* [PATCH] btrfs: Fix -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
@ 2025-12-18 8:16 Qiang Ma
2025-12-18 20:37 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Qiang Ma @ 2025-12-18 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: clm, dsterba; +Cc: linux-btrfs, linux-kernel, Qiang Ma
Fix a -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning by initializing
the variable to NULL.
$ make CFLAGS_tree-log.o=-Wmaybe-uninitialized
In file included from fs/btrfs/ctree.h:21,
from fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:12:
fs/btrfs/accessors.h: In function 'replay_one_buffer':
fs/btrfs/accessors.h:66:16: warning: 'inode_item' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
66 | return btrfs_get_##bits(eb, s, offsetof(type, member)); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:2803:42: note: 'inode_item' declared here
2803 | struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
Warning was found when compiling using loongarch64-gcc 12.3.1.
Signed-off-by: Qiang Ma <maqianga@uniontech.com>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
index 31edc93a383e..0d6faaaa70f1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -2798,7 +2798,7 @@ static int replay_one_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb,
nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(eb);
for (wc->log_slot = 0; wc->log_slot < nritems; wc->log_slot++) {
- struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item;
+ struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item = NULL;
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &wc->log_key, wc->log_slot);
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
2025-12-18 8:16 [PATCH] btrfs: Fix -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning Qiang Ma
@ 2025-12-18 20:37 ` David Sterba
2025-12-19 3:11 ` Qiang Ma
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2025-12-18 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qiang Ma; +Cc: clm, dsterba, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 04:16:18PM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote:
> Fix a -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning by initializing
> the variable to NULL.
>
> $ make CFLAGS_tree-log.o=-Wmaybe-uninitialized
>
> In file included from fs/btrfs/ctree.h:21,
> from fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:12:
> fs/btrfs/accessors.h: In function 'replay_one_buffer':
> fs/btrfs/accessors.h:66:16: warning: 'inode_item' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> 66 | return btrfs_get_##bits(eb, s, offsetof(type, member)); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:2803:42: note: 'inode_item' declared here
> 2803 | struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item;
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>
> Warning was found when compiling using loongarch64-gcc 12.3.1.
We have the -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning enabled per fs/btrfs/
directory, there are no other known reports fixing the uninitialized
inode_item so this might be specific to loongarch gcc 12.x. I'll add the
patch to for-next as we still want to get all the warnings fixed, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
2025-12-18 20:37 ` David Sterba
@ 2025-12-19 3:11 ` Qiang Ma
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Qiang Ma @ 2025-12-19 3:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dsterba; +Cc: clm, dsterba, linux-btrfs, linux-kernel
在 2025/12/19 04:37, David Sterba 写道:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 04:16:18PM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote:
>> Fix a -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning by initializing
>> the variable to NULL.
>>
>> $ make CFLAGS_tree-log.o=-Wmaybe-uninitialized
>>
>> In file included from fs/btrfs/ctree.h:21,
>> from fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:12:
>> fs/btrfs/accessors.h: In function 'replay_one_buffer':
>> fs/btrfs/accessors.h:66:16: warning: 'inode_item' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>> 66 | return btrfs_get_##bits(eb, s, offsetof(type, member)); \
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>> fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:2803:42: note: 'inode_item' declared here
>> 2803 | struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item;
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Warning was found when compiling using loongarch64-gcc 12.3.1.
> We have the -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning enabled per fs/btrfs/
> directory, there are no other known reports fixing the uninitialized
> inode_item so this might be specific to loongarch gcc 12.x. I'll add the
Yes, x86 and arm64 did not report this warning issue.
> patch to for-next as we still want to get all the warnings fixed, thanks.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-12-19 3:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-12-18 8:16 [PATCH] btrfs: Fix -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning Qiang Ma
2025-12-18 20:37 ` David Sterba
2025-12-19 3:11 ` Qiang Ma
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®