mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [patch 08/30] x86/microcode/intel: Rip out mixed stepping support for Intel CPUs
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:37:38 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230810160805.418991257@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230810153317.850017756@linutronix.de>

From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>

Mixed steppings aren't supported on Intel CPUs. Only one patch is required
for the entire system. The caching of micro code blobs which match the
family and model is therefore pointless and in fact it is disfunctional as
CPU hotplug updates use only a single microcode blob, i.e. the one where
*intel_ucode_patch points to.

Remove the microcode cache and make it an AMD local feature.

[ tglx: Save only at the end. Otherwise random microcode ends up in the
  	pointer for early loading ]

Originally-From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c      |   10 +
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c     |    2 
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c    |  201 ++++++++-----------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h |   10 -
 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 159 deletions(-)
---
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
@@ -37,6 +37,16 @@
 
 #include "internal.h"
 
+struct ucode_patch {
+	struct list_head plist;
+	void *data;
+	unsigned int size;
+	u32 patch_id;
+	u16 equiv_cpu;
+};
+
+static LIST_HEAD(microcode_cache);
+
 static struct equiv_cpu_table {
 	unsigned int num_entries;
 	struct equiv_cpu_entry *entry;
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -46,8 +46,6 @@ static bool dis_ucode_ldr = true;
 
 bool initrd_gone;
 
-LIST_HEAD(microcode_cache);
-
 /*
  * Synchronization.
  *
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -41,10 +41,10 @@
 static const char ucode_path[] = "kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin";
 
 /* Current microcode patch used in early patching on the APs. */
-static struct microcode_intel *intel_ucode_patch;
+static struct microcode_intel *intel_ucode_patch __read_mostly;
 
 /* last level cache size per core */
-static int llc_size_per_core;
+static int llc_size_per_core __ro_after_init;
 
 int intel_cpu_collect_info(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
 {
@@ -233,81 +233,26 @@ static int has_newer_microcode(void *mc,
 	return intel_find_matching_signature(mc, csig, cpf);
 }
 
-static struct ucode_patch *memdup_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
+static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
 {
-	struct ucode_patch *p;
+	struct microcode_header_intel *p;
 
-	p = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ucode_patch), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!p)
-		return NULL;
-
-	p->data = kmemdup(data, size, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!p->data) {
-		kfree(p);
-		return NULL;
-	}
-
-	return p;
-}
-
-static void save_microcode_patch(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, void *data, unsigned int size)
-{
-	struct microcode_header_intel *mc_hdr, *mc_saved_hdr;
-	struct ucode_patch *iter, *tmp, *p = NULL;
-	bool prev_found = false;
-	unsigned int sig, pf;
-
-	mc_hdr = (struct microcode_header_intel *)data;
-
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, tmp, &microcode_cache, plist) {
-		mc_saved_hdr = (struct microcode_header_intel *)iter->data;
-		sig	     = mc_saved_hdr->sig;
-		pf	     = mc_saved_hdr->pf;
-
-		if (intel_find_matching_signature(data, sig, pf)) {
-			prev_found = true;
-
-			if (mc_hdr->rev <= mc_saved_hdr->rev)
-				continue;
-
-			p = memdup_patch(data, size);
-			if (!p)
-				pr_err("Error allocating buffer %p\n", data);
-			else {
-				list_replace(&iter->plist, &p->plist);
-				kfree(iter->data);
-				kfree(iter);
-			}
-		}
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * There weren't any previous patches found in the list cache; save the
-	 * newly found.
-	 */
-	if (!prev_found) {
-		p = memdup_patch(data, size);
-		if (!p)
-			pr_err("Error allocating buffer for %p\n", data);
-		else
-			list_add_tail(&p->plist, &microcode_cache);
-	}
+	kfree(intel_ucode_patch);
+	intel_ucode_patch = NULL;
 
+	p = kmemdup(data, size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!p)
 		return;
 
-	if (!intel_find_matching_signature(p->data, uci->cpu_sig.sig, uci->cpu_sig.pf))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Save for early loading. On 32-bit, that needs to be a physical
 	 * address as the APs are running from physical addresses, before
 	 * paging has been enabled.
 	 */
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32))
-		intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)__pa_nodebug(p->data);
+		intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)__pa_nodebug(p);
 	else
-		intel_ucode_patch = p->data;
+		intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)p;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -319,6 +264,7 @@ scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size,
 {
 	struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header;
 	struct microcode_intel *patch = NULL;
+	u32 cur_rev = uci->cpu_sig.rev;
 	unsigned int mc_size;
 
 	while (size) {
@@ -328,8 +274,7 @@ scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size,
 		mc_header = (struct microcode_header_intel *)data;
 
 		mc_size = get_totalsize(mc_header);
-		if (!mc_size ||
-		    mc_size > size ||
+		if (!mc_size || mc_size > size ||
 		    intel_microcode_sanity_check(data, false, MC_HEADER_TYPE_MICROCODE) < 0)
 			break;
 
