From: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, brgerst@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v3A 4/4] x86/cpufeatures: Use AWK to generate {REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 02:32:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240624093236.18543-1-xin@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMzpN2hMP8c9PXy=0YV4Ln+u_1n1spJP2jaYXKzEABWLh0+hkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Generate macros {REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET in the newly added AWK
script that generates the required and disabled feature mask header.
Suggested-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@zytor.com>
---
Change since v3:
* Checking NCAPINTS isn't necessary anymore. It was needed when these
macros had to be manually updated, but now if cpufeatures.h changes
this header will be regenerated (Brian Gerst).
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 69 -------------------------------
arch/x86/tools/featuremasks.awk | 9 +++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 8332f596ba3c..8161dfb3255c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -55,75 +55,6 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[NBUGINTS*32];
#define test_cpu_cap(c, bit) \
arch_test_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)((c)->x86_capability))
-/*
- * There are 32 bits/features in each mask word. The high bits
- * (selected with (bit>>5) give us the word number and the low 5
- * bits give us the bit/feature number inside the word.
- * (1UL<<((bit)&31) gives us a mask for the feature_bit so we can
- * see if it is set in the mask word.
- */
-#define CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(maskname, word, bit) \
- (((bit)>>5)==(word) && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & maskname##word ))
-
-/*
- * {REQUIRED,DISABLED}_MASK_CHECK below may seem duplicated with the
- * following BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO() check but when NCAPINTS gets changed, all
- * header macros which use NCAPINTS need to be changed. The duplicated macro
- * use causes the compiler to issue errors for all headers so that all usage
- * sites can be corrected.
- */
-#define REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET(feature_bit) \
- ( CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 0, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 1, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 2, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 3, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 4, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 5, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 6, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 7, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 8, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 9, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 10, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 11, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 12, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 13, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 14, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 15, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 16, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 17, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 18, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 19, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 20, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(REQUIRED_MASK, 21, feature_bit) || \
- REQUIRED_MASK_CHECK || \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != 22))
-
-#define DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(feature_bit) \
- ( CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 0, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 1, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 2, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 3, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 4, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 5, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 6, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 7, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 8, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 9, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 10, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 11, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 12, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 13, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 14, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 15, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 16, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 17, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 18, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 19, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 20, feature_bit) || \
- CHECK_BIT_IN_MASK_WORD(DISABLED_MASK, 21, feature_bit) || \
- DISABLED_MASK_CHECK || \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != 22))
-
#define cpu_has(c, bit) \
(__builtin_constant_p(bit) && REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 1 : \
test_cpu_cap(c, bit))
diff --git a/arch/x86/tools/featuremasks.awk b/arch/x86/tools/featuremasks.awk
index 989b021e73d3..2a936411c219 100755
--- a/arch/x86/tools/featuremasks.awk
+++ b/arch/x86/tools/featuremasks.awk
@@ -77,7 +77,14 @@ END {
printf "#define %s_MASK%d\t0x%08x\n", s, i, masks[i];
}
- printf "#define %s_MASK_CHECK BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(NCAPINTS != %d)\n\n", s, ncapints;
+ printf "\n#define %s_MASK_BIT_SET(x)\t\t\t\\\n", s;
+ printf "\t((\t\t\t\t\t";
+ for (i = 0; i < ncapints; i++) {
+ if (masks[i])
+ printf "\t\\\n\t\t((x) >> 5) == %2d ? %s_MASK%d :", i, s, i;
+ }
+ printf " 0\t\\\n";
+ printf "\t) & (1 << ((x) & 31)))\n";
}
printf "#endif /* _ASM_X86_FEATUREMASKS_H */\n";
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-24 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-22 17:14 [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/cpufeatures: Automatically generate required and disabled feature masks Xin Li (Intel)
2024-06-22 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/cpufeatures: Add {required,disabled} feature configs Xin Li (Intel)
2024-06-22 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/cpufeatures: Generate a feature mask header based on build config Xin Li (Intel)
2024-06-26 11:36 ` Nikolay Borisov
2024-06-27 16:45 ` Xin Li
2024-06-22 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/cpufeatures: Remove {disabled,required}-features.h Xin Li (Intel)
2024-06-22 17:14 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] x86/cpufeatures: Use AWK to generate {REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET Xin Li (Intel)
2024-06-23 20:28 ` Brian Gerst
2024-06-24 7:29 ` Xin Li
2024-06-24 10:24 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-06-24 17:42 ` Xin Li
2024-06-25 5:22 ` [PATCH v3B " Xin Li (Intel)
2024-06-27 18:39 ` Brian Gerst
2024-06-24 9:32 ` Xin Li (Intel) [this message]
2024-06-27 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 " Xin Li
2024-06-22 17:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/cpufeatures: Automatically generate required and disabled feature masks Xin Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240624093236.18543-1-xin@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®