From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
vschneid@redhat.com, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: scheduler performance regression since v6.11
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 16:54:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250521145447.GA31726@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520193831.GB39944@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 09:38:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 04:38:09PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>
> > 3840cbe24cf0 - sched: psi: fix bogus pressure spikes from aggregation race
> >
> > With CONFIG_PSI enabled we call cpu_clock(cpu) now multiple times (up to
> > 4 times per task switch in my setup) in:
> >
> > __schedule() -> psi_sched_switch() -> psi_task_switch() ->
> > psi_group_change().
> >
> > There seems to be another/other v6.12 related patch(es) later which
> > cause(s) another 4% regression I yet have to discover.
>
> Urgh, let me add this to the pile to look at. Thanks!
Does something like the compile tested only hackery below work?
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c
index 1396674fa722..98c50bd4ce76 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/psi.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
@@ -768,30 +768,20 @@ static void record_times(struct psi_group_cpu *groupc, u64 now)
groupc->times[PSI_NONIDLE] += delta;
}
+#define for_each_group(iter, group) \
+ for (typeof(group) iter = group; iter; iter = iter->parent)
+
static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
unsigned int clear, unsigned int set,
- bool wake_clock)
+ u64 now, bool wake_clock)
{
struct psi_group_cpu *groupc;
unsigned int t, m;
u32 state_mask;
- u64 now;
lockdep_assert_rq_held(cpu_rq(cpu));
groupc = per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu);
- /*
- * First we update the task counts according to the state
- * change requested through the @clear and @set bits.
- *
- * Then if the cgroup PSI stats accounting enabled, we
- * assess the aggregate resource states this CPU's tasks
- * have been in since the last change, and account any
- * SOME and FULL time these may have resulted in.
- */
- write_seqcount_begin(&groupc->seq);
- now = cpu_clock(cpu);
-
/*
* Start with TSK_ONCPU, which doesn't have a corresponding
* task count - it's just a boolean flag directly encoded in
@@ -843,7 +833,6 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
groupc->state_mask = state_mask;
- write_seqcount_end(&groupc->seq);
return;
}
@@ -864,8 +853,6 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
groupc->state_mask = state_mask;
- write_seqcount_end(&groupc->seq);
-
if (state_mask & group->rtpoll_states)
psi_schedule_rtpoll_work(group, 1, false);
@@ -901,6 +888,7 @@ void psi_task_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
{
int cpu = task_cpu(task);
struct psi_group *group;
+ u64 now;
if (!task->pid)
return;
@@ -908,16 +896,31 @@ void psi_task_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
psi_flags_change(task, clear, set);
group = task_psi_group(task);
- do {
- psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, true);
- } while ((group = group->parent));
+
+ for_each_group(tmp, group)
+ raw_write_seqcount_begin(&per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+
+ now = cpu_clock(cpu);
+
+ for_each_group(tmp, group) {
+ psi_group_change(tmp, cpu, clear, set, now, true);
+ raw_write_seqcount_end(&per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+ }
}
void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
bool sleep)
{
- struct psi_group *group, *common = NULL;
+ struct psi_group *prev_group = task_psi_group(prev);
+ struct psi_group *next_group = task_psi_group(next);
+ struct psi_group *common = NULL;
int cpu = task_cpu(prev);
+ u64 now;
+
+ if (prev->pid) {
+ for_each_group(tmp, prev_group)
+ raw_write_seqcount_begin(&per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+ }
if (next->pid) {
psi_flags_change(next, 0, TSK_ONCPU);
@@ -926,16 +929,27 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
* ancestors with @prev, those will already have @prev's
* TSK_ONCPU bit set, and we can stop the iteration there.
*/
- group = task_psi_group(next);
- do {
- if (per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu)->state_mask &
- PSI_ONCPU) {
- common = group;
+
+ for_each_group(tmp, next_group) {
+ struct psi_group_cpu *groupc = per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu);
+
+ if (groupc->state_mask & PSI_ONCPU) {
+ common = tmp;
break;
}
+ raw_write_seqcount_begin(&per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+ }
+ }
+
+ now = cpu_clock(cpu);
- psi_group_change(group, cpu, 0, TSK_ONCPU, true);
- } while ((group = group->parent));
+ if (next->pid) {
+ for_each_group(tmp, next_group) {
+ if (tmp == common)
+ break;
+ psi_group_change(tmp, cpu, 0, TSK_ONCPU, now, true);
+ raw_write_seqcount_end(&per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+ }
}
if (prev->pid) {
@@ -968,12 +982,12 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
psi_flags_change(prev, clear, set);
- group = task_psi_group(prev);
- do {
- if (group == common)
+ for_each_group(tmp, prev_group) {
+ if (tmp == common)
break;
- psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, wake_clock);
- } while ((group = group->parent));
+ psi_group_change(tmp, cpu, clear, set, now, wake_clock);
+ raw_write_seqcount_end(&per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+ }
/*
* TSK_ONCPU is handled up to the common ancestor. If there are
@@ -983,8 +997,10 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
*/
if ((prev->psi_flags ^ next->psi_flags) & ~TSK_ONCPU) {
clear &= ~TSK_ONCPU;
- for (; group; group = group->parent)
- psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, wake_clock);
+ for_each_group(tmp, common) {
+ psi_group_change(tmp, cpu, clear, set, now, wake_clock);
+ raw_write_seqcount_end(&per_cpu_ptr(tmp->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+ }
}
}
}
@@ -1221,12 +1237,14 @@ void psi_cgroup_restart(struct psi_group *group)
return;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- struct rq_flags rf;
+ u64 now;
- rq_lock_irq(rq, &rf);
- psi_group_change(group, cpu, 0, 0, true);
- rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf);
+ guard(rq_lock_irq)(cpu_rq(cpu));
+
+ raw_write_seqcount_begin(&per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
+ now = cpu_clock(cpu);
+ psi_group_change(group, cpu, 0, 0, now, true);
+ raw_write_seqcount_end(&per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu)->seq);
}
}
#endif /* CONFIG_CGROUPS */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-21 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-07 23:13 Chris Mason
2025-05-09 19:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-12 18:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-12 19:39 ` Chris Mason
2025-05-12 22:35 ` Chris Mason
2025-05-13 7:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-16 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 14:38 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-05-20 14:53 ` Chris Mason
2025-05-21 13:59 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-05-21 14:32 ` Chris Mason
2025-05-20 19:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-21 14:02 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-05-21 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-21 19:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-21 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-05-22 8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-22 15:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-05-23 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-23 12:27 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-07-10 12:46 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/psi: Optimize psi_group_change() cpu_clock() usage tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250521145447.GA31726@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®