From: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Sohil Mehta" <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
"Brian Gerst" <brgerst@gmail.com>,
"Patryk Wlazlyn" <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/4] x86/smpboot: moves x86_topology to static initialize and truncate
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 18:57:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250710105715.66594-4-me@linux.beauty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250710105715.66594-1-me@linux.beauty>
From: Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
The #ifdeffery and the initializers in build_sched_topology() are just
disgusting.
Statically initialize the domain levels in the topology array and let
build_sched_topology() invalidate the package domain level when NUMA in
package is available.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 3d0f5737a157c..309338033356f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -478,32 +478,30 @@ static int x86_cluster_flags(void)
*/
static bool x86_has_numa_in_package;
-static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_topology[6];
-
-static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
-{
- int i = 0;
-
- x86_topology[i++] = SDTL_INIT(cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SMT);
+static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_topology[] = {
+ SDTL_INIT(cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SMT),
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER
- x86_topology[i++] = SDTL_INIT(cpu_clustergroup_mask, x86_cluster_flags, CLS);
+ SDTL_INIT(cpu_clustergroup_mask, x86_cluster_flags, CLS),
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
- x86_topology[i++] = SDTL_INIT(cpu_coregroup_mask, x86_core_flags, MC);
+ SDTL_INIT(cpu_coregroup_mask, x86_core_flags, MC),
#endif
- /*
- * When there is NUMA topology inside the package skip the PKG domain
- * since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the right spanning
- * domains based on the SLIT.
- */
- if (!x86_has_numa_in_package)
- x86_topology[i++] = SDTL_INIT(cpu_cpu_mask, x86_sched_itmt_flags, PKG);
+ SDTL_INIT(cpu_cpu_mask, x86_sched_itmt_flags, PKG),
+ { NULL },
+};
+static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
+{
/*
- * There must be one trailing NULL entry left.
+ * When there is NUMA topology inside the package invalidate the
+ * PKG domain since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the
+ * right spanning domains based on the SLIT.
*/
- BUG_ON(i >= ARRAY_SIZE(x86_topology) - 1);
+ if (x86_has_numa_in_package) {
+ unsigned int pkgdom = ARRAY_SIZE(x86_topology) - 2;
+ memset(&x86_topology[pkgdom], 0, sizeof(x86_topology[pkgdom]));
+ }
set_sched_topology(x86_topology);
}
--
2.50.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-10 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-10 10:57 [PATCH v5 0/4] x86/smpboot: tidy sched-topology and drop useless SMT level Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] smpboot: introduce SDTL_INIT() helper to tidy sched topology setup Li Chen
2025-07-11 5:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-11 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14 4:03 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-14 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-11 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/topology: Remove sched_domain_topology_level::flags tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-11 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] smpboot: introduce SDTL_INIT() helper to tidy sched topology setup Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] x86/smpboot: remove redundant CONFIG_SCHED_SMT Li Chen
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` Li Chen [this message]
2025-07-11 12:35 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] x86/smpboot: moves x86_topology to static initialize and truncate Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled Li Chen
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-11 5:52 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] x86/smpboot: tidy sched-topology and drop useless SMT level K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250710105715.66594-4-me@linux.beauty \
--to=me@linux.beauty \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®