mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix rq lock state in hotplug ops
@ 2025-04-28 21:43 Andrea Righi
  2025-04-29  0:00 ` Changwoo Min
  2025-04-29 18:02 ` Tejun Heo
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Righi @ 2025-04-28 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo, David Vernet, Changwoo Min; +Cc: linux-kernel

The ops.cpu_online() and ops.cpu_offline() callbacks incorrectly assume
that the rq involved in the operation is locked, which is not the case
during hotplug, triggering the following warning:

  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 20 at kernel/sched/sched.h:1504 handle_hotplug+0x280/0x340

Fix by not tracking the target rq as locked in the context of
ops.cpu_online() and ops.cpu_offline().

Fixes: 18853ba782bef ("sched_ext: Track currently locked rq")
Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
 kernel/sched/ext.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index ac79067dc87e6..d0f40fd258752 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -3477,9 +3477,9 @@ static void handle_hotplug(struct rq *rq, bool online)
 		scx_idle_update_selcpu_topology(&scx_ops);
 
 	if (online && SCX_HAS_OP(cpu_online))
-		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_UNLOCKED, cpu_online, rq, cpu);
+		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_UNLOCKED, cpu_online, NULL, cpu);
 	else if (!online && SCX_HAS_OP(cpu_offline))
-		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_UNLOCKED, cpu_offline, rq, cpu);
+		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_UNLOCKED, cpu_offline, NULL, cpu);
 	else
 		scx_ops_exit(SCX_ECODE_ACT_RESTART | SCX_ECODE_RSN_HOTPLUG,
 			     "cpu %d going %s, exiting scheduler", cpu,
-- 
2.49.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix rq lock state in hotplug ops
  2025-04-28 21:43 [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix rq lock state in hotplug ops Andrea Righi
@ 2025-04-29  0:00 ` Changwoo Min
  2025-04-29 18:02 ` Tejun Heo
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Changwoo Min @ 2025-04-29  0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrea Righi, Tejun Heo, David Vernet; +Cc: linux-kernel

Hi Andrea,

Thanks for the fix. Now it cleanly passes the hotplug selftest.

Tested-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>

On 4/29/25 06:43, Andrea Righi wrote:
> The ops.cpu_online() and ops.cpu_offline() callbacks incorrectly assume
> that the rq involved in the operation is locked, which is not the case
> during hotplug, triggering the following warning:
> 
>    WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 20 at kernel/sched/sched.h:1504 handle_hotplug+0x280/0x340
> 
> Fix by not tracking the target rq as locked in the context of
> ops.cpu_online() and ops.cpu_offline().
> 
> Fixes: 18853ba782bef ("sched_ext: Track currently locked rq")
> Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   kernel/sched/ext.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index ac79067dc87e6..d0f40fd258752 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -3477,9 +3477,9 @@ static void handle_hotplug(struct rq *rq, bool online)
>   		scx_idle_update_selcpu_topology(&scx_ops);
>   
>   	if (online && SCX_HAS_OP(cpu_online))
> -		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_UNLOCKED, cpu_online, rq, cpu);
> +		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_UNLOCKED, cpu_online, NULL, cpu);
>   	else if (!online && SCX_HAS_OP(cpu_offline))
> -		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_UNLOCKED, cpu_offline, rq, cpu);
> +		SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_UNLOCKED, cpu_offline, NULL, cpu);
>   	else
>   		scx_ops_exit(SCX_ECODE_ACT_RESTART | SCX_ECODE_RSN_HOTPLUG,
>   			     "cpu %d going %s, exiting scheduler", cpu,


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix rq lock state in hotplug ops
  2025-04-28 21:43 [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix rq lock state in hotplug ops Andrea Righi
  2025-04-29  0:00 ` Changwoo Min
@ 2025-04-29 18:02 ` Tejun Heo
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2025-04-29 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrea Righi; +Cc: David Vernet, Changwoo Min, linux-kernel

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 11:43:20PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> The ops.cpu_online() and ops.cpu_offline() callbacks incorrectly assume
> that the rq involved in the operation is locked, which is not the case
> during hotplug, triggering the following warning:
> 
>   WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 20 at kernel/sched/sched.h:1504 handle_hotplug+0x280/0x340
> 
> Fix by not tracking the target rq as locked in the context of
> ops.cpu_online() and ops.cpu_offline().
> 
> Fixes: 18853ba782bef ("sched_ext: Track currently locked rq")
> Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>

Applied to sched_ext/for-6.15-fixes.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-29 18:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-28 21:43 [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix rq lock state in hotplug ops Andrea Righi
2025-04-29  0:00 ` Changwoo Min
2025-04-29 18:02 ` Tejun Heo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®