mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<sched-ext@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: <void@manifault.com>, <arighi@nvidia.com>, <changwoo@igalia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] sched_ext: Convert deferred_reenq_locals from llist to regular list
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 13:12:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DGYF3L29QDRO.367HHV8YV77QW@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260306190623.1076074-7-tj@kernel.org>

On Fri Mar 6, 2026 at 2:06 PM EST, Tejun Heo wrote:
> The deferred reenqueue local mechanism uses an llist (lockless list) for
> collecting schedulers that need their local DSQs re-enqueued. Convert to a
> regular list protected by a raw_spinlock.
>
> The llist was used for its lockless properties, but the upcoming changes to
> support remote reenqueue require more complex list operations that are
> difficult to implement correctly with lockless data structures. A spinlock-
> protected regular list provides the necessary flexibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>


Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>

> ---
>  kernel/sched/ext.c          | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  kernel/sched/ext_internal.h |  2 +-
>  kernel/sched/sched.h        |  3 +-
>  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index 1b6cd1e4f8b9..ffccaf04e34d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -3640,23 +3640,37 @@ static u32 reenq_local(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq)
>  	return nr_enqueued;
>  }
>  
> -static void run_deferred(struct rq *rq)
> +static void process_deferred_reenq_locals(struct rq *rq)
>  {
> -	process_ddsp_deferred_locals(rq);
> -
> -	if (!llist_empty(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals)) {
> -		struct llist_node *llist =
> -			llist_del_all(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals);
> -		struct scx_sched_pcpu *pos, *next;
> +	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
>  
> -		llist_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, llist,
> -					  deferred_reenq_locals_node) {
> -			init_llist_node(&pos->deferred_reenq_locals_node);
> -			reenq_local(pos->sch, rq);
> +	while (true) {
> +		struct scx_sched *sch;
> +
> +		scoped_guard (raw_spinlock, &rq->scx.deferred_reenq_lock) {
> +			struct scx_sched_pcpu *sch_pcpu =
> +				list_first_entry_or_null(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals,
> +							 struct scx_sched_pcpu,
> +							 deferred_reenq_local_node);
> +			if (!sch_pcpu)
> +				return;
> +
> +			sch = sch_pcpu->sch;

While both scx and sch_pcpu aren't used in this patch, they are useful
for subsequent patches.

> +			list_del_init(&sch_pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node);
>  		}
> +
> +		reenq_local(sch, rq);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void run_deferred(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +	process_ddsp_deferred_locals(rq);
> +
> +	if (!list_empty(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals))
> +		process_deferred_reenq_locals(rq);
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
>  bool scx_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
>  {
> @@ -4180,13 +4194,13 @@ static void scx_sched_free_rcu_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * $sch would have entered bypass mode before the RCU grace period. As
> -	 * that blocks new deferrals, all deferred_reenq_locals_node's must be
> +	 * that blocks new deferrals, all deferred_reenq_local_node's must be
>  	 * off-list by now.
>  	 */
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>  		struct scx_sched_pcpu *pcpu = per_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu, cpu);
>  
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(llist_on_list(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_locals_node));
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node));
>  	}
>  
>  	free_percpu(sch->pcpu);
> @@ -5799,7 +5813,7 @@ static struct scx_sched *scx_alloc_and_add_sched(struct sched_ext_ops *ops,
>  		struct scx_sched_pcpu *pcpu = per_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu, cpu);
>  
>  		pcpu->sch = sch;
> -		init_llist_node(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_locals_node);
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node);
>  	}
>  
>  	sch->helper = kthread_run_worker(0, "sched_ext_helper");
> @@ -7126,7 +7140,8 @@ void __init init_sched_ext_class(void)
>  		BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scx.cpus_to_kick_if_idle, GFP_KERNEL, n));
>  		BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scx.cpus_to_preempt, GFP_KERNEL, n));
>  		BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scx.cpus_to_wait, GFP_KERNEL, n));
> -		init_llist_head(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals);
> +		raw_spin_lock_init(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_lock);
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals);
>  		rq->scx.deferred_irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(deferred_irq_workfn);
>  		rq->scx.kick_cpus_irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(kick_cpus_irq_workfn);
>  
> @@ -8358,7 +8373,6 @@ __bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_reenqueue_local___v2(const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	struct scx_sched *sch;
>  	struct rq *rq;
> -	struct llist_node *lnode;
>  
>  	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
>  
> @@ -8374,9 +8388,14 @@ __bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_reenqueue_local___v2(const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
>  		goto out_irq_restore;
>  
>  	rq = this_rq();
> -	lnode = &this_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu)->deferred_reenq_locals_node;
> -	if (!llist_on_list(lnode))
> -		llist_add(lnode, &rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals);
> +	scoped_guard (raw_spinlock, &rq->scx.deferred_reenq_lock) {
> +		struct scx_sched_pcpu *pcpu = this_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu);
> +
> +		if (list_empty(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node))
> +			list_move_tail(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node,
> +				       &rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals);
> +	}
> +
>  	schedule_deferred(rq);
>  out_irq_restore:
>  	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> index 9e5ebd00ea0c..80d40a9c5ad9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> @@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ struct scx_sched_pcpu {
>  	 */
>  	struct scx_event_stats	event_stats;
>  
> -	struct llist_node	deferred_reenq_locals_node;
> +	struct list_head	deferred_reenq_local_node;
>  	struct scx_dispatch_q	bypass_dsq;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_EXT_SUB_SCHED
>  	u32			bypass_host_seq;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index ebe971d12cb8..0794852524e7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -808,7 +808,8 @@ struct scx_rq {
>  
>  	struct task_struct	*sub_dispatch_prev;
>  
> -	struct llist_head	deferred_reenq_locals;
> +	raw_spinlock_t		deferred_reenq_lock;
> +	struct list_head	deferred_reenq_locals;	/* scheds requesting reenq of local DSQ */
>  	struct balance_callback	deferred_bal_cb;
>  	struct irq_work		deferred_irq_work;
>  	struct irq_work		kick_cpus_irq_work;


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-09 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-06 19:06 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Overhaul DSQ reenqueue infrastructure Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 01/15] sched_ext: Relocate scx_bpf_task_cgroup() and its BTF_ID to the end of kfunc section Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:45   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:20   ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched_ext: Wrap global DSQs in per-node structure Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:52   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:20   ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 03/15] sched_ext: Factor out pnode allocation and deallocation into helpers Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:54   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:21   ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 04/15] sched_ext: Change find_global_dsq() to take CPU number instead of task Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 21:06   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 22:33   ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 23:21   ` [PATCH " Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 05/15] sched_ext: Relocate reenq_local() and run_deferred() Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 21:09   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:34   ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-07  0:12   ` [PATCH v2 05/15] sched_ext: Relocate run_deferred() and its callees Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 06/15] sched_ext: Convert deferred_reenq_locals from llist to regular list Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:12   ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
2026-03-09 17:16     ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 07/15] sched_ext: Wrap deferred_reenq_local_node into a struct Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:16   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 08/15] sched_ext: Introduce scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() for remote local DSQ reenqueue Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:33   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 09/15] sched_ext: Add reenq_flags plumbing to scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:47   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 10/15] sched_ext: Add per-CPU data to DSQs Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 22:54   ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-06 22:56     ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-06 23:09   ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 11/15] sched_ext: Factor out nldsq_cursor_next_task() and nldsq_cursor_lost_task() Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 12/15] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() for user DSQs Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched_ext: Optimize schedule_dsq_reenq() with lockless fast path Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched_ext: Simplify task state handling Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 15/15] sched_ext: Add SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON flags Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 23:14 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Overhaul DSQ reenqueue infrastructure Andrea Righi
2026-03-07 15:38 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DGYF3L29QDRO.367HHV8YV77QW@etsalapatis.com \
    --to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome