mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	<yangerkun@huawei.com>, <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>,
	<yukuai3@huawei.com>, <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] quota: fix dqput() to follow the guarantees dquot_srcu should provide
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 21:21:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230628132155.1560425-6-libaokun1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230628132155.1560425-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>

The dquot_mark_dquot_dirty() using dquot references from the inode
should be protected by dquot_srcu. quota_off code takes care to call
synchronize_srcu(&dquot_srcu) to not drop dquot references while they
are used by other users. But dquot_transfer() breaks this assumption.
We call dquot_transfer() to drop the last reference of dquot and add
it to free_dquots, but there may still be other users using the dquot
at this time, as shown in the function graph below:

       cpu1              cpu2
_________________|_________________
wb_do_writeback         CHOWN(1)
 ...
  ext4_da_update_reserve_space
   dquot_claim_block
    ...
     dquot_mark_dquot_dirty // try to dirty old quota
      test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags) // still ACTIVE
      if (test_bit(DQ_MOD_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
      // test no dirty, wait dq_list_lock
                    ...
                     dquot_transfer
                      __dquot_transfer
                      dqput_all(transfer_from) // rls old dquot
                       dqput // last dqput
                        dquot_release
                         clear_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags)
                        atomic_dec(&dquot->dq_count)
                        put_dquot_last(dquot)
                         list_add_tail(&dquot->dq_free, &free_dquots)
                         // add the dquot to free_dquots
      if (!test_and_set_bit(DQ_MOD_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
        add dqi_dirty_list // add released dquot to dirty_list

This can cause various issues, such as dquot being destroyed by
dqcache_shrink_scan() after being added to free_dquots, which can trigger
a UAF in dquot_mark_dquot_dirty(); or after dquot is added to free_dquots
and then to dirty_list, it is added to free_dquots again after
dquot_writeback_dquots() is executed, which causes the free_dquots list to
be corrupted and triggers a UAF when dqcache_shrink_scan() is called for
freeing dquot twice.

As Honza said, we need to fix dquot_transfer() to follow the guarantees
dquot_srcu should provide. But calling synchronize_srcu() directly from
dquot_transfer() is too expensive (and mostly unnecessary). So we add
dquot whose last reference should be dropped to the new global dquot
list releasing_dquots, and then queue work item which would call
synchronize_srcu() and after that perform the final cleanup of all the
dquots on releasing_dquots.

Fixes: 4580b30ea887 ("quota: Do not dirty bad dquots")
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
---
 fs/quota/dquot.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/quota/dquot.c b/fs/quota/dquot.c
index 09787e4f6a00..e8e702ac64e5 100644
--- a/fs/quota/dquot.c
+++ b/fs/quota/dquot.c
@@ -270,6 +270,9 @@ static qsize_t inode_get_rsv_space(struct inode *inode);
 static qsize_t __inode_get_rsv_space(struct inode *inode);
 static int __dquot_initialize(struct inode *inode, int type);
 
+static void quota_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work);
+static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(quota_release_work, quota_release_workfn);
+
 static inline unsigned int
 hashfn(const struct super_block *sb, struct kqid qid)
 {
@@ -569,6 +572,8 @@ static void invalidate_dquots(struct super_block *sb, int type)
 	struct dquot *dquot, *tmp;
 
 restart:
+	flush_delayed_work(&quota_release_work);
+
 	spin_lock(&dq_list_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(dquot, tmp, &inuse_list, dq_inuse) {
 		if (dquot->dq_sb != sb)
@@ -577,6 +582,12 @@ static void invalidate_dquots(struct super_block *sb, int type)
 			continue;
 		/* Wait for dquot users */
 		if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count)) {
+			/* dquot in releasing_dquots, flush and retry */
+			if (!list_empty(&dquot->dq_free)) {
+				spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
+				goto restart;
+			}
+
 			atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);
 			spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
 			/*
@@ -760,6 +771,8 @@ dqcache_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 	struct dquot *dquot;
 	unsigned long freed = 0;
 
+	flush_delayed_work(&quota_release_work);
+
 	spin_lock(&dq_list_lock);
 	while (!list_empty(&free_dquots) && sc->nr_to_scan) {
 		dquot = list_first_entry(&free_dquots, struct dquot, dq_free);
@@ -787,6 +800,60 @@ static struct shrinker dqcache_shrinker = {
 	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
 };
 
