From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<sched-ext@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: <void@manifault.com>, <arighi@nvidia.com>, <changwoo@igalia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] sched_ext: Wrap deferred_reenq_local_node into a struct
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 13:16:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DGYF77XUIBT5.RJTOMX9QQMWM@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260306190623.1076074-8-tj@kernel.org>
On Fri Mar 6, 2026 at 2:06 PM EST, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Wrap the deferred_reenq_local_node list_head into struct
> scx_deferred_reenq_local. More fields will be added and this allows using a
> shorthand pointer to access them.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> kernel/sched/ext_internal.h | 6 +++++-
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index ffccaf04e34d..80d1e6ccc326 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -3648,15 +3648,19 @@ static void process_deferred_reenq_locals(struct rq *rq)
> struct scx_sched *sch;
>
> scoped_guard (raw_spinlock, &rq->scx.deferred_reenq_lock) {
> - struct scx_sched_pcpu *sch_pcpu =
> + struct scx_deferred_reenq_local *drl =
> list_first_entry_or_null(&rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals,
> - struct scx_sched_pcpu,
> - deferred_reenq_local_node);
> - if (!sch_pcpu)
> + struct scx_deferred_reenq_local,
> + node);
> + struct scx_sched_pcpu *sch_pcpu;
> +
> + if (!drl)
> return;
>
> + sch_pcpu = container_of(drl, struct scx_sched_pcpu,
> + deferred_reenq_local);
> sch = sch_pcpu->sch;
> - list_del_init(&sch_pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node);
> + list_del_init(&drl->node);
> }
>
> reenq_local(sch, rq);
> @@ -4200,7 +4204,7 @@ static void scx_sched_free_rcu_work(struct work_struct *work)
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> struct scx_sched_pcpu *pcpu = per_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu, cpu);
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node));
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local.node));
> }
>
> free_percpu(sch->pcpu);
> @@ -5813,7 +5817,7 @@ static struct scx_sched *scx_alloc_and_add_sched(struct sched_ext_ops *ops,
> struct scx_sched_pcpu *pcpu = per_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu, cpu);
>
> pcpu->sch = sch;
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local.node);
> }
>
> sch->helper = kthread_run_worker(0, "sched_ext_helper");
> @@ -8391,8 +8395,8 @@ __bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_reenqueue_local___v2(const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
> scoped_guard (raw_spinlock, &rq->scx.deferred_reenq_lock) {
> struct scx_sched_pcpu *pcpu = this_cpu_ptr(sch->pcpu);
>
> - if (list_empty(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node))
> - list_move_tail(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local_node,
> + if (list_empty(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local.node))
> + list_move_tail(&pcpu->deferred_reenq_local.node,
> &rq->scx.deferred_reenq_locals);
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> index 80d40a9c5ad9..1a8d61097cab 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
> @@ -954,6 +954,10 @@ struct scx_dsp_ctx {
> struct scx_dsp_buf_ent buf[];
> };
>
> +struct scx_deferred_reenq_local {
> + struct list_head node;
> +};
> +
> struct scx_sched_pcpu {
> struct scx_sched *sch;
> u64 flags; /* protected by rq lock */
> @@ -965,7 +969,7 @@ struct scx_sched_pcpu {
> */
> struct scx_event_stats event_stats;
>
> - struct list_head deferred_reenq_local_node;
> + struct scx_deferred_reenq_local deferred_reenq_local;
> struct scx_dispatch_q bypass_dsq;
> #ifdef CONFIG_EXT_SUB_SCHED
> u32 bypass_host_seq;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 19:06 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Overhaul DSQ reenqueue infrastructure Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 01/15] sched_ext: Relocate scx_bpf_task_cgroup() and its BTF_ID to the end of kfunc section Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:45 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:20 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched_ext: Wrap global DSQs in per-node structure Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:52 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:20 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 03/15] sched_ext: Factor out pnode allocation and deallocation into helpers Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 20:54 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:21 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 04/15] sched_ext: Change find_global_dsq() to take CPU number instead of task Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 21:06 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 22:33 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 23:21 ` [PATCH " Daniel Jordan
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 05/15] sched_ext: Relocate reenq_local() and run_deferred() Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 21:09 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 23:34 ` Daniel Jordan
2026-03-07 0:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] sched_ext: Relocate run_deferred() and its callees Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 06/15] sched_ext: Convert deferred_reenq_locals from llist to regular list Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:12 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-09 17:16 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 07/15] sched_ext: Wrap deferred_reenq_local_node into a struct Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:16 ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 08/15] sched_ext: Introduce scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() for remote local DSQ reenqueue Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:33 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 09/15] sched_ext: Add reenq_flags plumbing to scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() Tejun Heo
2026-03-09 17:47 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 10/15] sched_ext: Add per-CPU data to DSQs Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 22:54 ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-06 22:56 ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-06 23:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 11/15] sched_ext: Factor out nldsq_cursor_next_task() and nldsq_cursor_lost_task() Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 12/15] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() for user DSQs Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched_ext: Optimize schedule_dsq_reenq() with lockless fast path Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched_ext: Simplify task state handling Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 15/15] sched_ext: Add SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON flags Tejun Heo
2026-03-06 23:14 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Overhaul DSQ reenqueue infrastructure Andrea Righi
2026-03-07 15:38 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DGYF77XUIBT5.RJTOMX9QQMWM@etsalapatis.com \
--to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®