From: Baichuan Qi <zghbqbc@gmail.com>
To: markus.elfring@web.de
Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, jjohnson@kernel.org,
kvalo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, zghbqbc@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: Fix NULL pointer check in ath11k_ce_rx_post_pipe()
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 10:33:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241126023349.46421-1-zghbqbc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b1b5c12-3f81-4004-8eb4-44a9fbcc7223@web.de>
Change the OR to AND.
The previous code used OR within parentheses to check for
NON-NULL pointer on one of pipe->dest_ring and pipe->status_ring.
The previous code can not guarantee the pipe->dest_ring pointer
is NON-NULL. When certain errors occur, causing pipe->dest_ring
to be NULL while pipe->status_ring remains NON-NULL ,
the subsequent call to ath11k_ce_rx_buf_enqueue_pipe() will
access the NULL pointer, resulting in a driver crash.
If it is assumed that these two pointers will not become NULL
for any reason , then only need to check pipe->dest_ring is or
not a NULL pointer, and no need to check NULL pointer
on pipe->status_ring.
Signed-off-by: Baichuan Qi <zghbqbc@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/ce.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/ce.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/ce.c
index e66e86bdec20..cc9ad014d800 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/ce.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/ce.c
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int ath11k_ce_rx_post_pipe(struct ath11k_ce_pipe *pipe)
dma_addr_t paddr;
int ret = 0;
- if (!(pipe->dest_ring || pipe->status_ring))
+ if (!(pipe->dest_ring && pipe->status_ring))
return 0;
spin_lock_bh(&ab->ce.ce_lock);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-26 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-25 5:08 Baichuan Qi
2024-11-25 10:34 ` Markus Elfring
2024-11-26 2:33 ` Baichuan Qi [this message]
2024-11-26 13:44 ` Markus Elfring
2024-11-27 3:28 ` zgBCQ
2024-11-27 12:40 ` Markus Elfring
2024-11-27 14:35 ` Re: wifi: ath11k: Fix NULL pointer check in ath11k_ce_rx_post_pipe() ERROR code Baichuan Qi
2024-11-27 14:38 ` [PATCH v5] wifi: ath11k: Fix NULL pointer check in ath11k_ce_rx_post_pipe() Baichuan Qi
2024-11-27 15:23 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2024-11-28 6:09 ` Re: [PATCH v5] NAK Baichuan Qi
2024-11-27 3:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] wifi: ath11k: Fix NULL pointer check in ath11k_ce_rx_post_pipe() Baichuan Qi
2024-11-27 9:05 ` [PATCH v4?] " Markus Elfring
2024-11-27 9:43 ` [PATCH v3] " Baichuan Qi
2024-11-27 10:30 ` Kang Yang
2024-11-27 12:00 ` Baichuan Qi
2024-11-27 10:36 ` [PATCH v4?] " Markus Elfring
2024-11-27 11:43 ` [PATCH v4] " Baichuan Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241126023349.46421-1-zghbqbc@gmail.com \
--to=zghbqbc@gmail.com \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=jjohnson@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus.elfring@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®