From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Cc: <dave@stgolabs.net>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <shiju.jose@huawei.com>,
<ming.li@zohomail.com>, <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
<rrichter@amd.com>, <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
<PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com>, <lukas@wunner.de>,
<Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com>,
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <alucerop@amd.com>,
<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 05/23] cxl: Move CXL driver RCH error handling into CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS conditional block
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 16:33:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250829163355.00004fda@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250827013539.903682-6-terry.bowman@amd.com>
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 20:35:20 -0500
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com> wrote:
> Restricted CXL Host (RCH) protocol error handling uses a procedure distinct
> from the CXL Virtual Hierarchy (VH) handling. This is because of the
> differences in the RCH and VH topologies. Improve the maintainability and
> add ability to enable/disable RCH handling.
>
> Move and combine the RCH handling code into a single block conditionally
> compiled with the CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS kernel config.
>
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
>
How painful to move this to a ras_rch.c file and conditionally compile that?
Would want to do that is some merged thing with patch 1 though, rather than
moving at least some of the code twice.
> ---
> v10->v11:
> - New patch
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/ras.c | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> index 0875ce8116ff..f42f9a255ef8 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ void cxl_ras_exit(void)
> cancel_work_sync(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS
> static void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport)
> {
> resource_size_t aer_phys;
> @@ -141,18 +142,6 @@ static void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport)
> }
> }
>
> -static void cxl_dport_map_ras(struct cxl_dport *dport)
> -{
> - struct cxl_register_map *map = &dport->reg_map;
> - struct device *dev = dport->dport_dev;
> -
> - if (!map->component_map.ras.valid)
> - dev_dbg(dev, "RAS registers not found\n");
> - else if (cxl_map_component_regs(map, &dport->regs.component,
> - BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)))
> - dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
> -}
> -
> static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
> {
> void __iomem *aer_base = dport->regs.dport_aer;
> @@ -177,6 +166,95 @@ static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
> writel(aer_cmd, aer_base + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Copy the AER capability registers using 32 bit read accesses.
> + * This is necessary because RCRB AER capability is MMIO mapped. Clear the
> + * status after copying.
> + *
> + * @aer_base: base address of AER capability block in RCRB
> + * @aer_regs: destination for copying AER capability
> + */
> +static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_info(void __iomem *aer_base,
> + struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs)
> +{
> + int read_cnt = sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs) / sizeof(u32);
> + u32 *aer_regs_buf = (u32 *)aer_regs;
> + int n;
> +
> + if (!aer_base)
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Use readl() to guarantee 32-bit accesses */
> + for (n = 0; n < read_cnt; n++)
> + aer_regs_buf[n] = readl(aer_base + n * sizeof(u32));
> +
> + writel(aer_regs->uncor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS);
> + writel(aer_regs->cor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/* Get AER severity. Return false if there is no error. */
> +static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs,
> + int *severity)
> +{
> + if (aer_regs->uncor_status & ~aer_regs->uncor_mask) {
> + if (aer_regs->uncor_status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
> + *severity = AER_FATAL;
> + else
> + *severity = AER_NONFATAL;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + if (aer_regs->cor_status & ~aer_regs->cor_mask) {
> + *severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(cxlds->dev);
> + struct aer_capability_regs aer_regs;
> + struct cxl_dport *dport;
> + int severity;
> +
> + struct cxl_port *port __free(put_cxl_port) =
> + cxl_pci_find_port(pdev, &dport);
> + if (!port)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_info(dport->regs.dport_aer, &aer_regs))
> + return;
> +
> + if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(&aer_regs, &severity))
> + return;
> +
> + pci_print_aer(pdev, severity, &aer_regs);
> + if (severity == AER_CORRECTABLE)
> + cxl_handle_cor_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
> + else
> + cxl_handle_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport) { }
> +static inline void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport) { }
> +static inline void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds) { }
> +#endif
> +
> +static void cxl_dport_map_ras(struct cxl_dport *dport)
> +{
> + struct cxl_register_map *map = &dport->reg_map;
> + struct device *dev = dport->dport_dev;
> +
> + if (!map->component_map.ras.valid)
> + dev_dbg(dev, "RAS registers not found\n");
> + else if (cxl_map_component_regs(map, &dport->regs.component,
> + BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)))
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
> +}
>
> /**
> * cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting - Setup CXL RAS report on this dport
> @@ -270,79 +348,6 @@ static bool cxl_handle_ras(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, void __iomem *ras_base)
> return true;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Copy the AER capability registers using 32 bit read accesses.
> - * This is necessary because RCRB AER capability is MMIO mapped. Clear the
> - * status after copying.
