* [PATCH] futex: Drop CLONE_THREAD requirement for private default hash alloc
@ 2026-05-02 15:57 Mohamed Ayman
2026-05-02 17:24 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mohamed Ayman @ 2026-05-02 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kees Cook, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, K Prateek Nayak, Andrew Morton,
David Hildenbrand, Lorenzo Stoakes, Liam R. Howlett,
Vlastimil Babka, Mike Rapoport, Suren Baghdasaryan, Michal Hocko,
Borislav Petkov (AMD),
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, open list:EXEC & BINFMT API, ELF,
open list:SCHEDULER
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso, Yiming Qian, Linus Torvalds,
open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - CORE, open list:SCHEDULER
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Currently need_futex_hash_allocate_default() depends on strict pthread
semantics, abusing CLONE_THREAD. This breaks the non-concurrency
assumptions when doing the mm->futex_ref pcpu allocations, leading to
bugs[0] when sharing the mm in other ways; ie:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in futex_hash_put
... where the +1 bias can end up on a percpu counter that mm->futex_ref
no longer points at.
Loosen the check to cover any CLONE_VM clone, except vfork(). Excluding
vfork keeps the existing paths untouched (no overhead), and we can't
race in the first place: either the parent is suspended and the child
runs alone, or mm->futex_ref is already allocated from an earlier
CLONE_VM.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_bE8LsmCQ-FAtYDuwbJhOkt9p2wwYQwAbMh=PifC=VsiBM6A@mail.gmail.com/ [0]
Fixes: d9b05321e21e ("futex: Move futex_hash_free() back to __mmput()")
Reported-by: Yiming Qian <yimingqian591@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/fork.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index f1ad69c6dc2d..5f3fdfdb14c7 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1951,9 +1951,11 @@ static void rv_task_fork(struct task_struct *p)
static bool need_futex_hash_allocate_default(u64 clone_flags)
{
- if ((clone_flags & (CLONE_THREAD | CLONE_VM)) != (CLONE_THREAD | CLONE_VM))
- return false;
- return true;
+ /*
+ * Allocate a default futex hash for any sibling that will
+ * share the parent's mm, except vfork.
+ */
+ return (clone_flags & (CLONE_VM | CLONE_VFORK)) == CLONE_VM;
}
/*
@@ -2380,10 +2382,6 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
if (retval)
goto bad_fork_cancel_cgroup;
- /*
- * Allocate a default futex hash for the user process once the first
- * thread spawns.
- */
if (need_futex_hash_allocate_default(clone_flags)) {
retval = futex_hash_allocate_default();
if (retval)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] futex: Drop CLONE_THREAD requirement for private default hash alloc
2026-05-02 15:57 [PATCH] futex: Drop CLONE_THREAD requirement for private default hash alloc Mohamed Ayman
@ 2026-05-02 17:24 ` Andrew Morton
2026-05-02 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2026-05-02 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mohamed Ayman
Cc: Kees Cook, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli,
Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall,
Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, K Prateek Nayak,
David Hildenbrand, Lorenzo Stoakes, Liam R. Howlett,
Vlastimil Babka, Mike Rapoport, Suren Baghdasaryan, Michal Hocko,
Borislav Petkov (AMD),
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, open list:EXEC & BINFMT API, ELF,
open list:SCHEDULER, Davidlohr Bueso, Yiming Qian,
Linus Torvalds, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On Sat, 2 May 2026 18:57:29 +0300 Mohamed Ayman <mohamedaymanworkspace@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
>
> Currently need_futex_hash_allocate_default() depends on strict pthread
> semantics, abusing CLONE_THREAD. This breaks the non-concurrency
> assumptions when doing the mm->futex_ref pcpu allocations, leading to
> bugs[0] when sharing the mm in other ways; ie:
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in futex_hash_put
>
> ... where the +1 bias can end up on a percpu counter that mm->futex_ref
> no longer points at.
