From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Cc: void@manifault.com, arighi@nvidia.com, changwoo@igalia.com,
emil@etsalapatis.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/15] sched_ext: Add reenq_flags plumbing to scx_bpf_dsq_reenq()
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 09:06:17 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260306190623.1076074-10-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260306190623.1076074-1-tj@kernel.org>
Add infrastructure to pass flags through the deferred reenqueue path.
reenq_local() now takes a reenq_flags parameter, and scx_sched_pcpu gains a
deferred_reenq_local_flags field to accumulate flags from multiple
scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() calls before processing. No flags are defined yet.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
kernel/sched/ext_internal.h | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index b02143b10f0f..c9b0e94d59bd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -1080,7 +1080,8 @@ static void schedule_deferred_locked(struct rq *rq)
schedule_deferred(rq);
}
-static void schedule_dsq_reenq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq)
+static void schedule_dsq_reenq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq,
+ u64 reenq_flags)
{
/*
* Allowing reenqueues doesn't make sense while bypassing. This also
@@ -1097,6 +1098,7 @@ static void schedule_dsq_reenq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq
scoped_guard (raw_spinlock_irqsave, &rq->scx.deferred_reenq_lock) {
if (list_empty(&drl->node))
list_move_tail(&drl->node, &rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals);
+ drl->flags |= reenq_flags;
}
schedule_deferred(rq);
@@ -3618,7 +3620,14 @@ int scx_check_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy)
return 0;
}
-static u32 reenq_local(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq)
+static bool task_should_reenq(struct task_struct *p, u64 reenq_flags)
+{
+ if (reenq_flags & SCX_REENQ_ANY)
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
+static u32 reenq_local(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq, u64 reenq_flags)
{
LIST_HEAD(tasks);
u32 nr_enqueued = 0;
@@ -3652,6 +3661,9 @@ static u32 reenq_local(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq)
if (!scx_is_descendant(task_sch, sch))
continue;
+ if (!task_should_reenq(p, reenq_flags))
+ continue;
+
dispatch_dequeue(rq, p);
list_add_tail(&p->scx.dsq_list.node, &tasks);
}
@@ -3671,6 +3683,7 @@ static void process_deferred_reenq_locals(struct rq *rq)
while (true) {
struct scx_sched *sch;
+ u64 reenq_flags = 0;
scoped_guard (raw_spinlock, &rq->scx.deferred_reenq_lock) {
struct scx_deferred_reenq_local *drl =
@@ -3685,10 +3698,11 @@ static void process_deferred_reenq_locals(struct rq *rq)
sch_pcpu = container_of(drl, struct scx_sched_pcpu,
deferred_reenq_local);
sch = sch_pcpu->sch;
+ swap(drl->flags, reenq_flags);
list_del_init(&drl->node);
}
- reenq_local(sch, rq);
+ reenq_local(sch, rq, reenq_flags);
}
}
@@ -7817,7 +7831,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc u32 scx_bpf_reenqueue_local(const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
rq = cpu_rq(smp_processor_id());
lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
- return reenq_local(sch, rq);
+ return reenq_local(sch, rq, 0);
}
__bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
@@ -8255,8 +8269,17 @@ __bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_dsq_reenq(u64 dsq_id, u64 reenq_flags,
if (unlikely(!sch))
return;
+ if (unlikely(reenq_flags & ~__SCX_REENQ_USER_MASK)) {
+ scx_error(sch, "invalid SCX_REENQ flags 0x%llx", reenq_flags);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* not specifying any filter bits is the same as %SCX_REENQ_ANY */
+ if (!(reenq_flags & __SCX_REENQ_FILTER_MASK))
+ reenq_flags |= SCX_REENQ_ANY;
+
dsq = find_dsq_for_dispatch(sch, this_rq(), dsq_id, smp_processor_id());
- schedule_dsq_reenq(sch, dsq);
+ schedule_dsq_reenq(sch, dsq, reenq_flags);
}
/**
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
index 1a8d61097cab..d9eda2e8701c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
@@ -956,6 +956,7 @@ struct scx_dsp_ctx {
struct scx_deferred_reenq_local {
struct list_head node;
+ u64 flags;
};
struct scx_sched_pcpu {
@@ -1128,6 +1129,15 @@ enum scx_deq_flags {
SCX_DEQ_SCHED_CHANGE = 1LLU << 33,
};
+enum scx_reenq_flags {
+ /* low 16bits determine which tasks should be reenqueued */
+ SCX_REENQ_ANY = 1LLU << 0, /* all tasks */
+
+ __SCX_REENQ_FILTER_MASK = 0xffffLLU,
+
+ __SCX_REENQ_USER_MASK = SCX_REENQ_ANY,
+};
+
enum scx_pick_idle_cpu_flags {
SCX_PICK_IDLE_CORE = 1LLU << 0, /* pick a CPU whose SMT siblings are also idle */
SCX_PICK_IDLE_IN_NODE = 1LLU << 1, /* pick a CPU in the same target NUMA node */
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-06 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 19:06 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Overhaul DSQ reenqueue infrastructure Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 01/15] sched_ext: Relocate scx_bpf_task_cgroup() and its BTF_ID to the end of kfunc section Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:45 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:20 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched_ext: Wrap global DSQs in per-node structure Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:52 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:20 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 03/15] sched_ext: Factor out pnode allocation and deallocation into helpers Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:54 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:21 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 04/15] sched_ext: Change find_global_dsq() to take CPU number instead of task Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 21:06 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 22:33 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 23:21 ` [PATCH " Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 05/15] sched_ext: Relocate reenq_local() and run_deferred() Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 21:09 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:34 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-07 0:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] sched_ext: Relocate run_deferred() and its callees Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 06/15] sched_ext: Convert deferred_reenq_locals from llist to regular list Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:12 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-09 17:16 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 07/15] sched_ext: Wrap deferred_reenq_local_node into a struct Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:16 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 08/15] sched_ext: Introduce scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() for remote local DSQ reenqueue Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:33 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-03-09 17:47 ` [PATCH 09/15] sched_ext: Add reenq_flags plumbing to scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 10/15] sched_ext: Add per-CPU data to DSQs Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 22:54 ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-06 22:56 ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-06 23:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 11/15] sched_ext: Factor out nldsq_cursor_next_task() and nldsq_cursor_lost_task() Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 12/15] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() for user DSQs Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched_ext: Optimize schedule_dsq_reenq() with lockless fast path Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched_ext: Simplify task state handling Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 15/15] sched_ext: Add SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON flags Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 23:14 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Overhaul DSQ reenqueue infrastructure Andrea Righi
2026-03-07 15:38 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260306190623.1076074-10-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome