From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 15/19] sched/fair: Introduce sched_asym_prefer_idle() for ILB kick
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 04:15:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250904041516.3046-16-kprateek.nayak@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250904041516.3046-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
nohz_balancer_kick() currently depends on "nohz.idle_cpus_maks" to kick
off an idle balance if it finds a more preferred CPU in nohz idle state.
Move the detection logic into sched_asym_prefer_idle() and use the
distributed "sd->shared" based nohz tracking to kick ILB if a more
preferred CPU is found idle.
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 5e7198078d19..d309cb73d428 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -12289,6 +12289,56 @@ static inline int find_new_ilb(void)
return -1;
}
+static inline int
+__asym_prefer_idle(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd_asym, struct cpumask *idle_mask)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for_each_cpu_and(i, idle_mask, sched_domain_span(sd_asym)) {
+ if (sched_asym(sd_asym, i, cpu))
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int sched_asym_prefer_idle(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd_asym)
+{
+ struct sched_domain *sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_nohz, cpu));
+ struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
+
+ if (!sd)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * If sd_asym_packing is a subset of sd_llc, don't traverse
+ * the nohz_shared_list and directly use the mask from
+ * sd_nohz->shared to find it a preferred CPU is idling.
+ */
+ if (sd_asym->flags & SD_SHARE_LLC) {
+ sds = sd->shared;
+
+ if (sds &&
+ atomic_read(&sds->nr_idle_cpus) &&
+ __asym_prefer_idle(cpu, sd_asym, sds->idle_cpus_mask))
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Try the entire list id sd_asym_packing is larger than sd_nohz. */
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(sds, &nohz_shared_list, nohz_list_node) {
+ /* No idle CPUs in this domain */
+ if (!atomic_read(&sds->nr_idle_cpus))
+ continue;
+
+ if (__asym_prefer_idle(cpu, sd_asym, sds->idle_cpus_mask))
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Kick a CPU to do the NOHZ balancing, if it is time for it, via a cross-CPU
* SMP function call (IPI).
@@ -12343,7 +12393,7 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
unsigned long now = jiffies;
struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
struct sched_domain *sd;
- int nr_busy, i, cpu = rq->cpu;
+ int nr_busy, cpu = rq->cpu;
unsigned int flags = 0;
if (unlikely(rq->idle_balance))
@@ -12389,21 +12439,9 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
}
sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_packing, cpu));
- if (sd) {
- /*
- * When ASYM_PACKING; see if there's a more preferred CPU
- * currently idle; in which case, kick the ILB to move tasks
- * around.
- *
- * When balancing between cores, all the SMT siblings of the
- * preferred CPU must be idle.
- */
- for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
- if (sched_asym(sd, i, cpu)) {
- flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
- goto unlock;
- }
- }
+ if (sd && sched_asym_prefer_idle(cpu, sd)) {
+ flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
+ goto unlock;
}
sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_cpucapacity, cpu));
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-04 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-04 4:14 [RFC PATCH 00/19] sched/fair: Distributed nohz idle CPU tracking for idle load balancing K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:14 ` [RFC PATCH 01/19] sched/fair: Simplify set_cpu_sd_state_*() with guards K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-24 20:26 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-25 2:11 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:14 ` [RFC PATCH 02/19] sched/topology: Optimize sd->shared allocation and assignment K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:14 ` [RFC PATCH 03/19] sched/fair: Use rq->nohz_tick_stopped in update_nohz_stats() K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-24 20:17 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-25 1:48 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 04/19] sched/fair: Use xchg() to set sd->nohz_idle state K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 05/19] sched/topology: Attach new hierarchy in rq_attach_root() K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 06/19] sched/fair: Fixup sd->nohz_idle state during hotplug / cpuset K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 07/19] sched/fair: Account idle cpus instead of busy cpus in sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 08/19] sched/topology: Introduce fallback sd->shared assignment K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 09/19] sched/topology: Introduce percpu sd_nohz for nohz state tracking K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 10/19] sched/topology: Introduce "idle_cpus_mask" in sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 11/19] sched/topology: Introduce "nohz_shared_list" to keep track of sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 12/19] sched/fair: Reorder the barrier in nohz_balance_enter_idle() K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 13/19] sched/fair: Extract the main _nohz_idle_balance() loop into a helper K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 14/19] sched/fair: Convert find_new_ilb() to use nohz_shared_list K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 16/19] sched/fair: Convert sched_balance_nohz_idle() " K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 17/19] sched/fair: Remove "nohz.idle_cpus_mask" K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 18/19] sched/fair: Optimize global "nohz.nr_cpus" tracking K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-24 20:02 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-25 2:37 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 19/19] sched/topology: Add basic debug information for "nohz_shared_list" K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250904041516.3046-16-kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®