>
> Loosen the check to cover any CLONE_VM clone, except vfork(). Excluding
> vfork keeps the existing paths untouched (no overhead), and we can't
> race in the first place: either the parent is suspended and the child
> runs alone, or mm->futex_ref is already allocated from an earlier
> CLONE_VM.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_bE8LsmCQ-FAtYDuwbJhOkt9p2wwYQwAbMh=PifC=VsiBM6A@mail.gmail.com/ [0]
> Fixes: d9b05321e21e ("futex: Move futex_hash_free() back to __mmput()")
> Reported-by: Yiming Qian <yimingqian591@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
I hate to get all bureaucratic, but....
Given what you've sent and from my reading of the security@ and
linux-kernel@ lists,
- I can't find a patch from Davidlohr which looks like this one - I
can't figure out where you got that from.
- I can't find any code from Linus which would lead to the addition of
his Signed-off-by:. I don't know where you got that from either.
- Let's cc the author of the Fixes target, Sebastian?
I'd like to have this metadata tightened up, please - so a reader of
this patch can understand who did & said what and when and why.
Thanks.
> kernel/fork.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index f1ad69c6dc2d..5f3fdfdb14c7 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -1951,9 +1951,11 @@ static void rv_task_fork(struct task_struct *p)
>
> static bool need_futex_hash_allocate_default(u64 clone_flags)
> {
> - if ((clone_flags & (CLONE_THREAD | CLONE_VM)) != (CLONE_THREAD | CLONE_VM))
> - return false;
> - return true;
> + /*
> + * Allocate a default futex hash for any sibling that will
> + * share the parent's mm, except vfork.
> + */
> + return (clone_flags & (CLONE_VM | CLONE_VFORK)) == CLONE_VM;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2380,10 +2382,6 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
> if (retval)
> goto bad_fork_cancel_cgroup;
>
> - /*
> - * Allocate a default futex hash for the user process once the first
> - * thread spawns.
> - */
> if (need_futex_hash_allocate_default(clone_flags)) {
> retval = futex_hash_allocate_default();
> if (retval)
> --
> 2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] futex: Drop CLONE_THREAD requirement for private default hash alloc
2026-05-02 17:24 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2026-05-02 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2026-05-02 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Mohamed Ayman, Kees Cook, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra,
Juri Lelli, Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt,
Ben Segall, Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, K Prateek Nayak,
David Hildenbrand, Lorenzo Stoakes, Liam R. Howlett,
Vlastimil Babka, Mike Rapoport, Suren Baghdasaryan, Michal Hocko,
Borislav Petkov (AMD),
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, open list:EXEC & BINFMT API, ELF,
open list:SCHEDULER, Davidlohr Bueso, Yiming Qian
On Sat, 2 May 2026 at 10:24, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> - I can't find a patch from Davidlohr which looks like this one - I
> can't figure out where you got that from.
>
> - I can't find any code from Linus which would lead to the addition of
> his Signed-off-by:. I don't know where you got that from either.
It looks to be just a re-send from the kernel git tree (commit
ee9dce44362b: "futex: Drop CLONE_THREAD requirement for private
default hash alloc").
People who use git-send-email by mistalke often end up re-sending
other peoples patches.
And that commit came from
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260501194123.948643-1-dave@stgolabs.net/
except I fixed the "from an earlier CLONE_THREAD" in the commit
message to be about CLONE_VM when I applied it (as per the thread
there)
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] futex: Drop CLONE_THREAD requirement for private default hash alloc
2026-05-01 20:05 ` Davidlohr Bueso
@ 2026-05-01 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2026-05-01 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: tglx, mingo, peterz, bigeasy, yimingqian591, dvhart, andrealmeid,
linux-kernel
On Fri, 1 May 2026 at 13:05, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 01 May 2026, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >That "earlier CLONE_THREAD" should presumably be "earlier CLONE_VM", no?
>
> yes :)
I ended up applying this directly since I was looking at it anyway and
it felt like an obvious fix.
