From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Naveen rao <naveen.rao@amd.com>,
Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@amd.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] x86/cpu/topology: Check for X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY instead of passing has_topoext
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 06:04:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250818060435.2452-5-kprateek.nayak@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250818060435.2452-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
cpu_parse_topology_ext() sets X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY before returning
true if any of the XTOPOLOGY leaf could be parsed successfully.
Instead of storing and passing around this return value using
"has_topoext" in parse_topology_amd(), check for X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY
instead in parse_8000_001e() to simplify the flow.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
---
Changelog v2..v3:
o Use cpu_feature_enabled() when checking for X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY.
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c
index 3d01675d94f5..138a09528083 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static void store_node(struct topo_scan *tscan, u16 nr_nodes, u16 node_id)
tscan->amd_node_id = node_id;
}
-static bool parse_8000_001e(struct topo_scan *tscan, bool has_topoext)
+static bool parse_8000_001e(struct topo_scan *tscan)
{
struct {
// eax
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static bool parse_8000_001e(struct topo_scan *tscan, bool has_topoext)
cpuid_leaf(0x8000001e, &leaf);
- if (!has_topoext) {
+ if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY)) {
/*
* Prefer initial_apicid parsed from XTOPOLOGY leaf
* 0x8000026 or 0xb if available. Otherwise prefer the
@@ -179,6 +179,9 @@ static void topoext_fixup(struct topo_scan *tscan)
static void parse_topology_amd(struct topo_scan *tscan)
{
+ if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_AMD_HTR_CORES))
+ tscan->c->topo.cpu_type = cpuid_ebx(0x80000026);
+
/*
* Try to get SMT, CORE, TILE, and DIE shifts from extended
* CPUID leaf 0x8000_0026 on supported processors first. If
@@ -186,16 +189,11 @@ static void parse_topology_amd(struct topo_scan *tscan)
* get SMT and CORE shift from leaf 0xb first, then try to
* get the CORE shift from leaf 0x8000_0008.
*/
- bool has_topoext = cpu_parse_topology_ext(tscan);
-
- if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_AMD_HTR_CORES))
- tscan->c->topo.cpu_type = cpuid_ebx(0x80000026);
-
- if (!has_topoext && !parse_8000_0008(tscan))
+ if (!cpu_parse_topology_ext(tscan) && !parse_8000_0008(tscan))
return;
/* Prefer leaf 0x8000001e if available */
- if (parse_8000_001e(tscan, has_topoext))
+ if (parse_8000_001e(tscan))
return;
/* Try the NODEID MSR */
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-18 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-18 6:04 [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/cpu/topology: Work around the nuances of virtualization on AMD/Hygon K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-18 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/msr-index: Define AMD64_CPUID_FN_EXT MSR K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-18 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/cpu/topology: Use initial APICID from XTOPOEXT on AMD/HYGON K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-18 6:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/cpu/topology: Always try cpu_parse_topology_ext() on AMD/Hygon K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-18 6:04 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2025-08-24 13:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] x86/cpu/topology: Check for X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY instead of passing has_topoext Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-24 14:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-25 4:05 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-19 11:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/cpu/topology: Work around the nuances of virtualization on AMD/Hygon Borislav Petkov
2025-08-19 14:28 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-19 21:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-20 8:11 ` Naveen N Rao
2025-08-20 8:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-20 9:12 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-20 9:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-20 9:59 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250818060435.2452-5-kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=naveen.rao@amd.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sarunkod@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®