mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
To: <dave@stgolabs.net>, <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
	<dave.jiang@intel.com>, <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	<dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	<shiju.jose@huawei.com>, <ming.li@zohomail.com>,
	<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>, <rrichter@amd.com>,
	<dan.carpenter@linaro.org>, <PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com>,
	<lukas@wunner.de>, <Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com>,
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <alucerop@amd.com>,
	<ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v11 05/23] cxl: Move CXL driver RCH error handling into CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS conditional block
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 20:35:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250827013539.903682-6-terry.bowman@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250827013539.903682-1-terry.bowman@amd.com>

Restricted CXL Host (RCH) protocol error handling uses a procedure distinct
from the CXL Virtual Hierarchy (VH) handling. This is because of the
differences in the RCH and VH topologies. Improve the maintainability and
add ability to enable/disable RCH handling.

Move and combine the RCH handling code into a single block conditionally
compiled with the CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS kernel config.

Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>

---
v10->v11:
- New patch
---
 drivers/cxl/core/ras.c | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
index 0875ce8116ff..f42f9a255ef8 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ void cxl_ras_exit(void)
 	cancel_work_sync(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS
 static void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport)
 {
 	resource_size_t aer_phys;
@@ -141,18 +142,6 @@ static void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport)
 	}
 }
 
-static void cxl_dport_map_ras(struct cxl_dport *dport)
-{
-	struct cxl_register_map *map = &dport->reg_map;
-	struct device *dev = dport->dport_dev;
-
-	if (!map->component_map.ras.valid)
-		dev_dbg(dev, "RAS registers not found\n");
-	else if (cxl_map_component_regs(map, &dport->regs.component,
-					BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)))
-		dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
-}
-
 static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
 {
 	void __iomem *aer_base = dport->regs.dport_aer;
@@ -177,6 +166,95 @@ static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
 	writel(aer_cmd, aer_base + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Copy the AER capability registers using 32 bit read accesses.
+ * This is necessary because RCRB AER capability is MMIO mapped. Clear the
+ * status after copying.
+ *
+ * @aer_base: base address of AER capability block in RCRB
+ * @aer_regs: destination for copying AER capability
+ */
+static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_info(void __iomem *aer_base,
+				 struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs)
+{
+	int read_cnt = sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs) / sizeof(u32);
+	u32 *aer_regs_buf = (u32 *)aer_regs;
+	int n;
+
+	if (!aer_base)
+		return false;
+
+	/* Use readl() to guarantee 32-bit accesses */
+	for (n = 0; n < read_cnt; n++)
+		aer_regs_buf[n] = readl(aer_base + n * sizeof(u32));
+
+	writel(aer_regs->uncor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS);
+	writel(aer_regs->cor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+/* Get AER severity. Return false if there is no error. */
+static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs,
+				     int *severity)
+{
+	if (aer_regs->uncor_status & ~aer_regs->uncor_mask) {
+		if (aer_regs->uncor_status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
+			*severity = AER_FATAL;
+		else
+			*severity = AER_NONFATAL;
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	if (aer_regs->cor_status & ~aer_regs->cor_mask) {
+		*severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(cxlds->dev);
+	struct aer_capability_regs aer_regs;
+	struct cxl_dport *dport;
+	int severity;
+
+	struct cxl_port *port __free(put_cxl_port) =
+		cxl_pci_find_port(pdev, &dport);
+	if (!port)
+		return;
+
+	if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_info(dport->regs.dport_aer, &aer_regs))
+		return;
+
+	if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(&aer_regs, &severity))
+		return;
+
+	pci_print_aer(pdev, severity, &aer_regs);
+	if (severity == AER_CORRECTABLE)
+		cxl_handle_cor_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
+	else
+		cxl_handle_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
+}
+#else
+static inline void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport) { }
+static inline void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport) { }
+static inline void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds) { }
+#endif
+
+static void cxl_dport_map_ras(struct cxl_dport *dport)
+{
+	struct cxl_register_map *map = &dport->reg_map;
+	struct device *dev = dport->dport_dev;
+
+	if (!map->component_map.ras.valid)
+		dev_dbg(dev, "RAS registers not found\n");
+	else if (cxl_map_component_regs(map, &dport->regs.component,
+					BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)))
+		dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
+}
 
 /**
  * cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting - Setup CXL RAS report on this dport
@@ -270,79 +348,6 @@ static bool cxl_handle_ras(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, void __iomem *ras_base)
 	return true;
 }
 
