mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	 Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
	Ackerly Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 15/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Move event re-injection unprotect+retry into common path
Date: Fri,  9 Aug 2024 12:03:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240809190319.1710470-16-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240809190319.1710470-1-seanjc@google.com>

Move the event re-injection unprotect+retry logic into
kvm_mmu_write_protect_fault(), i.e. unprotect and retry if and only if
the #PF actually hit a write-protected gfn.  Note, there is a small
possibility that the gfn was unprotected by a different tasking between
hitting the #PF and acquiring mmu_lock, but in that case, KVM will resume
the guest immediately anyways because KVM will treat the fault as spurious.

As a bonus, unprotecting _after_ handling the page fault also addresses the
case where the installing a SPTE to handle fault encounters a shadowed PTE,
i.e. *creates* a read-only SPTE.

Opportunstically add a comment explaining what on earth the intent of the
code is, as based on the changelog from commit 577bdc496614 ("KVM: Avoid
instruction emulation when event delivery is pending").

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 28 ++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index f64ad36ca9e0..d3c0220ff7ee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -2753,23 +2753,6 @@ bool kvm_mmu_unprotect_gfn_and_retry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa)
 	return r;
 }
 
-static int kvm_mmu_unprotect_page_virt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
-{
-	gpa_t gpa;
-	int r;
-
-	if (vcpu->arch.mmu->root_role.direct)
-		return 0;
-
-	gpa = kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_write(vcpu, gva, NULL);
-	if (gpa == INVALID_GPA)
-		return 0;
-
-	r = kvm_mmu_unprotect_page(vcpu->kvm, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-
-	return r;
-}
-
 static void kvm_unsync_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 {
 	trace_kvm_mmu_unsync_page(sp);
@@ -4640,8 +4623,6 @@ int kvm_handle_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 error_code,
 	if (!flags) {
 		trace_kvm_page_fault(vcpu, fault_address, error_code);
 
-		if (kvm_event_needs_reinjection(vcpu))
-			kvm_mmu_unprotect_page_virt(vcpu, fault_address);
 		r = kvm_mmu_page_fault(vcpu, fault_address, error_code, insn,
 				insn_len);
 	} else if (flags & KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_NOT_PRESENT) {
@@ -6037,8 +6018,15 @@ static int kvm_mmu_write_protect_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
 	 * execute the instruction.  If no shadow pages were zapped, then the
 	 * write-fault is due to something else entirely, i.e. KVM needs to
 	 * emulate, as resuming the guest will put it into an infinite loop.
+	 *
+	 * For indirect MMUs, i.e. if KVM is shadowing the current MMU, try to
+	 * unprotect the gfn and retry if an event is awaiting reinjection.  If
+	 * KVM emulates multiple instructions before completing even injection,
+	 * the event could be delayed beyond what is architecturally allowed,
+	 * e.g. KVM could inject an IRQ after the TPR has been raised.
 	 */
-	if (direct && (is_write_to_guest_page_table(error_code)) &&
+	if (((direct && is_write_to_guest_page_table(error_code)) ||
+	     (!direct && kvm_event_needs_reinjection(vcpu))) &&
 	    kvm_mmu_unprotect_gfn_and_retry(vcpu, cr2_or_gpa))
 		return RET_PF_FIXED;
 
-- 
2.46.0.76.ge559c4bf1a-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-09 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-09 19:02 [PATCH 00/22] KVM: x86: Fix multiple #PF RO infinite loop bugs Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:02 ` [PATCH 01/22] KVM: x86: Disallow read-only memslots for SEV-ES and SEV-SNP (and TDX) Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 16:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-12-03 13:04   ` Naveen N Rao
2025-12-23 16:06     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:02 ` [PATCH 02/22] KVM: VMX: Set PFERR_GUEST_{FINAL,PAGE}_MASK if and only if the GVA is valid Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 11:11   ` Yuan Yao
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 03/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Trigger unprotect logic only on write-protection page faults Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 11:42   ` Yuan Yao
2024-08-14 14:21     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-15  8:30       ` Yuan Yao
2024-08-14 16:40   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-08-14 19:34     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 04/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip emulation on page fault iff 1+ SPs were unprotected Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 14:22   ` Yuan Yao
2024-08-15 23:31     ` Yao Yuan
2024-08-23  0:39       ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-23 23:46         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-26 20:28           ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 16:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 05/22] KVM: x86: Retry to-be-emulated insn in "slow" unprotect path iff sp is zapped Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 06/22] KVM: x86: Get RIP from vCPU state when storing it to last_retry_eip Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 17:01   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 07/22] KVM: x86: Store gpa as gpa_t, not unsigned long, when unprotecting for retry Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 08/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Apply retry protection to "fast nTDP unprotect" path Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 09/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Try "unprotect for retry" iff there are indirect SPs Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 17:30   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-08-15 14:09     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-15 16:48       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-08-28 23:28         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 10/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace PFERR_NESTED_GUEST_PAGE with a more descriptive helper Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 17:32   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-08-15 14:10     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 11/22] KVM: x86: Move EMULTYPE_ALLOW_RETRY_PF to x86_emulate_instruction() Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 12/22] KVM: x86: Fold retry_instruction() into x86_emulate_instruction() Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 13/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't try to unprotect an INVALID_GPA Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 14/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Always walk guest PTEs with WRITE access when unprotecting Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-08-14 17:43   ` [PATCH 15/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Move event re-injection unprotect+retry into common path Paolo Bonzini
2024-08-26 21:52     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 16/22] KVM: x86: Remove manual pfn lookup when retrying #PF after failed emulation Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 17:50   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 17/22] KVM: x86: Check EMULTYPE_WRITE_PF_TO_SP before unprotecting gfn Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 17:53   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: x86: Apply retry protection to "unprotect on failure" path Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 19/22] KVM: x86: Update retry protection fields when forcing retry on emulation failure Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 20/22] KVM: x86: Rename reexecute_instruction()=>kvm_unprotect_and_retry_on_failure() Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 21/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Subsume kvm_mmu_unprotect_page() into the and_retry() version Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 19:03 ` [PATCH 22/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Detect if unprotect will do anything based on invalid_list Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 17:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-08-15 14:25     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-30 23:54       ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 17:58 ` [PATCH 00/22] KVM: x86: Fix multiple #PF RO infinite loop bugs Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240809190319.1710470-16-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®