From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] x86/smpboot: tidy sched-topology and drop useless SMT level
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 11:22:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <383084c1-370d-4cda-8d5d-01f7da827b50@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250710105715.66594-1-me@linux.beauty>
Hello Li,
On 7/10/2025 4:27 PM, Li Chen wrote:
> From: Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
>
> This series cleans up sched-domain topology handling and
> eliminates hundreds of pointless attach/destroy cycles for large
> machines when SMT is not available.
>
> Patch 1, 2, and 3 do some cleanup and refactor.
>
> Patch 4 is a follow-up that simply skip SMT domain when
> cpu_smt_num_threads <= 1, so the SMT level never gets created.
>
> Tested on Qemu.
Feel free to include:
Reviewed-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
I've given this series a spin again when looking at "tl->flags"
and everything runs as expected on x86 :)
> changelog:
> v2: fix wording issue as suggested by Thomas [1]
> v3: remove pointless memset and adjust PKG index accordingly, as
> suggested by Thomas [2], and refine some other wording issues.
> v4: v4: Split refactor patche into three parts (as suggested by Peter [3])
> and refined patch 4 logic (as done by K. [4]).
> v5: fix some style issues and do some improvements as pointed out by K. [5][6]
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/87msa2r018.ffs@tglx/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/875xglntx1.ffs@tglx/
> [3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/6/25/584
> [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1b706790-2fec-4582-a425-55eeff36c32e@amd.com/
> [5]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/f391491d-f886-4579-9b40-78a57f2ed1b5@amd.com/
> [6]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/7e7f686b-1f5a-46dc-8b16-c6d491160d1c@amd.com/
>
> Li Chen (4):
> smpboot: introduce SDTL() helper to tidy sched topology setup
> x86/smpboot: remove redundant CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> x86/smpboot: moves x86_topology to static initialize and truncate
> x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 34 +++++++++--------------
> arch/s390/kernel/topology.c | 10 +++----
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++------------------
> include/linux/sched/topology.h | 4 +--
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 24 ++++++----------
> 5 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-11 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-10 10:57 Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] smpboot: introduce SDTL_INIT() helper to tidy sched topology setup Li Chen
2025-07-11 5:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-11 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14 4:03 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-14 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-11 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/topology: Remove sched_domain_topology_level::flags tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-11 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] smpboot: introduce SDTL_INIT() helper to tidy sched topology setup Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] x86/smpboot: remove redundant CONFIG_SCHED_SMT Li Chen
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] x86/smpboot: moves x86_topology to static initialize and truncate Li Chen
2025-07-11 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled Li Chen
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-11 5:52 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=383084c1-370d-4cda-8d5d-01f7da827b50@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@linux.beauty \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®