+/*
+ * Safely release dquot and put reference to dquot.
+ */
+static void quota_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct dquot *dquot;
+	struct list_head rls_head;
+
+	spin_lock(&dq_list_lock);
+	/* Exchange the list head to avoid livelock. */
+	list_replace_init(&releasing_dquots, &rls_head);
+	spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
+
+restart:
+	synchronize_srcu(&dquot_srcu);
+	spin_lock(&dq_list_lock);
+	while (!list_empty(&rls_head)) {
+		dquot = list_first_entry(&rls_head, struct dquot, dq_free);
+		if (dquot_dirty(dquot)) {
+			spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
+			/* Commit dquot before releasing */
+			dquot_write_dquot(dquot);
+			goto restart;
+		}
+		/* Always clear DQ_ACTIVE_B, unless racing with dqget() */
+		if (dquot_active(dquot)) {
+			spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
+			dquot->dq_sb->dq_op->release_dquot(dquot);
+			spin_lock(&dq_list_lock);
+		}
+		/*
+		 * During the execution of dquot_release() outside the
+		 * dq_list_lock, another process may have completed
+		 * dqget()/dqput()/mark_dirty().
+		 */
+		if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count) == 1 &&
+		    (dquot_active(dquot) || dquot_dirty(dquot))) {
+			spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
+			goto restart;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Now it is safe to remove this dquot from releasing_dquots
+		 * and reduce its reference count.
+		 */
+		remove_free_dquot(dquot);
+		atomic_dec(&dquot->dq_count);
+
+		/* We may be racing with some other dqget(). */
+		if (!atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
+			put_dquot_last(dquot);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
+}
+
 /*
  * Put reference to dquot
  */
@@ -803,7 +870,7 @@ void dqput(struct dquot *dquot)
 	}
 #endif
 	dqstats_inc(DQST_DROPS);
-we_slept:
+
 	spin_lock(&dq_list_lock);
 	if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count) > 1) {
 		/* We have more than one user... nothing to do */
@@ -815,25 +882,15 @@ void dqput(struct dquot *dquot)
 		spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
 		return;
 	}
+
 	/* Need to release dquot? */
-	if (dquot_dirty(dquot)) {
-		spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
-		/* Commit dquot before releasing */
-		dquot_write_dquot(dquot);
-		goto we_slept;
-	}
-	if (dquot_active(dquot)) {
-		spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
-		dquot->dq_sb->dq_op->release_dquot(dquot);
-		goto we_slept;
-	}
-	atomic_dec(&dquot->dq_count);
 #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA_DEBUG
 	/* sanity check */
 	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dquot->dq_free));
 #endif
-	put_dquot_last(dquot);
+	put_releasing_dquots(dquot);
 	spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
+	queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &quota_release_work, 1);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dqput);
 
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-28 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-28 13:21 [PATCH v2 0/7] quota: fix race condition between dqput() and dquot_mark_dquot_dirty() Baokun Li
2023-06-28 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] quota: factor out dquot_write_dquot() Baokun Li
2023-06-28 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] quota: add new global dquot list releasing_dquots Baokun Li
2023-06-29 10:29   ` Jan Kara
2023-06-29 11:10     ` Baokun Li
2023-06-28 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] quota: rename dquot_active() to inode_dquot_active() Baokun Li
2023-06-29 10:24   ` Jan Kara
2023-06-29 11:14     ` Baokun Li
2023-06-28 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] quota: add new helper dquot_active() Baokun Li
2023-06-28 13:21 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2023-06-29 10:59   ` [PATCH v2 5/7] quota: fix dqput() to follow the guarantees dquot_srcu should provide Jan Kara
2023-06-29 11:47     ` Baokun Li
2023-06-29 14:33       ` Jan Kara
2023-06-30  7:45         ` Baokun Li
2023-06-28 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] quota: simplify drop_dquot_ref() Baokun Li
2023-06-29 11:08   ` Jan Kara
2023-06-29 12:13     ` Baokun Li
2023-06-29 14:09       ` Jan Kara
2023-06-29 14:16         ` Baokun Li
2023-06-28 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] quota: remove unused function put_dquot_list() Baokun Li
2023-06-29 11:05   ` Jan Kara
2023-06-29 12:18     ` Baokun Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230628132155.1560425-6-libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®