From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<sched-ext@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: <void@manifault.com>, <arighi@nvidia.com>, <changwoo@igalia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] sched_ext: Convert deferred_reenq_locals from llist to regular list
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 13:12:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DGYF3L29QDRO.367HHV8YV77QW@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260306190623.1076074-7-tj@kernel.org>
On Fri Mar 6, 2026 at 2:06 PM EST, Tejun Heo wrote:
> The deferred reenqueue local mechanism uses an llist (lockless list) for
> collecting schedulers that need their local DSQs re-enqueued. Convert to a
> regular list protected by a raw_spinlock.
>
> The llist was used for its lockless properties, but the upcoming changes to
> support remote reenqueue require more complex list operations that are
> difficult to implement correctly with lockless data structures. A spinlock-
> protected regular list provides the necessary flexibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> kernel/sched/ext_internal.h | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 3 +-
> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index 1b6cd1e4f8b9..ffccaf04e34d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -3640,23 +3640,37 @@ static u32 reenq_local(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq)
> return nr_enqueued;
> }
>
> -static void run_deferred(struct rq *rq)
> +static void process_deferred_reenq_locals(struct rq *rq)
> {
> - process_ddsp_deferred_locals(rq);
> -
> - if (!llist_empty(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals)) {
> - struct llist_node *llist =
> - llist_del_all(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals);
> - struct scx_sched_pcpu *pos, *next;
> + lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
>
> - llist_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, llist,
> - deferred_reenq_locals_node) {
> - init_llist_node(&pos->deferred_reenq_locals_node);
> - reenq_local(pos->sch, rq);
> + while (true) {
> + struct scx_sched *sch;
> +
> + scoped_guard (raw_spinlock, &rq->scx.deferred_reenq_lock) {
> + struct scx_sched_pcpu *sch_pcpu =
> + list_first_entry_or_null(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals,
> + struct scx_sched_pcpu,
> + deferred_reenq_local_node);
> + if (!sch_pcpu)
> + return;
> +
> + sch = sch_pcpu->sch;
While both scx and sch_pcpu aren't used in this patch, they are useful
for subsequent patches.
> + list_del_init(&sch_pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node);
> }
> +
> + reenq_local(sch, rq);
> }
> }
>
> +static void run_deferred(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> + process_ddsp_deferred_locals(rq);
> +
> + if (!list_empty(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals))
> + process_deferred_reenq_locals(rq);
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> bool scx_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
> {
> @@ -4180,13 +4194,13 @@ static void scx_sched_free_rcu_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> /*
> * $sch would have entered bypass mode before the RCU grace period. As
> - * that blocks new deferrals, all deferred_reenq_locals_node's must be
> + * that blocks new deferrals, all deferred_reenq_local_node's must be
> * off-list by now.
> */
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> struct scx_sched_pcpu *pcpu = per_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu, cpu);
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(llist_on_list(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_locals_node));
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node));
> }
>
> free_percpu(sch->pcpu);
> @@ -5799,7 +5813,7 @@ static struct scx_sched *scx_alloc_and_add_sched(struct sched_ext_ops *ops,
> struct scx_sched_pcpu *pcpu = per_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu, cpu);
>
> pcpu->sch = sch;
> - init_llist_node(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_locals_node);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node);
> }
>
> sch->helper = kthread_run_worker(0, "sched_ext_helper");
> @@ -7126,7 +7140,8 @@ void __init init_sched_ext_class(void)
> BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scx.cpus_to_kick_if_idle, GFP_KERNEL, n));
> BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scx.cpus_to_preempt, GFP_KERNEL, n));
> BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&rq->scx.cpus_to_wait, GFP_KERNEL, n));
> - init_llist_head(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals);
> + raw_spin_lock_init(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_lock);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals);
> rq->scx.deferred_irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(deferred_irq_workfn);
> rq->scx.kick_cpus_irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(kick_cpus_irq_workfn);
>
> @@ -8358,7 +8373,6 @@ __bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_reenqueue_local___v2(const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
> unsigned long flags;
> struct scx_sched *sch;
> struct rq *rq;
> - struct llist_node *lnode;
>
> raw_local_irq_save(flags);
>
> @@ -8374,9 +8388,14 @@ __bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_reenqueue_local___v2(const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
> goto out_irq_restore;
>
> rq = this_rq();
> - lnode = &this_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu)->deferred_reenq_locals_node;
> - if (!llist_on_list(lnode))
> - llist_add(lnode, &rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals);
> + scoped_guard (raw_spinlock, &rq->scx.deferred_reenq_lock) {
> + struct scx_sched_pcpu *pcpu = this_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu);
> +
> + if (list_empty(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node))
> + list_move_tail(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node,
> + &rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals);
> + }
> +
> schedule_deferred(rq);
> out_irq_restore:
> raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> index 9e5ebd00ea0c..80d40a9c5ad9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> @@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ struct scx_sched_pcpu {
> */
> struct scx_event_stats event_stats;
>
> - struct llist_node deferred_reenq_locals_node;
> + struct list_head deferred_reenq_local_node;
> struct scx_dispatch_q bypass_dsq;
> #ifdef CONFIG_EXT_SUB_SCHED
> u32 bypass_host_seq;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index ebe971d12cb8..0794852524e7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -808,7 +808,8 @@ struct scx_rq {
>
> struct task_struct *sub_dispatch_prev;
>
> - struct llist_head deferred_reenq_locals;
> + raw_spinlock_t deferred_reenq_lock;
> + struct list_head deferred_reenq_locals; /* scheds requesting reenq of local DSQ */
> struct balance_callback deferred_bal_cb;
> struct irq_work deferred_irq_work;
> struct irq_work kick_cpus_irq_work;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 19:06 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Overhaul DSQ reenqueue infrastructure Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 01/15] sched_ext: Relocate scx_bpf_task_cgroup() and its BTF_ID to the end of kfunc section Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:45 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:20 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched_ext: Wrap global DSQs in per-node structure Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:52 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:20 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 03/15] sched_ext: Factor out pnode allocation and deallocation into helpers Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:54 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:21 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 04/15] sched_ext: Change find_global_dsq() to take CPU number instead of task Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 21:06 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 22:33 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 23:21 ` [PATCH " Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 05/15] sched_ext: Relocate reenq_local() and run_deferred() Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 21:09 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:34 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-07 0:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] sched_ext: Relocate run_deferred() and its callees Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 06/15] sched_ext: Convert deferred_reenq_locals from llist to regular list Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:12 ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
2026-03-09 17:16 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 07/15] sched_ext: Wrap deferred_reenq_local_node into a struct Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:16 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 08/15] sched_ext: Introduce scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() for remote local DSQ reenqueue Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:33 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 09/15] sched_ext: Add reenq_flags plumbing to scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:47 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 10/15] sched_ext: Add per-CPU data to DSQs Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 22:54 ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-06 22:56 ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-06 23:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 11/15] sched_ext: Factor out nldsq_cursor_next_task() and nldsq_cursor_lost_task() Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 12/15] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() for user DSQs Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched_ext: Optimize schedule_dsq_reenq() with lockless fast path Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched_ext: Simplify task state handling Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 15/15] sched_ext: Add SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON flags Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 23:14 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Overhaul DSQ reenqueue infrastructure Andrea Righi
2026-03-07 15:38 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DGYF3L29QDRO.367HHV8YV77QW@etsalapatis.com \
--to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome