From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [patch 16/30] x86/microcode/intel: Switch to kvmalloc()
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:37:49 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230810160805.875358976@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230810153317.850017756@linutronix.de>
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Microcode blobs are getting larger and might soon reach the kmalloc()
limit. Switch over kvmalloc().
32-bit has to stay with kmalloc() as it needs physically contiguous memory
because the early loading runs before paging is enabled, so there is a
sanity check added to ensure that.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
---
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
#include <linux/earlycpio.h>
#include <linux/firmware.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
-#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/initrd.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -215,7 +214,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_microcode_sanity
static void update_ucode_pointer(struct microcode_intel *mc)
{
- kfree(ucode_patch_va);
+ kvfree(ucode_patch_va);
/*
* Save the virtual address for early loading on 64bit
@@ -229,13 +228,18 @@ static void update_ucode_pointer(struct
static void save_microcode_patch(struct microcode_intel *patch)
{
- struct microcode_intel *mc;
+ unsigned int size = get_totalsize(&patch->hdr);
+ struct microcode_intel *mc = NULL;
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64))
+ mc = kvmemdup(patch, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ else
+ mc = kmemdup(patch, size, GFP_KERNEL);
- mc = kmemdup(patch, get_totalsize(&patch->hdr), GFP_KERNEL);
if (mc)
update_ucode_pointer(mc);
else
- pr_err("Unable to allocate microcode memory\n");
+ pr_err("Unable to allocate microcode memory size: %u\n", size);
}
/* Scan CPIO for microcode matching the boot CPUs family, model, stepping */
@@ -586,36 +590,34 @@ static enum ucode_state read_ucode_intel
if (!copy_from_iter_full(&mc_header, sizeof(mc_header), iter)) {
pr_err("error! Truncated or inaccessible header in microcode data file\n");
- break;
+ goto fail;
}
mc_size = get_totalsize(&mc_header);
if (mc_size < sizeof(mc_header)) {
pr_err("error! Bad data in microcode data file (totalsize too small)\n");
- break;
+ goto fail;
}
-
data_size = mc_size - sizeof(mc_header);
if (data_size > iov_iter_count(iter)) {
pr_err("error! Bad data in microcode data file (truncated file?)\n");
- break;
+ goto fail;
}
/* For performance reasons, reuse mc area when possible */
if (!mc || mc_size > curr_mc_size) {
- vfree(mc);
- mc = vmalloc(mc_size);
+ kvfree(mc);
+ mc = kvmalloc(mc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!mc)
- break;
+ goto fail;
curr_mc_size = mc_size;
}
memcpy(mc, &mc_header, sizeof(mc_header));
data = mc + sizeof(mc_header);
if (!copy_from_iter_full(data, data_size, iter) ||
- intel_microcode_sanity_check(mc, true, MC_HEADER_TYPE_MICROCODE) < 0) {
- break;
- }
+ intel_microcode_sanity_check(mc, true, MC_HEADER_TYPE_MICROCODE) < 0)
+ goto fail;
if (cur_rev >= mc_header.rev)
continue;
@@ -623,25 +625,32 @@ static enum ucode_state read_ucode_intel
if (!intel_find_matching_signature(mc, uci->cpu_sig.sig, uci->cpu_sig.pf))
continue;
- vfree(new_mc);
+ kvfree(new_mc);
cur_rev = mc_header.rev;
new_mc = mc;
new_mc_size = mc_size;
mc = NULL;
}
- vfree(mc);
+ if (iov_iter_count(iter))
+ goto fail;
- if (iov_iter_count(iter)) {
- vfree(new_mc);
- return UCODE_ERROR;
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32) && new_mc && is_vmalloc_addr(new_mc)) {
+ pr_err("Microcode too large for 32-bit mode\n");
+ goto fail;
}
+ kvfree(mc);
if (!new_mc)
return UCODE_NFOUND;
ucode_patch_late = (struct microcode_intel *)new_mc;
return UCODE_NEW;
+
+fail:
+ kvfree(mc);
+ kvfree(new_mc);
+ return UCODE_ERROR;
}
static bool is_blacklisted(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -700,9 +709,9 @@ static enum ucode_state request_microcod
static void finalize_late_load(int result)
{
if (!result)
- save_microcode_patch(ucode_patch_late);
-
- vfree(ucode_patch_late);
+ update_ucode_pointer(ucode_patch_late);
+ else
+ kvfree(ucode_patch_late);
ucode_patch_late = NULL;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-10 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-10 18:37 [patch 00/30] x86/microcode: Cleanup and late loading enhancements Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 01/30] x86/mm: Remove unused microcode.h include Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 02/30] x86/microcode: Hide the config knob Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 20:41 ` Ashok Raj
2023-08-11 11:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 03/30] x86/microcode/intel: Move microcode functions out of cpu/intel.c Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 04/30] x86/microcode: Include vendor headers into microcode.h Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 05/30] x86/microcode: Make reload_early_microcode() static Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 06/30] x86/microcode/intel: Rename get_datasize() since its used externally Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 07/30] x86/microcode: Move core specific defines to local header Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 08/30] x86/microcode/intel: Rip out mixed stepping support for Intel CPUs Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11 22:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-12 7:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 09/30] x86/microcode/intel: Remove debug code Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11 10:45 ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 10/30] x86/microcode: Remove pointless mutex Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 11/30] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify scan_microcode() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 12/30] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify and rename generic_load_microcode() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 13/30] x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup code further Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11 11:01 ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 14/30] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify early loading Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 15/30] x86/microcode/intel: Save the microcode only after a successful late-load Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 17/30] x86/microcode/intel: Unify microcode apply() functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 18/30] x86/microcode: Handle "nosmt" correctly Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 19/30] x86/microcode: Clarify the late load logic Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 20/30] x86/microcode: Sanitize __wait_for_cpus() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 21/30] x86/microcode: Add per CPU result state Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:37 ` [patch 22/30] x86/microcode: Add per CPU control field Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 23/30] x86/microcode: Provide new control functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 20:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 24/30] x86/microcode: Replace the all in one rendevouz handler Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 25/30] x86/microcode: Rendezvous and load in NMI Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 26/30] x86/microcode: Protect against instrumentation Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 20:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-11 9:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 27/30] x86/apic: Provide apic_force_nmi_on_cpu() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 28/30] x86/microcode: Handle "offline" CPUs correctly Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 20:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 20:50 ` Ashok Raj
2023-08-10 21:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 21:49 ` Ashok Raj
2023-08-10 22:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-10 23:02 ` Ashok Raj
2023-08-11 1:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11 1:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11 9:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-12 16:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 29/30] x86/microcode: Prepare for minimal revision check Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-10 20:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-11 9:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11 14:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
2023-08-10 18:38 ` [patch 30/30] x86/microcode/intel: Add a minimum required revision for late-loads Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230810160805.875358976@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome