mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com,
	kernel-team@meta.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] workqueue: Replace pwq_activate_inactive_work() with [__]pwq_activate_work()
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 14:28:47 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240113002911.406791-4-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240113002911.406791-1-tj@kernel.org>

To prepare for unbound nr_active handling improvements, move work activation
part of pwq_activate_inactive_work() into __pwq_activate_work() and add
pwq_activate_work() which tests WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE and updates nr_active.

pwq_activate_first_inactive() and try_to_grab_pending() are updated to use
pwq_activate_work(). The latter conversion is functionally identical. For
the former, this conversion adds an unnecessary WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE
testing. This is temporary and will be removed by the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 09f0ec086726..2cd275b34df2 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1461,16 +1461,36 @@ static bool pwq_is_empty(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
 	return !pwq->nr_active && list_empty(&pwq->inactive_works);
 }
 
-static void pwq_activate_inactive_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void __pwq_activate_work(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
+				struct work_struct *work)
 {
-	struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_work_pwq(work);
-
 	trace_workqueue_activate_work(work);
 	if (list_empty(&pwq->pool->worklist))
 		pwq->pool->watchdog_ts = jiffies;
 	move_linked_works(work, &pwq->pool->worklist, NULL);
 	__clear_bit(WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE_BIT, work_data_bits(work));
+}
+
+/**
+ * pwq_activate_work - Activate a work item if inactive
+ * @pwq: pool_workqueue @work belongs to
+ * @work: work item to activate
+ *
+ * Returns %true if activated. %false if already active.
+ */
+static bool pwq_activate_work(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
+			      struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct worker_pool *pool = pwq->pool;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&pool->lock);
+
+	if (!(*work_data_bits(work) & WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE))
+		return false;
+
 	pwq->nr_active++;
+	__pwq_activate_work(pwq, work);
+	return true;
 }
 
 static void pwq_activate_first_inactive(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
@@ -1478,7 +1498,7 @@ static void pwq_activate_first_inactive(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
 	struct work_struct *work = list_first_entry(&pwq->inactive_works,
 						    struct work_struct, entry);
 
-	pwq_activate_inactive_work(work);
+	pwq_activate_work(pwq, work);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1616,8 +1636,7 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork,
 		 * management later on and cause stall.  Make sure the work
 		 * item is activated before grabbing.
 		 */
-		if (*work_data_bits(work) & WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE)
-			pwq_activate_inactive_work(work);
+		pwq_activate_work(pwq, work);
 
 		list_del_init(&work->entry);
 		pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(pwq, *work_data_bits(work));
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-13  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-13  0:28 [PATCHSET v2 wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:28 ` [PATCH 1/9] workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:28 ` [PATCH 2/9] workqueue: Factor out pwq_is_empty() Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-01-13  0:28 ` [PATCH 4/9] workqueue: Move nr_active handling into helpers Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:28 ` [PATCH 5/9] workqueue: Make wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs while activating Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:28 ` [PATCH 6/9] workqueue: Add first_possible_node and node_nr_cpus[] Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:28 ` [PATCH 7/9] workqueue: Move pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() to the end of work item handling Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:28 ` [PATCH 8/9] workqueue: Introduce struct wq_node_nr_active Tejun Heo
2024-01-19  7:55   ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-01-24  0:13     ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:28 ` [PATCH 9/9] workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2024-01-19  7:54   ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-01-24  0:30     ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-24  2:54       ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-01-25 16:18         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240113002911.406791-4-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®