@@ -341,31 +286,16 @@ scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size,
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		if (save) {
-			save_microcode_patch(uci, data, mc_size);
+		/* BSP scan: Check whether there is newer microcode */
+		if (save && cur_rev >= mc_header->rev)
 			goto next;
-		}
-
 
-		if (!patch) {
-			if (!has_newer_microcode(data,
-						 uci->cpu_sig.sig,
-						 uci->cpu_sig.pf,
-						 uci->cpu_sig.rev))
-				goto next;
-
-		} else {
-			struct microcode_header_intel *phdr = &patch->hdr;
-
-			if (!has_newer_microcode(data,
-						 phdr->sig,
-						 phdr->pf,
-						 phdr->rev))
-				goto next;
-		}
+		/* Save scan: Check whether there is newer or matching microcode */
+		if (save && cur_rev != mc_header->rev)
+			goto next;
 
-		/* We have a newer patch, save it. */
 		patch = data;
+		cur_rev = mc_header->rev;
 
 next:
 		data += mc_size;
@@ -374,18 +304,22 @@ scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size,
 	if (size)
 		return NULL;
 
+	if (save && patch)
+		save_microcode_patch(patch, mc_size);
+
 	return patch;
 }
 
 static void show_saved_mc(void)
 {
 #ifdef DEBUG
-	int i = 0, j;
 	unsigned int sig, pf, rev, total_size, data_size, date;
+	struct extended_sigtable *ext_header;
+	struct extended_signature *ext_sig;
 	struct ucode_cpu_info uci;
-	struct ucode_patch *p;
+	int j, ext_sigcount;
 
-	if (list_empty(&microcode_cache)) {
+	if (!intel_ucode_patch) {
 		pr_debug("no microcode data saved.\n");
 		return;
 	}
@@ -397,45 +331,34 @@ static void show_saved_mc(void)
 	rev	= uci.cpu_sig.rev;
 	pr_debug("CPU: sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, rev=0x%x\n", sig, pf, rev);
 
-	list_for_each_entry(p, &microcode_cache, plist) {
-		struct microcode_header_intel *mc_saved_header;
-		struct extended_sigtable *ext_header;
-		struct extended_signature *ext_sig;
-		int ext_sigcount;
-
-		mc_saved_header = (struct microcode_header_intel *)p->data;
-
-		sig	= mc_saved_header->sig;
-		pf	= mc_saved_header->pf;
-		rev	= mc_saved_header->rev;
-		date	= mc_saved_header->date;
-
-		total_size	= get_totalsize(mc_saved_header);
-		data_size	= intel_microcode_get_datasize(mc_saved_header);
-
-		pr_debug("mc_saved[%d]: sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, rev=0x%x, total size=0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
-			 i++, sig, pf, rev, total_size,
-			 date & 0xffff,
-			 date >> 24,
-			 (date >> 16) & 0xff);
-
-		/* Look for ext. headers: */
-		if (total_size <= data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE)
-			continue;
+	sig	= intel_ucode_patch->hdr.sig;
+	pf	= intel_ucode_patch->hdr.pf;
+	rev	= intel_ucode_patch->hdr.rev;
+	date	= intel_ucode_patch->hdr.date;
+
+	total_size	= get_totalsize(mc_saved_header);
+	data_size	= intel_microcode_get_datasize(mc_saved_header);
+
+	pr_debug("mc_saved: sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, rev=0x%x, total size=0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
+		 sig, pf, rev, total_size, date & 0xffff,
+		 date >> 24, (date >> 16) & 0xff);
 
-		ext_header = (void *)mc_saved_header + data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE;
-		ext_sigcount = ext_header->count;
-		ext_sig = (void *)ext_header + EXT_HEADER_SIZE;
+	/* Look for ext. headers: */
+	if (total_size <= data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE)
+		return;
 
-		for (j = 0; j < ext_sigcount; j++) {
-			sig = ext_sig->sig;
-			pf = ext_sig->pf;
+	ext_header = (void *)intel_ucode_patch + data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE;
+	ext_sigcount = ext_header->count;
+	ext_sig = (void *)ext_header + EXT_HEADER_SIZE;
+
+	for (j = 0; j < ext_sigcount; j++) {
+		sig = ext_sig->sig;
+		pf = ext_sig->pf;
 
-			pr_debug("\tExtended[%d]: sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x\n",
-				 j, sig, pf);
+		pr_debug("\tExtended[%d]: sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x\n",
+			 j, sig, pf);
 
