From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 17/19] sched/fair: Remove "nohz.idle_cpus_mask"
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 04:15:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250904041516.3046-18-kprateek.nayak@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250904041516.3046-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
All users of "nohz.idle_cpus_mask" have been converted to use the
distributed nohz idle tracking using "nohz_shared_list". Get rid of the
centralized "nohz.idle_cpus_mask" based tracking.
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index c7ac8e7094ed..5b693bd0fab4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7169,7 +7169,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, should_we_balance_tmpmask);
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
static struct {
- cpumask_var_t idle_cpus_mask;
atomic_t nr_cpus;
int has_blocked; /* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
int needs_update; /* Newly idle CPUs need their next_balance collated */
@@ -12517,7 +12516,6 @@ void nohz_balance_exit_idle(struct rq *rq)
return;
WRITE_ONCE(rq->nohz_tick_stopped, 0);
- cpumask_clear_cpu(rq->cpu, nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
atomic_dec(&nohz.nr_cpus);
set_cpu_sd_state_busy(rq->cpu);
@@ -12576,8 +12574,9 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
/*
* The tick is still stopped but load could have been added in the
* meantime. We set the nohz.has_blocked flag to trig a check of the
- * *_avg. The CPU is already part of nohz.idle_cpus_mask so the clear
- * of nohz.has_blocked can only happen after checking the new load
+ * *_avg. The CPU is already part of sd_nohz->idle_cpus_mask so the
+ * clear of nohz.has_blocked can only happen after checking the new
+ * load
*/
if (READ_ONCE(rq->nohz_tick_stopped))
goto out;
@@ -12588,7 +12587,6 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
WRITE_ONCE(rq->nohz_tick_stopped, 1);
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
atomic_inc(&nohz.nr_cpus);
set_cpu_sd_state_idle(cpu);
@@ -12832,15 +12830,15 @@ static bool nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
* entering idle state. Here we run ILB directly without issuing IPIs.
*
* Note that when this function is called, the tick may not yet be stopped on
- * this CPU yet. nohz.idle_cpus_mask is updated only when tick is stopped and
- * cleared on the next busy tick. In other words, nohz.idle_cpus_mask updates
- * don't align with CPUs enter/exit idle to avoid bottlenecks due to high idle
- * entry/exit rate (usec). So it is possible that _nohz_idle_balance() is
- * called from this function on (this) CPU that's not yet in the mask. That's
- * OK because the goal of nohz_run_idle_balance() is to run ILB only for
- * updating the blocked load of already idle CPUs without waking up one of
- * those idle CPUs and outside the preempt disable / IRQ off phase of the local
- * cpu about to enter idle, because it can take a long time.
+ * this CPU yet. sd_nohz->idle_cpus_mask is updated only when tick is stopped
+ * and cleared on the next busy tick. In other words, sd_nohz->idle_cpus_mask
+ * updates don't align with CPUs enter/exit idle to avoid bottlenecks due to
+ * high idle entry/exit rate (usec). So it is possible that
+ * _nohz_idle_balance() is called from this function on (this) CPU that's not
+ * yet in the mask. That's OK because the goal of nohz_run_idle_balance() is to
+ * run ILB only for updating the blocked load of already idle CPUs without
+ * waking up one of those idle CPUs and outside the preempt disable / IRQ off
+ * phase of the local cpu about to enter idle, because it can take a long time.
*/
void nohz_run_idle_balance(int cpu)
{
@@ -13841,6 +13839,5 @@ __init void init_sched_fair_class(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
nohz.next_balance = jiffies;
nohz.next_blocked = jiffies;
- zalloc_cpumask_var(&nohz.idle_cpus_mask, GFP_NOWAIT);
#endif
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-04 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-04 4:14 [RFC PATCH 00/19] sched/fair: Distributed nohz idle CPU tracking for idle load balancing K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:14 ` [RFC PATCH 01/19] sched/fair: Simplify set_cpu_sd_state_*() with guards K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-24 20:26 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-25 2:11 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:14 ` [RFC PATCH 02/19] sched/topology: Optimize sd->shared allocation and assignment K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:14 ` [RFC PATCH 03/19] sched/fair: Use rq->nohz_tick_stopped in update_nohz_stats() K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-24 20:17 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-25 1:48 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 04/19] sched/fair: Use xchg() to set sd->nohz_idle state K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 05/19] sched/topology: Attach new hierarchy in rq_attach_root() K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 06/19] sched/fair: Fixup sd->nohz_idle state during hotplug / cpuset K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 07/19] sched/fair: Account idle cpus instead of busy cpus in sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 08/19] sched/topology: Introduce fallback sd->shared assignment K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 09/19] sched/topology: Introduce percpu sd_nohz for nohz state tracking K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 10/19] sched/topology: Introduce "idle_cpus_mask" in sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 11/19] sched/topology: Introduce "nohz_shared_list" to keep track of sd->shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 12/19] sched/fair: Reorder the barrier in nohz_balance_enter_idle() K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 13/19] sched/fair: Extract the main _nohz_idle_balance() loop into a helper K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 14/19] sched/fair: Convert find_new_ilb() to use nohz_shared_list K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 15/19] sched/fair: Introduce sched_asym_prefer_idle() for ILB kick K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 16/19] sched/fair: Convert sched_balance_nohz_idle() to use nohz_shared_list K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 18/19] sched/fair: Optimize global "nohz.nr_cpus" tracking K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-24 20:02 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-25 2:37 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 4:15 ` [RFC PATCH 19/19] sched/topology: Add basic debug information for "nohz_shared_list" K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250904041516.3046-18-kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®