From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xiaoyao.li@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] x86/split_lock: Fix and cleanup of cpu_model_supports_sld
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 16:00:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251218080044.2615106-1-xiaoyao.li@intel.com> (raw)
While considering Kiryl's suggestion[1], I'm wondering why we have
cpu_model_supports_sld defined, which seems like it could be replaced by
X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT.
Tracing through the history, I find that X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT
originally indicated whether the kernel enabled the split lock detection
feature, rather than enumerating hardware support for the feature, at the
time when cpu_model_supports_sld was introduced.
Now, the semantics of X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT have changed and
it enuemrates the hardware support for the feature. Therefore, patch 2
replaces cpu_model_supports_sld with X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT.
Patch 1 fixes a potential issue where MSR_TEST_CTRL can be written when
the split lock detection feature is not available, which can cause bizarre
behavior.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/lvobu4gpfsjg63syubgy2jwcja72folflrst7bu2eqv6rhaqre@ttbkykphu32f/
Xiaoyao Li (2):
x86/split_lock: Fix handling in split_lock_init()
x86/split_lock: Drop cpu_model_supports_sld
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bus_lock.c | 14 ++++----------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-12-18 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-18 8:00 Xiaoyao Li [this message]
2025-12-18 8:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/split_lock: Fix handling in split_lock_init() Xiaoyao Li
2025-12-18 8:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/split_lock: Drop cpu_model_supports_sld Xiaoyao Li
2026-03-06 2:59 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86/split_lock: Fix and cleanup of cpu_model_supports_sld Xiaoyao Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251218080044.2615106-1-xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--to=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®