mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	vschneid@redhat.com, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: scheduler performance regression since v6.11
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 16:54:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250521145447.GA31726@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520193831.GB39944@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 09:38:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 04:38:09PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> 
> > 3840cbe24cf0 - sched: psi: fix bogus pressure spikes from aggregation race
> > 
> > With CONFIG_PSI enabled we call cpu_clock(cpu) now multiple times (up to
> > 4 times per task switch in my setup) in:
> > 
> > __schedule() -> psi_sched_switch() -> psi_task_switch() ->
> > psi_group_change().
> > 
> > There seems to be another/other v6.12 related patch(es) later which
> > cause(s) another 4% regression I yet have to discover.
> 
> Urgh, let me add this to the pile to look at. Thanks!

Does something like the compile tested only hackery below work?

---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c
index 1396674fa722..98c50bd4ce76 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/psi.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
@@ -768,30 +768,20 @@ static void record_times(struct psi_group_cpu *groupc, u64 now)
 		groupc->times[PSI_NONIDLE] += delta;
 }
 
+#define for_each_group(iter, group) \
+	for (typeof(group) iter = group; iter; iter = iter->parent)
+
 static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
 			     unsigned int clear, unsigned int set,
-			     bool wake_clock)
+			     u64 now, bool wake_clock)
 {
 	struct psi_group_cpu *groupc;
 	unsigned int t, m;
 	u32 state_mask;
-	u64 now;
 
 	lockdep_assert_rq_held(cpu_rq(cpu));
 	groupc = per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu);
 
-	/*
-	 * First we update the task counts according to the state
-	 * change requested through the @clear and @set bits.
-	 *
-	 * Then if the cgroup PSI stats accounting enabled, we
-	 * assess the aggregate resource states this CPU's tasks
-	 * have been in since the last change, and account any
-	 * SOME and FULL time these may have resulted in.
-	 */
-	write_seqcount_begin(&groupc->seq);
-	now = cpu_clock(cpu);
-
 	/*
 	 * Start with TSK_ONCPU, which doesn't have a corresponding
 	 * task count - it's just a boolean flag directly encoded in
@@ -843,7 +833,6 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
 
 		groupc->state_mask = state_mask;
 
-		write_seqcount_end(&groupc->seq);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -864,8 +853,6 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
 
 	groupc->state_mask = state_mask;
 
-	write_seqcount_end(&groupc->seq);
-
 	if (state_mask & group->rtpoll_states)
 		psi_schedule_rtpoll_work(group, 1, false);
 
@@ -901,6 +888,7 @@ void psi_task_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
 {
 	int cpu = task_cpu(task);
 	struct psi_group *group;
+	u64 now;
 
 	if (!task->pid)
 		return;
@@ -908,16 +896,31 @@ void psi_task_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
 	psi_flags_change(task, clear, set);
 
 	group = task_psi_group(task);
-	do {
-		psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, true);
-	} while ((group = group->parent));
+
+	for_each_group(tmp, group)
+		raw_write_seqcount_begin(&per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+
+	now = cpu_clock(cpu);
+
+	for_each_group(tmp, group) {
+		psi_group_change(tmp, cpu, clear, set, now, true);
+		raw_write_seqcount_end(&per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+	}
 }
 
 void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
 		     bool sleep)
 {
-	struct psi_group *group, *common = NULL;
+	struct psi_group *prev_group = task_psi_group(prev);
+	struct psi_group *next_group = task_psi_group(next);
+	struct psi_group *common = NULL;
 	int cpu = task_cpu(prev);
+	u64 now;
+
+	if (prev->pid) {
+		for_each_group(tmp, prev_group)
+			raw_write_seqcount_begin(&per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+	}
 
 	if (next->pid) {
 		psi_flags_change(next, 0, TSK_ONCPU);
@@ -926,16 +929,27 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
 		 * ancestors with @prev, those will already have @prev's
 		 * TSK_ONCPU bit set, and we can stop the iteration there.
 		 */
-		group = task_psi_group(next);
-		do {
-			if (per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu)->state_mask &
-			    PSI_ONCPU) {
-				common = group;
+
+		for_each_group(tmp, next_group) {
+			struct psi_group_cpu *groupc = per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu);
+
+			if (groupc->state_mask & PSI_ONCPU) {
+				common = tmp;
 				break;
 			}
+			raw_write_seqcount_begin(&per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+		}
+	}
+
+	now = cpu_clock(cpu);
 
-			psi_group_change(group, cpu, 0, TSK_ONCPU, true);
-		} while ((group = group->parent));
+	if (next->pid) {
+		for_each_group(tmp, next_group) {
+			if (tmp == common)
+				break;
+			psi_group_change(tmp, cpu, 0, TSK_ONCPU, now, true);
+			raw_write_seqcount_end(&per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (prev->pid) {
@@ -968,12 +982,12 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
 
 		psi_flags_change(prev, clear, set);
 
-		group = task_psi_group(prev);
-		do {
-			if (group == common)
+		for_each_group(tmp, prev_group) {
+			if (tmp == common)
 				break;
-			psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, wake_clock);
-		} while ((group = group->parent));
+			psi_group_change(tmp, cpu, clear, set, now, wake_clock);
+			raw_write_seqcount_end(&per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+		}
 
 		/*
 		 * TSK_ONCPU is handled up to the common ancestor. If there are
@@ -983,8 +997,10 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
 		 */
 		if ((prev->psi_flags ^ next->psi_flags) & ~TSK_ONCPU) {
 			clear &= ~TSK_ONCPU;
-			for (; group; group = group->parent)
-				psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, wake_clock);
+			for_each_group(tmp, common) {
+				psi_group_change(tmp, cpu, clear, set, now, wake_clock);
+				raw_write_seqcount_end(&per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+			}
 		}
 	}
 }
@@ -1221,12 +1237,14 @@ void psi_cgroup_restart(struct psi_group *group)
 		return;
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
-		struct rq_flags rf;
+		u64 now;
 
-		rq_lock_irq(rq, &rf);
-		psi_group_change(group, cpu, 0, 0, true);
-		rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf);
+		guard(rq_lock_irq)(cpu_rq(cpu));
+
+		raw_write_seqcount_begin(&per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+		now = cpu_clock(cpu);
+		psi_group_change(group, cpu, 0, 0, now, true);
+		raw_write_seqcount_end(&per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
 	}
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUPS */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-21 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-07 23:13 Chris Mason
2025-05-09 19:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-12 18:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-12 19:39     ` Chris Mason
2025-05-12 22:35       ` Chris Mason
2025-05-13  7:15         ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-16 10:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 14:38           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-05-20 14:53             ` Chris Mason
2025-05-21 13:59               ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-05-21 14:32                 ` Chris Mason
2025-05-20 19:38             ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-21 14:02               ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-05-21 15:02                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-21 19:00                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-21 14:54               ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-05-22  8:48                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-22 15:00                   ` Johannes Weiner
2025-05-23 15:40                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-23 12:27                   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-07-10 12:46                   ` [tip: sched/core] sched/psi: Optimize psi_group_change() cpu_clock() usage tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250521145447.GA31726@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®