> - *
> - * @aer_base: base address of AER capability block in RCRB
> - * @aer_regs: destination for copying AER capability
> - */
> -static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_info(void __iomem *aer_base,
> - struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs)
> -{
> - int read_cnt = sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs) / sizeof(u32);
> - u32 *aer_regs_buf = (u32 *)aer_regs;
> - int n;
> -
> - if (!aer_base)
> - return false;
> -
> - /* Use readl() to guarantee 32-bit accesses */
> - for (n = 0; n < read_cnt; n++)
> - aer_regs_buf[n] = readl(aer_base + n * sizeof(u32));
> -
> - writel(aer_regs->uncor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS);
> - writel(aer_regs->cor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS);
> -
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> -/* Get AER severity. Return false if there is no error. */
> -static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs,
> - int *severity)
> -{
> - if (aer_regs->uncor_status & ~aer_regs->uncor_mask) {
> - if (aer_regs->uncor_status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
> - *severity = AER_FATAL;
> - else
> - *severity = AER_NONFATAL;
> - return true;
> - }
> -
> - if (aer_regs->cor_status & ~aer_regs->cor_mask) {
> - *severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
> - return true;
> - }
> -
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> -static void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
> -{
> - struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(cxlds->dev);
> - struct aer_capability_regs aer_regs;
> - struct cxl_dport *dport;
> - int severity;
> -
> - struct cxl_port *port __free(put_cxl_port) =
> - cxl_pci_find_port(pdev, &dport);
> - if (!port)
> - return;
> -
> - if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_info(dport->regs.dport_aer, &aer_regs))
> - return;
> -
> - if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(&aer_regs, &severity))
> - return;
> -
> - pci_print_aer(pdev, severity, &aer_regs);
> - if (severity == AER_CORRECTABLE)
> - cxl_handle_cor_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
> - else
> - cxl_handle_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
> -}
> -
> void cxl_cor_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-29 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-27 1:35 [PATCH v11 00/23] Enable CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling and logging Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 01/23] cxl: Remove ifdef blocks of CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL from core/pci.c Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 02/23] CXL/AER: Remove CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL and replace with CONFIG_CXL_RAS Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 15:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-29 18:16 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 03/23] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL Endpoint handling helper functions Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 15:28 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 04/23] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL RCH " Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 8:35 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-08-28 17:32 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 05/23] cxl: Move CXL driver RCH error handling into CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS conditional block Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 8:57 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-09-10 16:43 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-29 15:33 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-09-11 17:48 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:41 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-15 13:32 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 06/23] CXL/AER: Introduce rch_aer.c into AER driver for handling CXL RCH errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 20:53 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-29 8:39 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 17:01 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 17:26 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-12 13:59 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-12 19:09 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 16:56 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 12:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 07/23] CXL/PCI: Move CXL DVSEC definitions into uapi/linux/pci_regs.h Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 14:51 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-29 15:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-29 15:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-28 21:07 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 18:11 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 20:06 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 08/23] PCI/CXL: Introduce pcie_is_cxl() Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 8:18 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-09-10 16:24 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 3:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 13:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 09/23] PCI/AER: Report CXL or PCIe bus error type in trace logging Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 7:37 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 15:26 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 15:33 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-11 5:07 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 10/23] CXL/AER: Update PCI class code check to use FIELD_GET() Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 16:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11 18:18 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 11/23] cxl/pci: Update RAS handler interfaces to also support CXL Ports Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 12/23] cxl/pci: Log message if RAS registers are unmapped Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 13/23] cxl/pci: Unify CXL trace logging for CXL Endpoints and CXL Ports Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 11:55 ` Shiju Jose
2025-08-29 16:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 14/23] cxl/pci: Update cxl_handle_cor_ras() to return early if no RAS errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 15/23] cxl/pci: Map CXL Endpoint Port and CXL Switch Port RAS registers Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 23:05 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 18:40 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 16/23] cxl/pci: Introduce CXL Endpoint protocol error handlers Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 7:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 13:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 17/23] CXL/AER: Introduce cxl_aer.c into AER driver for forwarding CXL errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 7:56 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 18/23] PCI/AER: Dequeue forwarded CXL error Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 0:43 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-29 7:10 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-16 15:18 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 14:33 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 15:41 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-11 16:47 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:45 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 13:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 19/23] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL Port protocol error handlers Terry Bowman
2025-08-30 0:17 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 20/23] CXL/PCI: Export and rename merge_result() to pci_ers_merge_result() Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 8:04 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 15:57 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 3:44 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27 12:19 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 21/23] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL uncorrectable protocol error recovery Terry Bowman
2025-09-03 22:30 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-11 19:19 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:48 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 13:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 22/23] CXL/PCI: Enable CXL protocol errors during CXL Port probe Terry Bowman
2025-09-03 23:23 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 23/23] CXL/PCI: Disable CXL protocol error interrupts during CXL Port cleanup Terry Bowman
2025-09-10 15:07 ` Gregory Price
2025-09-11 20:19 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-29 0:07 ` [PATCH v11 00/23] Enable CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling and logging Dave Jiang
2025-09-23 3:29 ` Gregory Price
2025-09-23 9:21 ` Srinivasulu Thanneeru
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250829163355.00004fda@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com \
--cc=PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com \
--cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=alucerop@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®