-			ext_sig++;
-		}
+		ext_sig++;
 	}
 #endif
 }
@@ -451,7 +374,7 @@ static void save_mc_for_early(struct uco
 
 	mutex_lock(&x86_cpu_microcode_mutex);
 
-	save_microcode_patch(uci, mc, size);
+	save_microcode_patch(mc, size);
 	show_saved_mc();
 
 	mutex_unlock(&x86_cpu_microcode_mutex);
@@ -675,26 +598,10 @@ void load_ucode_intel_ap(void)
 	apply_microcode_early(&uci, true);
 }
 
-static struct microcode_intel *find_patch(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
+/* Accessor for microcode pointer */
+static struct microcode_intel *ucode_get_patch(void)
 {
-	struct microcode_header_intel *phdr;
-	struct ucode_patch *iter, *tmp;
-
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, tmp, &microcode_cache, plist) {
-
-		phdr = (struct microcode_header_intel *)iter->data;
-
-		if (phdr->rev <= uci->cpu_sig.rev)
-			continue;
-
-		if (!intel_find_matching_signature(phdr,
-						   uci->cpu_sig.sig,
-						   uci->cpu_sig.pf))
-			continue;
-
-		return iter->data;
-	}
-	return NULL;
+	return intel_ucode_patch;
 }
 
 void reload_ucode_intel(void)
@@ -704,7 +611,7 @@ void reload_ucode_intel(void)
 
 	intel_cpu_collect_info(&uci);
 
-	p = find_patch(&uci);
+	p = ucode_get_patch();
 	if (!p)
 		return;
 
@@ -748,7 +655,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_
 		return UCODE_ERROR;
 
 	/* Look for a newer patch in our cache: */
-	mc = find_patch(uci);
+	mc = ucode_get_patch();
 	if (!mc) {
 		mc = uci->mc;
 		if (!mc)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
@@ -8,16 +8,6 @@
 #include <asm/cpu.h>
 #include <asm/microcode.h>
 
-struct ucode_patch {
-	struct list_head plist;
-	void *data;		/* Intel uses only this one */
-	unsigned int size;
-	u32 patch_id;
-	u16 equiv_cpu;
-};
-
-extern struct list_head microcode_cache;
-
 struct device;
 
 enum ucode_state {


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-10 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-10 18:37 [patch 00/30] x86/microcode: Cleanup and late loading enhancements Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 01/30] x86/mm: Remove unused microcode.h include Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 02/30] x86/microcode: Hide the config knob Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 20:41   ` Ashok Raj
2023-08-11 11:22     ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 03/30] x86/microcode/intel: Move microcode functions out of cpu/intel.c Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 04/30] x86/microcode: Include vendor headers into microcode.h Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 05/30] x86/microcode: Make reload_early_microcode() static Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 06/30] x86/microcode/intel: Rename get_datasize() since its used externally Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 07/30] x86/microcode: Move core specific defines to local header Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-08-11 22:25   ` [patch 08/30] x86/microcode/intel: Rip out mixed stepping support for Intel CPUs Borislav Petkov
2023-08-12  7:16     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 09/30] x86/microcode/intel: Remove debug code Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11 10:45   ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 10/30] x86/microcode: Remove pointless mutex Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 11/30] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify scan_microcode() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 12/30] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify and rename generic_load_microcode() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 13/30] x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup code further Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11 11:01   ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 14/30] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify early loading Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 15/30] x86/microcode/intel: Save the microcode only after a successful late-load Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 16/30] x86/microcode/intel: Switch to kvmalloc() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 17/30] x86/microcode/intel: Unify microcode apply() functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 18/30] x86/microcode: Handle "nosmt" correctly Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 19/30] x86/microcode: Clarify the late load logic Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 20/30] x86/microcode: Sanitize __wait_for_cpus() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 21/30] x86/microcode: Add per CPU result state Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 22/30] x86/microcode: Add per CPU control field Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 23/30] x86/microcode: Provide new control functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 20:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 24/30] x86/microcode: Replace the all in one rendevouz handler Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 25/30] x86/microcode: Rendezvous and load in NMI Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 26/30] x86/microcode: Protect against instrumentation Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 20:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-11  9:19     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 27/30] x86/apic: Provide apic_force_nmi_on_cpu() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 28/30] x86/microcode: Handle "offline" CPUs correctly Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 20:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 20:50     ` Ashok Raj
2023-08-10 21:05       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 21:49         ` Ashok Raj
2023-08-10 22:29           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 23:02             ` Ashok Raj
2023-08-11  1:19               ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11  1:31                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11  9:36     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 16:47       ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 29/30] x86/microcode: Prepare for minimal revision check Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 20:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-11  9:38     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11 14:20     ` Arjan van de Ven
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 30/30] x86/microcode/intel: Add a minimum required revision for late-loads Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230810160805.418991257@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome