From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/7] samples/kobject: add is_visible() callback to attribute group
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 09:12:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251029-sysfs-const-attr-prep-v5-5-ea7d745acff4@weissschuh.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251029-sysfs-const-attr-prep-v5-0-ea7d745acff4@weissschuh.net>
There was no example for the is_visible() callback so far.
It will also become an example and test for the constification of
'struct attribute' later.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
---
samples/kobject/kset-example.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/samples/kobject/kset-example.c b/samples/kobject/kset-example.c
index 579ce150217c..1aac595ed949 100644
--- a/samples/kobject/kset-example.c
+++ b/samples/kobject/kset-example.c
@@ -178,7 +178,22 @@ static struct attribute *foo_default_attrs[] = {
&bar_attribute.attr,
NULL, /* need to NULL terminate the list of attributes */
};
-ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(foo_default);
+
+static umode_t foo_default_attrs_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
+ struct attribute *attr,
+ int n)
+{
+ /* Hide attributes with the same name as the kobject. */
+ if (strcmp(kobject_name(kobj), attr->name) == 0)
+ return 0;
+ return attr->mode;
+}
+
+static const struct attribute_group foo_default_group = {
+ .attrs = foo_default_attrs,
+ .is_visible = foo_default_attrs_is_visible,
+};
+__ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(foo_default);
/*
* Our own ktype for our kobjects. Here we specify our sysfs ops, the
--
2.51.1.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-29 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-29 8:12 [PATCH v5 0/7] sysfs: prepare the constification of struct attribute Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] sysfs: attribute_group: allow registration of const attribute Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] sysfs: transparently handle const pointers in ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] sysfs: introduce __SYSFS_FUNCTION_ALTERNATIVE() Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] sysfs: attribute_group: enable const variants of is_visible() Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 8:12 ` Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
2025-10-29 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] samples/kobject: constify 'struct foo_attribute' Thomas Weißschuh
2025-10-29 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] sysfs: simplify attribute definition macros Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-26 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] sysfs: prepare the constification of struct attribute Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251029-sysfs-const-attr-prep-v5-5-ea7d745acff4@weissschuh.net \
--to=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®