From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/7] sysfs: attribute_group: allow registration of const attribute
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 09:12:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251029-sysfs-const-attr-prep-v5-1-ea7d745acff4@weissschuh.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251029-sysfs-const-attr-prep-v5-0-ea7d745acff4@weissschuh.net>
To be able to constify instances of struct attribute it has to be
possible to add them to struct attribute_group. The current type of the
attrs member however is not compatible with that. Introduce a union that
allows registration of both const and non-const attributes to enable a
piecewise transition. As both union member types are compatible no
logic needs to be adapted.
Technically it is now possible register a const struct attribute and
receive it as mutable pointer in the callbacks. This is a soundness
issue. But this same soundness issue already exists today in
sysfs_create_file(). Also the struct definition and callback
implementation are always closely linked and are meant to be moved to
const in lockstep.
Similar to commit 906c508afdca ("sysfs: attribute_group: allow
registration of const bin_attribute")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
---
include/linux/sysfs.h | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sysfs.h b/include/linux/sysfs.h
index 9a25a2911652..e34d6af96abb 100644
--- a/include/linux/sysfs.h
+++ b/include/linux/sysfs.h
@@ -105,7 +105,10 @@ struct attribute_group {
size_t (*bin_size)(struct kobject *,
const struct bin_attribute *,
int);
- struct attribute **attrs;
+ union {
+ struct attribute **attrs;
+ const struct attribute *const *attrs_const;
+ };
const struct bin_attribute *const *bin_attrs;
};
--
2.51.1.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-29 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-29 8:12 [PATCH v5 0/7] sysfs: prepare the constification of struct attribute Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 8:12 ` Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
2025-10-29 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] sysfs: transparently handle const pointers in ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] sysfs: introduce __SYSFS_FUNCTION_ALTERNATIVE() Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] sysfs: attribute_group: enable const variants of is_visible() Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] samples/kobject: add is_visible() callback to attribute group Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] samples/kobject: constify 'struct foo_attribute' Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] sysfs: simplify attribute definition macros Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-26 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] sysfs: prepare the constification of struct attribute Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251029-sysfs-const-attr-prep-v5-1-ea7d745acff4@weissschuh.net \
--to=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®