mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	<yangerkun@huawei.com>, <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>,
	<yukuai3@huawei.com>, Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] quota: simplify drop_dquot_ref()
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 20:13:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d00a224e-1991-ce90-d458-45390a20f8dc@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230629110813.kfaja4bdomilmns6@quack3>

On 2023/6/29 19:08, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 28-06-23 21:21:54, Baokun Li wrote:
>> Now when dqput() drops the last reference count, it will call
>> synchronize_srcu(&dquot_srcu) in quota_release_workfn() to ensure that
>> no other user will use the dquot after the last reference count is dropped,
>> so we don't need to call synchronize_srcu(&dquot_srcu) in drop_dquot_ref()
>> and remove the corresponding logic directly to simplify the code.
> Nice simplification!  It is also important that dqput() now cannot sleep
> which was another reason for the logic with tofree_head in
> remove_inode_dquot_ref().

I don't understand this sentence very well, so I would appreciate it

if you could explain it in detail. 🤔

> Probably this is good to mention in the
> changelog.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/quota/dquot.c | 33 ++++++---------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/quota/dquot.c b/fs/quota/dquot.c
>> index e8e702ac64e5..df028fb2ce72 100644
>> --- a/fs/quota/dquot.c
>> +++ b/fs/quota/dquot.c
>> @@ -1090,8 +1090,7 @@ static int add_dquot_ref(struct super_block *sb, int type)
>>    * Remove references to dquots from inode and add dquot to list for freeing
>>    * if we have the last reference to dquot
>>    */
>> -static void remove_inode_dquot_ref(struct inode *inode, int type,
>> -				   struct list_head *tofree_head)
>> +static void remove_inode_dquot_ref(struct inode *inode, int type)
>>   {
>>   	struct dquot **dquots = i_dquot(inode);
>>   	struct dquot *dquot = dquots[type];
>> @@ -1100,21 +1099,7 @@ static void remove_inode_dquot_ref(struct inode *inode, int type,
>>   		return;
>>   
>>   	dquots[type] = NULL;
>> -	if (list_empty(&dquot->dq_free)) {
>> -		/*
>> -		 * The inode still has reference to dquot so it can't be in the
>> -		 * free list
>> -		 */
>> -		spin_lock(&dq_list_lock);
>> -		list_add(&dquot->dq_free, tofree_head);
>> -		spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
>> -	} else {
>> -		/*
>> -		 * Dquot is already in a list to put so we won't drop the last
>> -		 * reference here.
>> -		 */
>> -		dqput(dquot);
>> -	}
>> +	dqput(dquot);
>>   }
> I think you can also just drop remove_inode_dquot_ref() as it is trivial
> now and inline it at its only callsite...
>
> 								Honza
Sure, I'll just remove it in the next version and inline the only 
remaining code
into remove_dquot_ref().

Thanks!
-- 
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li
.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-29 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-28 13:21 [PATCH v2 0/7] quota: fix race condition between dqput() and dquot_mark_dquot_dirty() Baokun Li
2023-06-28 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] quota: factor out dquot_write_dquot() Baokun Li
2023-06-28 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] quota: add new global dquot list releasing_dquots Baokun Li
2023-06-29 10:29   ` Jan Kara
2023-06-29 11:10     ` Baokun Li
2023-06-28 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] quota: rename dquot_active() to inode_dquot_active() Baokun Li
2023-06-29 10:24   ` Jan Kara
2023-06-29 11:14     ` Baokun Li
2023-06-28 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] quota: add new helper dquot_active() Baokun Li
2023-06-28 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] quota: fix dqput() to follow the guarantees dquot_srcu should provide Baokun Li
2023-06-29 10:59   ` Jan Kara
2023-06-29 11:47     ` Baokun Li
2023-06-29 14:33       ` Jan Kara
2023-06-30  7:45         ` Baokun Li
2023-06-28 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] quota: simplify drop_dquot_ref() Baokun Li
2023-06-29 11:08   ` Jan Kara
2023-06-29 12:13     ` Baokun Li [this message]
2023-06-29 14:09       ` Jan Kara
2023-06-29 14:16         ` Baokun Li
2023-06-28 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] quota: remove unused function put_dquot_list() Baokun Li
2023-06-29 11:05   ` Jan Kara
2023-06-29 12:18     ` Baokun Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d00a224e-1991-ce90-d458-45390a20f8dc@huawei.com \
    --to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®