp_call_on_cpu() or
| * schedule_work_on(). This function can be called with interrupts masked,
| * e.g. using smp_call_function_any(), but may consistently return an error.
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-28 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-25 18:01 [PATCH v4 00/24] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 01/24] x86/resctrl: Track the closid with the rmid James Morse
2023-06-15 22:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 02/24] x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index James Morse
2023-06-08 7:52 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-06-15 22:03 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-07-28 16:34 ` James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 03/24] x86/resctrl: Create helper for RMID allocation and mondata dir creation James Morse
2023-06-15 22:04 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 04/24] x86/resctrl: Move rmid allocation out of mkdir_rdt_prepare() James Morse
2023-06-15 22:05 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 05/24] x86/resctrl: Allow RMID allocation to be scoped by CLOSID James Morse
2023-06-15 22:05 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 06/24] x86/resctrl: Track the number of dirty RMID a CLOSID has James Morse
2023-06-15 22:08 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-07-28 16:35 ` James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 07/24] x86/resctrl: Use set_bit()/clear_bit() instead of open coding James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 08/24] x86/resctrl: Allocate the cleanest CLOSID by searching closid_num_dirty_rmid James Morse
2023-06-15 22:09 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-07-28 16:35 ` James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 09/24] x86/resctrl: Move CLOSID/RMID matching and setting to use helpers James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 10/24] tick/nohz: Move tick_nohz_full_mask declaration outside the #ifdef James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 11/24] x86/resctrl: Add cpumask_any_housekeeping() for limbo/overflow James Morse
2023-06-15 22:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 12/24] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() retry when it is interrupted James Morse
2023-06-06 8:49 ` Peter Newman
2023-06-06 17:03 ` James Morse
2023-06-07 12:51 ` Peter Newman
2023-07-17 17:07 ` James Morse
2023-06-08 8:53 ` Peter Newman
2023-07-17 17:06 ` James Morse
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 13/24] x86/resctrl: Queue mon_event_read() instead of sending an IPI James Morse
2023-06-15 22:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:01 ` [PATCH v4 14/24] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep James Morse
2023-06-15 22:13 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-07-28 16:32 ` James Morse [this message]
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 15/24] x86/resctrl: Allow arch to allocate memory needed in resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2023-06-12 5:39 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-07-28 16:34 ` James Morse
2023-06-15 22:13 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 16/24] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_mounted checks explicit James Morse
2023-06-15 22:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 17/24] x86/resctrl: Move alloc/mon static keys into helpers James Morse
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 18/24] x86/resctrl: Make rdt_enable_key the arch's decision to switch James Morse
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 19/24] x86/resctrl: Add helpers for system wide mon/alloc capable James Morse
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 20/24] x86/resctrl: Add cpu online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2023-06-15 22:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 21/24] x86/resctrl: Allow overflow/limbo handlers to be scheduled on any-but cpu James Morse
2023-06-09 11:10 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-07-28 16:29 ` James Morse
2023-06-15 22:25 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-07-28 16:29 ` James Morse
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 22/24] x86/resctrl: Add cpu offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 23/24] x86/resctrl: Move domain helper migration into resctrl_offline_cpu() James Morse
2023-05-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 24/24] x86/resctrl: Separate arch and fs resctrl locks James Morse
2023-06-13 9:15 ` Peter Newman
2023-07-28 16:32 ` James Morse
2023-06-15 22:26 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-07-28 16:34 ` James Morse
2023-06-13 6:18 ` [PATCH v4 00/24] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-07-28 16:34 ` James Morse
2023-06-15 23:28 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cabf6ebd-1fba-d73f-b281-12f70d53ef55@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=xingxin.hx@openanolis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®