Famous last words.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] futex: Drop CLONE_THREAD requirement for private default hash alloc
2026-05-01 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2026-05-01 20:05 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2026-05-01 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Davidlohr Bueso @ 2026-05-01 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: tglx, mingo, peterz, bigeasy, yimingqian591, dvhart, andrealmeid,
linux-kernel
On Fri, 01 May 2026, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>On Fri, 1 May 2026 at 12:41, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote:
>>
>> Loosen the check to cover any CLONE_VM clone, except vfork(). Excluding
>> vfork keeps the existing paths untouched (no overhead), and we can't
>> race in the first place: either the parent is suspended and the child runs
>> alone, or mm->futex_ref is already allocated from an earlier CLONE_THREAD.
>
>That "earlier CLONE_THREAD" should presumably be "earlier CLONE_VM", no?
yes :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] futex: Drop CLONE_THREAD requirement for private default hash alloc
2026-05-01 19:41 Davidlohr Bueso
@ 2026-05-01 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-05-01 20:05 ` Davidlohr Bueso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2026-05-01 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Davidlohr Bueso
Cc: tglx, mingo, peterz, bigeasy, yimingqian591, dvhart, andrealmeid,
linux-kernel
On Fri, 1 May 2026 at 12:41, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote:
>
> Loosen the check to cover any CLONE_VM clone, except vfork(). Excluding
> vfork keeps the existing paths untouched (no overhead), and we can't
> race in the first place: either the parent is suspended and the child runs
> alone, or mm->futex_ref is already allocated from an earlier CLONE_THREAD.
That "earlier CLONE_THREAD" should presumably be "earlier CLONE_VM", no?
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] futex: Drop CLONE_THREAD requirement for private default hash alloc
@ 2026-05-01 19:41 Davidlohr Bueso
2026-05-01 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Davidlohr Bueso @ 2026-05-01 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: torvalds, tglx, mingo, peterz
Cc: bigeasy, yimingqian591, dvhart, andrealmeid, dave, linux-kernel
Currently need_futex_hash_allocate_default() depends on strict
pthread semantics, abusing CLONE_THREAD. This breaks the
non-concurrency assumptions when doing the mm->futex_ref pcpu
allocations, leading to bugs[0] when sharing the mm in other ways;
ie:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in futex_hash_put
... where the +1 bias can end up on a percpu counter that mm->futex_ref
no longer points at.
Loosen the check to cover any CLONE_VM clone, except vfork(). Excluding
vfork keeps the existing paths untouched (no overhead), and we can't
race in the first place: either the parent is suspended and the child runs
alone, or mm->futex_ref is already allocated from an earlier CLONE_THREAD.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_bE8LsmCQ-FAtYDuwbJhOkt9p2wwYQwAbMh=PifC=VsiBM6A@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: d9b05321e21e ("futex: Move futex_hash_free() back to __mmput()")
Reported-by: Yiming Qian <yimingqian591@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
---
kernel/fork.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index f1ad69c6dc2d..5f3fdfdb14c7 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1951,9 +1951,11 @@ static void rv_task_fork(struct task_struct *p)
static bool need_futex_hash_allocate_default(u64 clone_flags)
{
- if ((clone_flags & (CLONE_THREAD | CLONE_VM)) != (CLONE_THREAD | CLONE_VM))
- return false;
- return true;
+ /*
+ * Allocate a default futex hash for any sibling that will
+ * share the parent's mm, except vfork.
+ */
+ return (clone_flags & (CLONE_VM | CLONE_VFORK)) == CLONE_VM;
}
/*
@@ -2380,10 +2382,6 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
if (retval)
goto bad_fork_cancel_cgroup;
- /*
- * Allocate a default futex hash for the user process once the first
- * thread spawns.
- */
if (need_futex_hash_allocate_default(clone_flags)) {
retval = futex_hash_allocate_default();
if (retval)
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-02 17:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-02 15:57 [PATCH] futex: Drop CLONE_THREAD requirement for private default hash alloc Mohamed Ayman
2026-05-02 17:24 ` Andrew Morton
2026-05-02 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-05-01 19:41 Davidlohr Bueso
2026-05-01 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-05-01 20:05 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2026-05-01 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®