From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/20] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for BHI
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 14:40:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250630124038.GFaGKFxtAiYEBUAFRy@fat_crate.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250509162839.3057217-15-david.kaplan@amd.com>
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 11:28:33AM -0500, David Kaplan wrote:
> There are two BHI mitigations, one for SYSCALL and one for VMEXIT.
> Split these up so they can be selected individually based on attack
> vector.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index 305a11fa9521..667385808400 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -1905,8 +1905,9 @@ static bool __init spec_ctrl_bhi_dis(void)
> enum bhi_mitigations {
> BHI_MITIGATION_OFF,
> BHI_MITIGATION_AUTO,
> - BHI_MITIGATION_ON,
> + BHI_MITIGATION_FULL,
> BHI_MITIGATION_VMEXIT_ONLY,
> + BHI_MITIGATION_SYSCALL_ONLY
We usually call those USER_KERNEL or so...
But I don't think you need it. The rename to _FULL is ok but the rest could
look like this:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index 32edf0b8a495..624d8d766dca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -2096,7 +2096,7 @@ static bool __init spec_ctrl_bhi_dis(void)
enum bhi_mitigations {
BHI_MITIGATION_OFF,
BHI_MITIGATION_AUTO,
- BHI_MITIGATION_ON,
+ BHI_MITIGATION_FULL,
BHI_MITIGATION_VMEXIT_ONLY,
};
@@ -2111,7 +2111,7 @@ static int __init spectre_bhi_parse_cmdline(char *str)
if (!strcmp(str, "off"))
bhi_mitigation = BHI_MITIGATION_OFF;
else if (!strcmp(str, "on"))
- bhi_mitigation = BHI_MITIGATION_ON;
+ bhi_mitigation = BHI_MITIGATION_FULL;
else if (!strcmp(str, "vmexit"))
bhi_mitigation = BHI_MITIGATION_VMEXIT_ONLY;
else
@@ -2123,11 +2123,11 @@ early_param("spectre_bhi", spectre_bhi_parse_cmdline);
static void __init bhi_select_mitigation(void)
{
- if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_BUG_BHI) || cpu_mitigations_off())
+ if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_BUG_BHI))
bhi_mitigation = BHI_MITIGATION_OFF;
if (bhi_mitigation == BHI_MITIGATION_AUTO)
- bhi_mitigation = BHI_MITIGATION_ON;
+ bhi_mitigation = BHI_MITIGATION_FULL;
}
static void __init bhi_update_mitigation(void)
@@ -2160,15 +2160,19 @@ static void __init bhi_apply_mitigation(void)
if (spec_ctrl_bhi_dis())
return;
- if (bhi_mitigation == BHI_MITIGATION_VMEXIT_ONLY) {
- pr_info("Spectre BHI mitigation: SW BHB clearing on VM exit only\n");
+ /* Mitigate KVM if guest->host protection is desired */
+ if (bhi_mitigation == BHI_MITIGATION_FULL ||
+ bhi_mitigation == BHI_MITIGATION_VMEXIT_ONLY) {
setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_VMEXIT);
- return;
+ pr_info("Spectre BHI mitigation: SW BHB clearing on VM exit\n");
}
- pr_info("Spectre BHI mitigation: SW BHB clearing on syscall and VM exit\n");
- setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP);
- setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_VMEXIT);
+ /* Mitigate syscalls if user->kernel protection is desired */
+ if (bhi_mitigation == BHI_MITIGATION_FULL ||
+ cpu_attack_vector_mitigated(CPU_MITIGATE_USER_KERNEL)) {
+ setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP);
+ pr_info("Spectre BHI mitigation: SW BHB clearing on syscall\n");
+ }
}
static void __init spectre_v2_select_mitigation(void)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-30 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 16:28 [PATCH v5 00/20] Attack vector controls (part 2) David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] Documentation/x86: Document new attack vector controls David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] cpu: Define attack vectors David Kaplan
2025-05-21 15:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] x86/Kconfig: Add arch attack vector support David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] x86/bugs: Define attack vectors relevant for each bug David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 05/20] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for MDS David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 06/20] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for TAA David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 07/20] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for MMIO David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 08/20] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for RFDS David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for SRBDS David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for GDS David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for spectre_v1 David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for retbleed David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for spectre_v2_user David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for BHI David Kaplan
2025-06-30 12:40 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2025-07-01 3:27 ` Kaplan, David
2025-07-01 11:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-07-02 18:24 ` Kaplan, David
2025-07-03 10:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for spectre_v2 David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for L1TF David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 17/20] x86/bugs: Add attack vector controls for SRSO David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] x86/pti: Add attack vector controls for PTI David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] x86/bugs: Print enabled attack vectors David Kaplan
2025-05-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v5 20/20] cpu: Show attack vectors in sysfs David Kaplan
2025-06-30 16:40 ` [PATCH v5 00/20] Attack vector controls (part 2) Borislav Petkov
2025-07-01 3:27 ` Kaplan, David
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250630124038.GFaGKFxtAiYEBUAFRy@fat_crate.local \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®