From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>,
ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
Cc: ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] ocfs2: consolidate extent list validation into block read callbacks
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 17:07:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260403090803.3860971-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
ocfs2 validates extent list fields (l_count, l_next_free_rec) at various
points during extent tree traversal. This is fragile because each caller
must remember to check for corrupted on-disk data before using it.
This series moves those checks into the block read validation callbacks
(ocfs2_validate_dx_root and ocfs2_validate_extent_block), so corrupted
fields are caught early at block read time. Redundant post-read checks
are then removed.
Patch 1-2 handle the dx_root extent list:
- Move l_count and l_next_free_rec validation into
ocfs2_validate_dx_root(), skipping inline dx roots.
- Remove the now-redundant l_next_free_rec == 0 check in
ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec() and rework the error message to avoid a
potential NULL pointer dereference of rec.
Patch 3-4 handle extent blocks:
- Add l_count and l_next_free_rec validation to
ocfs2_validate_extent_block().
- Remove the duplicate l_next_free_rec > l_count check in
__ocfs2_find_path().
Joseph Qi (4):
ocfs2: validate dx_root extent list fields during block read
ocfs2: remove empty extent list check in ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec()
ocfs2: validate extent block list fields during block read
ocfs2: remove redundant l_next_free_rec check in __ocfs2_find_path()
fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--
2.39.3
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-03 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-03 9:07 Joseph Qi [this message]
2026-04-03 9:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] ocfs2: validate dx_root extent list fields during block read Joseph Qi
2026-04-07 14:58 ` Heming Zhao
2026-04-03 9:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] ocfs2: remove empty extent list check in ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec() Joseph Qi
2026-04-07 14:59 ` Heming Zhao
2026-04-03 9:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] ocfs2: validate extent block list fields during block read Joseph Qi
2026-04-07 15:00 ` Heming Zhao
2026-04-03 9:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] ocfs2: remove redundant l_next_free_rec check in __ocfs2_find_path() Joseph Qi
2026-04-07 15:01 ` Heming Zhao
2026-04-03 19:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] ocfs2: consolidate extent list validation into block read callbacks Andrew Morton
2026-04-07 1:44 ` Joseph Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260403090803.3860971-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gality369@gmail.com \
--cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®