From: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Sohil Mehta" <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
"Brian Gerst" <brgerst@gmail.com>,
"Patryk Wlazlyn" <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/4] x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 18:57:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250710105715.66594-5-me@linux.beauty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250710105715.66594-1-me@linux.beauty>
From: Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
Currently, the SMT domain is added into sched_domain_topology by default.
If cpu_attach_domain() finds that the CPU SMT domain’s cpumask_weight
is just 1, it will destroy it.
On a large machine, such as one with 512 cores, this results in
512 redundant domain attach/destroy operations.
Avoid these unnecessary operations by simply checking
cpu_smt_num_threads and skip SMT domain if the SMT domain is not
enabled.
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 309338033356f..33e166f6ab122 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -492,6 +492,8 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level x86_topology[] = {
static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
{
+ struct sched_domain_topology_level *topology = x86_topology;
+
/*
* When there is NUMA topology inside the package invalidate the
* PKG domain since the NUMA domains will auto-magically create the
@@ -502,7 +504,15 @@ static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
memset(&x86_topology[pkgdom], 0, sizeof(x86_topology[pkgdom]));
}
- set_sched_topology(x86_topology);
+
+ /*
+ * Drop the SMT domains if there is only one thread per-core
+ * since it'll get degenerated by the scheduler anyways.
+ */
+ if (cpu_smt_num_threads <= 1)
+ ++topology;
+
+ set_sched_topology(topology);
}
void set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
--
2.50.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-10 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-10 10:57 [PATCH v5 0/4] x86/smpboot: tidy sched-topology and drop useless SMT level Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] smpboot: introduce SDTL_INIT() helper to tidy sched topology setup Li Chen
2025-07-11 5:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-11 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14 4:03 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-14 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-11 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/topology: Remove sched_domain_topology_level::flags tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-11 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] smpboot: introduce SDTL_INIT() helper to tidy sched topology setup Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] x86/smpboot: remove redundant CONFIG_SCHED_SMT Li Chen
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] x86/smpboot: moves x86_topology to static initialize and truncate Li Chen
2025-07-11 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-10 10:57 ` Li Chen [this message]
2025-07-14 9:10 ` [tip: sched/core] x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled tip-bot2 for Li Chen
2025-07-11 5:52 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] x86/smpboot: tidy sched-topology and drop useless SMT level K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250710105715.66594-5-me@linux.beauty \
--to=me@linux.beauty \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®