mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@amd.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/cpu/topology: Work around the nuances of virtualization on AMD/Hygon
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 15:29:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKWcaPyal4mDfy3J@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97aace4c-921f-4037-b8f2-c4112b4a26a9@amd.com>

On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 02:42:26PM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Boris,
> 
> On 8/20/2025 2:29 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 01:41:28PM +0530, Naveen N Rao wrote:
> >> That suggests use of leaf 0xb for the initial x2APIC ID especially 
> >> during early init.  I'm not sure why leaf 0x8000001e was preferred over 
> >> leaf 0xb in commit c749ce393b8f ("x86/cpu: Use common topology code for 
> >> AMD") though.
> > 
> > Well, I see parse_topology_amd() calling cpu_parse_topology_ext() if you have
> > TOPOEXT - which all AMD hw does - which then does cpu_parse_topology_ext() and
> > that one tries 0x80000026 and then falls back to 0xb and *only* *then* to
> > 0x8000001e.
> > 
> > So, it looks like it DTRT to me...
> 
> But parse_8000_001e() then unconditionally overwrites the
> "initial_apicid" with the value in 0x8000001E EAX despite it being
> populated from cpu_parse_topology_ext().
> 
> The flow is as follows:
> 
>   parse_topology_amd()
>     if (X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT) /* True */
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>	cpu_parse_topology_ext();

Patch 2 from this patchset, which removes this "if" condition above
seems to be the right thing to do.

X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT refers to CPUID 0x80000001.ECX[22] which advertises the support for 0x8000001D.EAX
and 0x8000001E.EAX.

OTOH, the function cpu_parse_topology_ext() parses the topology via the following CPUIDs in that order

* CPUID 0x1f (Intel Only)
* CPUID 0x80000026 (AMD only)
* CPUID 0xB (Both Intel and AMD)

None of these have anything to do with X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT.

So the call to cpu_parse_topology_ext() in parse_topology_amd()
doesn't have to be gated by the presence or absence of
X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT.

I agree that QEMU needs to sort out what needs to do something better
than clearing all the regs of CPUID 0x8000001E on encountering a
topology with more than 256 cores.

Or at the very least not clear the CPUID 0x8000001E.EAX which has the
provision to advertise a valid Extended APIC ID.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
gautham.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-20  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-18  6:04 K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-18  6:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/msr-index: Define AMD64_CPUID_FN_EXT MSR K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-18  6:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/cpu/topology: Use initial APICID from XTOPOEXT on AMD/HYGON K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-18  6:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/cpu/topology: Always try cpu_parse_topology_ext() on AMD/Hygon K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-18  6:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] x86/cpu/topology: Check for X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY instead of passing has_topoext K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-24 13:38   ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-24 14:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-25  4:05       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-19 11:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/cpu/topology: Work around the nuances of virtualization on AMD/Hygon Borislav Petkov
2025-08-19 14:28   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-19 21:24     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-20  8:11   ` Naveen N Rao
2025-08-20  8:59     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-20  9:12       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-20  9:28         ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-20  9:59         ` Gautham R. Shenoy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aKWcaPyal4mDfy3J@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com \
    --to=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sarunkod@amd.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®