From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>,
ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
Cc: ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ocfs2: validate dx_root extent list fields during block read
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 17:08:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260403090803.3860971-2-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403090803.3860971-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Move the extent list l_count validation from ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec()
into ocfs2_validate_dx_root(), so that corrupted on-disk fields are
caught early at block read time rather than during directory lookups.
Additionally, add a l_next_free_rec <= l_count check to prevent
out-of-bounds access when iterating over extent records.
Both checks are skipped for inline dx roots (OCFS2_DX_FLAG_INLINE),
which use dr_entries instead of dr_list.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
index 1c8abf2c592c..82e720c8ba32 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ static int ocfs2_validate_dx_root(struct super_block *sb,
mlog(ML_ERROR,
"Checksum failed for dir index root block %llu\n",
(unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr);
- return ret;
+ goto bail;
}
if (!OCFS2_IS_VALID_DX_ROOT(dx_root)) {
@@ -601,8 +601,32 @@ static int ocfs2_validate_dx_root(struct super_block *sb,
"Dir Index Root # %llu has bad signature %.*s\n",
(unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_blkno),
7, dx_root->dr_signature);
+ goto bail;
+ }
+
+ if (!(dx_root->dr_flags & OCFS2_DX_FLAG_INLINE)) {
+ struct ocfs2_extent_list *el = &dx_root->dr_list;
+
+ if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_count) != ocfs2_extent_recs_per_dx_root(sb)) {
+ ret = ocfs2_error(sb,
+ "Dir Index Root # %llu has invalid l_count %u (expected %u)\n",
+ (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_blkno),
+ le16_to_cpu(el->l_count),
+ ocfs2_extent_recs_per_dx_root(sb));
+ goto bail;
+ }
+
+ if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) > le16_to_cpu(el->l_count)) {
+ ret = ocfs2_error(sb,
+ "Dir Index Root # %llu has invalid l_next_free_rec %u (l_count %u)\n",
+ (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_blkno),
+ le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec),
+ le16_to_cpu(el->l_count));
+ goto bail;
+ }
}
+bail:
return ret;
}
@@ -791,14 +815,6 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec(struct inode *inode,
struct ocfs2_extent_block *eb;
struct ocfs2_extent_rec *rec = NULL;
- if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_count) !=
- ocfs2_extent_recs_per_dx_root(inode->i_sb)) {
- ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
- "Inode %lu has invalid extent list length %u\n",
- inode->i_ino, le16_to_cpu(el->l_count));
- goto out;
- }
-
if (el->l_tree_depth) {
ret = ocfs2_find_leaf(INODE_CACHE(inode), el, major_hash,
&eb_bh);
--
2.39.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-03 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-03 9:07 [PATCH 0/4] ocfs2: consolidate extent list validation into block read callbacks Joseph Qi
2026-04-03 9:08 ` Joseph Qi [this message]
2026-04-07 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] ocfs2: validate dx_root extent list fields during block read Heming Zhao
2026-04-03 9:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] ocfs2: remove empty extent list check in ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec() Joseph Qi
2026-04-07 14:59 ` Heming Zhao
2026-04-03 9:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] ocfs2: validate extent block list fields during block read Joseph Qi
2026-04-07 15:00 ` Heming Zhao
2026-04-03 9:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] ocfs2: remove redundant l_next_free_rec check in __ocfs2_find_path() Joseph Qi
2026-04-07 15:01 ` Heming Zhao
2026-04-03 19:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] ocfs2: consolidate extent list validation into block read callbacks Andrew Morton
2026-04-07 1:44 ` Joseph Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260403090803.3860971-2-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gality369@gmail.com \
--cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®