-/*
- * Copy the AER capability registers using 32 bit read accesses.
- * This is necessary because RCRB AER capability is MMIO mapped. Clear the
- * status after copying.
- *
- * @aer_base: base address of AER capability block in RCRB
- * @aer_regs: destination for copying AER capability
- */
-static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_info(void __iomem *aer_base,
-				 struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs)
-{
-	int read_cnt = sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs) / sizeof(u32);
-	u32 *aer_regs_buf = (u32 *)aer_regs;
-	int n;
-
-	if (!aer_base)
-		return false;
-
-	/* Use readl() to guarantee 32-bit accesses */
-	for (n = 0; n < read_cnt; n++)
-		aer_regs_buf[n] = readl(aer_base + n * sizeof(u32));
-
-	writel(aer_regs->uncor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS);
-	writel(aer_regs->cor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS);
-
-	return true;
-}
-
-/* Get AER severity. Return false if there is no error. */
-static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs,
-				     int *severity)
-{
-	if (aer_regs->uncor_status & ~aer_regs->uncor_mask) {
-		if (aer_regs->uncor_status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
-			*severity = AER_FATAL;
-		else
-			*severity = AER_NONFATAL;
-		return true;
-	}
-
-	if (aer_regs->cor_status & ~aer_regs->cor_mask) {
-		*severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
-		return true;
-	}
-
-	return false;
-}
-
-static void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
-{
-	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(cxlds->dev);
-	struct aer_capability_regs aer_regs;
-	struct cxl_dport *dport;
-	int severity;
-
-	struct cxl_port *port __free(put_cxl_port) =
-		cxl_pci_find_port(pdev, &dport);
-	if (!port)
-		return;
-
-	if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_info(dport->regs.dport_aer, &aer_regs))
-		return;
-
-	if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(&aer_regs, &severity))
-		return;
-
-	pci_print_aer(pdev, severity, &aer_regs);
-	if (severity == AER_CORRECTABLE)
-		cxl_handle_cor_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
-	else
-		cxl_handle_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
-}
-
 void cxl_cor_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
 	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
-- 
2.51.0.rc2.21.ge5ab6b3e5a


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-27  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-27  1:35 [PATCH v11 00/23] Enable CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling and logging Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 01/23] cxl: Remove ifdef blocks of CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL from core/pci.c Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 02/23] CXL/AER: Remove CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL and replace with CONFIG_CXL_RAS Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 15:24   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-29 18:16   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 03/23] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL Endpoint handling helper functions Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 15:28   ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 04/23] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL RCH " Terry Bowman
2025-08-28  8:35   ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-08-28 17:32   ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27  1:35 ` Terry Bowman [this message]
2025-08-28  8:57   ` [PATCH v11 05/23] cxl: Move CXL driver RCH error handling into CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS conditional block Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-09-10 16:43     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-29 15:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11 17:48     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:41       ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-15 13:32         ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 06/23] CXL/AER: Introduce rch_aer.c into AER driver for handling CXL RCH errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 20:53   ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-29  8:39     ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 17:01       ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 17:26         ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-12 13:59       ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-12 19:09         ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 16:56     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 12:43   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 07/23] CXL/PCI: Move CXL DVSEC definitions into uapi/linux/pci_regs.h Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 14:51   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-29 15:42     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-29 15:47     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-28 21:07   ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 18:11     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 20:06       ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 08/23] PCI/CXL: Introduce pcie_is_cxl() Terry Bowman
2025-08-28  8:18   ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-09-10 16:24     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11  3:48       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 13:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 09/23] PCI/AER: Report CXL or PCIe bus error type in trace logging Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  7:37   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 15:26     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 15:33       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-11  5:07   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 10/23] CXL/AER: Update PCI class code check to use FIELD_GET() Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 16:03   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11 18:18     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 11/23] cxl/pci: Update RAS handler interfaces to also support CXL Ports Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 12/23] cxl/pci: Log message if RAS registers are unmapped Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 13/23] cxl/pci: Unify CXL trace logging for CXL Endpoints and CXL Ports Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 11:55   ` Shiju Jose
2025-08-29 16:06     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 14/23] cxl/pci: Update cxl_handle_cor_ras() to return early if no RAS errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 15/23] cxl/pci: Map CXL Endpoint Port and CXL Switch Port RAS registers Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 23:05   ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 18:40     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 16/23] cxl/pci: Introduce CXL Endpoint protocol error handlers Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  7:48   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 13:23   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 17/23] CXL/AER: Introduce cxl_aer.c into AER driver for forwarding CXL errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  7:56   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 18/23] PCI/AER: Dequeue forwarded CXL error Terry Bowman
2025-08-29  0:43   ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-29  7:10     ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-16 15:18       ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 14:33     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 15:41       ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-11 16:47         ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:45           ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 13:29   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 19/23] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL Port protocol error handlers Terry Bowman
2025-08-30  0:17   ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 20/23] CXL/PCI: Export and rename merge_result() to pci_ers_merge_result() Terry Bowman
2025-08-27  8:04   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 15:57     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11  3:44       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27 12:19   ` kernel test robot
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 21/23] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL uncorrectable protocol error recovery Terry Bowman
2025-09-03 22:30   ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-11 19:19     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:48       ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 13:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 22/23] CXL/PCI: Enable CXL protocol errors during CXL Port probe Terry Bowman
2025-09-03 23:23   ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27  1:35 ` [PATCH v11 23/23] CXL/PCI: Disable CXL protocol error interrupts during CXL Port cleanup Terry Bowman
2025-09-10 15:07   ` Gregory Price
2025-09-11 20:19     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-29  0:07 ` [PATCH v11 00/23] Enable CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling and logging Dave Jiang
2025-09-23  3:29 ` Gregory Price
2025-09-23  9:21   ` Srinivasulu Thanneeru

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250827013539.903682-6-terry.bowman@amd.com \
    --to=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    --cc=Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com \
    --cc=PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=alucerop@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
    --cc=rrichter@amd.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®