* [PATCH] ceph: fix OOB read in decode_lockers() via missing bounds check
@ 2026-05-23 1:46 Pavitra Jha
2026-05-26 19:04 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavitra Jha @ 2026-05-23 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: idryomov; +Cc: amarkuze, slava, ceph-devel, linux-kernel, stable, Pavitra Jha
ceph_start_decoding() accepts struct_len=0 as valid:
ceph_decode_need(p, end, 0, bad) always passes. When a malicious or
compromised OSD sends a cls_lock_get_info_reply with struct_len=0,
ceph_start_decoding() returns success with p == end, leaving zero
bytes guaranteed for subsequent reads.
The immediately following bare ceph_decode_32(p) in decode_lockers()
has no preceding bounds check. With p == end this is a 4-byte read
past the validated buffer boundary. The garbage value is then passed
to kzalloc_objs() as the locker count.
The sibling function decode_watchers() in osd_client.c already uses
the safe variant ceph_decode_32_safe() after its own
ceph_start_decoding() call. decode_lockers() is the only site using
the bare variant, confirming an oversight.
Fix by replacing ceph_decode_32(p) with ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end,
*num_lockers, err_inval), adding a new err_inval label that returns
-EINVAL directly without attempting to free an uninitialized lockers
pointer.
KASAN report (kernel 7.0.0-rc7, QEMU/x86_64, KASLR disabled):
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ceph_oob3_init+0x251/0xff0 [ceph_oob3_poc]
Read of size 4 at addr ffff88800a29b76e by task insmod/58
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 58 Comm: insmod Tainted: G O 7.0.0-rc7-g9c2abf69da83-dirty #15 PREEMPT(lazy)
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-debian-1.17.0-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x4d/0x70
print_report+0x170/0x4f3
kasan_report+0xda/0x110
ceph_oob3_init+0x251/0xff0 [ceph_oob3_poc]
do_one_initcall+0x9a/0x3a0
do_init_module+0x27c/0x790
load_module+0x4a9a/0x6350
init_module_from_file+0x15c/0x180
idempotent_init_module+0x21f/0x750
__x64_sys_finit_module+0xba/0x120
do_syscall_64+0xe2/0x570
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Allocated by task 58:
kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50
kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
__kasan_kmalloc+0x7f/0x90
ceph_oob3_init+0x4d/0xff0 [ceph_oob3_poc]
do_one_initcall+0x9a/0x3a0
do_init_module+0x27c/0x790
load_module+0x4a9a/0x6350
init_module_from_file+0x15c/0x180
idempotent_init_module+0x21f/0x750
__x64_sys_finit_module+0xba/0x120
do_syscall_64+0xe2/0x570
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88800a29a000
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8k of size 8192
The buggy address is located 5998 bytes inside of
allocated 6000-byte region [ffff88800a29a000, ffff88800a29b770)
Memory state around the buggy address:
ffff88800a29b600: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
ffff88800a29b680: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>ffff88800a29b700: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc
^
ffff88800a29b780: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
==================================================================
num_lockers=0xccccaaaa (OOB garbage from KASAN redzone)
Attacker model: a malicious or compromised OSD in a multi-tenant Ceph
deployment can trigger this against any kernel client that issues the
lock.get_info class method (e.g. during RBD exclusive lock acquisition)
without any further privileges beyond OSD session establishment.
Fixes: d4ed4a530562 ("libceph: support for lock.lock_info")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Pavitra Jha <jhapavitra98@gmail.com>
---
net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c b/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c
index c6956f1df..78276273c 100644
--- a/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c
+++ b/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static int decode_lockers(void **p, void *end, u8 *type, char **tag,
if (ret)
return ret;
- *num_lockers = ceph_decode_32(p);
+ ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end, *num_lockers, err_inval);
*lockers = kzalloc_objs(**lockers, *num_lockers, GFP_NOIO);
if (!*lockers)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -320,6 +320,8 @@ static int decode_lockers(void **p, void *end, u8 *type, char **tag,
*tag = s;
return 0;
+err_inval:
+ return -EINVAL;
err_free_lockers:
ceph_free_lockers(*lockers, *num_lockers);
return ret;
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ceph: fix OOB read in decode_lockers() via missing bounds check 2026-05-23 1:46 [PATCH] ceph: fix OOB read in decode_lockers() via missing bounds check Pavitra Jha @ 2026-05-26 19:04 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko 2026-05-28 13:25 ` [PATCH v2] ceph: fix bare ceph_decode_8 OOB in decode_lockers() Pavitra Jha 2026-05-28 14:36 ` [PATCH] ceph: fix OOB read in decode_lockers() via missing bounds check Pavitra Jha 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Viacheslav Dubeyko @ 2026-05-26 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: idryomov, jhapavitra98 Cc: stable, Alex Markuze, slava, linux-kernel, ceph-devel On Fri, 2026-05-22 at 21:46 -0400, Pavitra Jha wrote: > ceph_start_decoding() accepts struct_len=0 as valid: > ceph_decode_need(p, end, 0, bad) always passes. When a malicious or > compromised OSD sends a cls_lock_get_info_reply with struct_len=0, > ceph_start_decoding() returns success with p == end, leaving zero > bytes guaranteed for subsequent reads. > > The immediately following bare ceph_decode_32(p) in decode_lockers() > has no preceding bounds check. With p == end this is a 4-byte read > past the validated buffer boundary. The garbage value is then passed > to kzalloc_objs() as the locker count. > > The sibling function decode_watchers() in osd_client.c already uses > the safe variant ceph_decode_32_safe() after its own > ceph_start_decoding() call. decode_lockers() is the only site using > the bare variant, confirming an oversight. > > Fix by replacing ceph_decode_32(p) with ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end, > *num_lockers, err_inval), adding a new err_inval label that returns > -EINVAL directly without attempting to free an uninitialized lockers > pointer. > > KASAN report (kernel 7.0.0-rc7, QEMU/x86_64, KASLR disabled): > ================================================================== > BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ceph_oob3_init+0x251/0xff0 [ceph_oob3_poc] > Read of size 4 at addr ffff88800a29b76e by task insmod/58 > > CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 58 Comm: insmod Tainted: G O 7.0.0-rc7-g9c2abf69da83-dirty #15 PREEMPT(lazy) > Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-debian-1.17.0-1 04/01/2014 > Call Trace: > <TASK> > dump_stack_lvl+0x4d/0x70 > print_report+0x170/0x4f3 > kasan_report+0xda/0x110 > ceph_oob3_init+0x251/0xff0 [ceph_oob3_poc] > do_one_initcall+0x9a/0x3a0 > do_init_module+0x27c/0x790 > load_module+0x4a9a/0x6350 > init_module_from_file+0x15c/0x180 > idempotent_init_module+0x21f/0x750 > __x64_sys_finit_module+0xba/0x120 > do_syscall_64+0xe2/0x570 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f > > Allocated by task 58: > kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50 > kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 > __kasan_kmalloc+0x7f/0x90 > ceph_oob3_init+0x4d/0xff0 [ceph_oob3_poc] > do_one_initcall+0x9a/0x3a0 > do_init_module+0x27c/0x790 > load_module+0x4a9a/0x6350 > init_module_from_file+0x15c/0x180 > idempotent_init_module+0x21f/0x750 > __x64_sys_finit_module+0xba/0x120 > do_syscall_64+0xe2/0x570 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f > > The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88800a29a000 > which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8k of size 8192 > The buggy address is located 5998 bytes inside of > allocated 6000-byte region [ffff88800a29a000, ffff88800a29b770) > > Memory state around the buggy address: > ffff88800a29b600: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > ffff88800a29b680: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > >ffff88800a29b700: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc > ^ > ffff88800a29b780: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc > ================================================================== > > num_lockers=0xccccaaaa (OOB garbage from KASAN redzone) > > Attacker model: a malicious or compromised OSD in a multi-tenant Ceph > deployment can trigger this against any kernel client that issues the > lock.get_info class method (e.g. during RBD exclusive lock acquisition) > without any further privileges beyond OSD session establishment. > > Fixes: d4ed4a530562 ("libceph: support for lock.lock_info") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Pavitra Jha <jhapavitra98@gmail.com> > --- > net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c b/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c > index c6956f1df..78276273c 100644 > --- a/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c > +++ b/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c > @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static int decode_lockers(void **p, void *end, u8 *type, char **tag, As far as I can see, decode_locker() has the same issue. Have you sent the patch for this? > if (ret) > return ret; > > - *num_lockers = ceph_decode_32(p); > + ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end, *num_lockers, err_inval); > *lockers = kzalloc_objs(**lockers, *num_lockers, GFP_NOIO); > if (!*lockers) > return -ENOMEM; > @@ -320,6 +320,8 @@ static int decode_lockers(void **p, void *end, u8 *type, char **tag, > *tag = s; > return 0; > > +err_inval: > + return -EINVAL; > err_free_lockers: > ceph_free_lockers(*lockers, *num_lockers); > return ret; I am still not completely sure about -EINVAL here too. Maybe, -ENOMEM could be more correct. What about this [1]? *type = ceph_decode_8(p); Should we rework it too? Thanks, Slava. [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1-rc4/source/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c#L313 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] ceph: fix bare ceph_decode_8 OOB in decode_lockers() 2026-05-26 19:04 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko @ 2026-05-28 13:25 ` Pavitra Jha 2026-05-28 18:06 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko 2026-05-30 17:46 ` Dan Carpenter 2026-05-28 14:36 ` [PATCH] ceph: fix OOB read in decode_lockers() via missing bounds check Pavitra Jha 1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavitra Jha @ 2026-05-28 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: idryomov Cc: Slava.Dubeyko, amarkuze, ceph-devel, linux-kernel, stable, Pavitra Jha decode_lockers() in cls_lock_client.c contains a bare ceph_decode_8(p) call after the decode_locker() loop that has no preceding bounds check. If a malicious or compromised OSD sends a cls_lock_get_info_reply where num_lockers is crafted such that the decode_locker() loop advances p exactly to end (or if num_lockers=0 and p is already at end after ceph_start_decoding() accepts struct_len=0), the subsequent bare ceph_decode_8(p) reads one byte past the validated buffer boundary. The result is passed directly into *type, which is subsequently used as a lock type discriminator by callers. An OSD-controlled one-byte OOB read at this position gives an attacker influence over the lock type field with no further preconditions. The safe variant ceph_decode_8_safe() already exists and is used consistently throughout the codebase. This site is the only remaining bare ceph_decode_8() in the decode_lockers() post-loop path. The goto target is err_free_lockers (not err_inval) because *lockers is already allocated at this point and must be freed on any decode failure. v1 of this series fixed the bare ceph_decode_32() before kzalloc_objs() and added the err_inval label. This v2 addresses the second bare decode identified by Viacheslav Dubeyko's review. Regarding the -EINVAL choice (raised in review): -EINVAL is correct for the err_inval path. The failure is structural malformation of OSD-supplied data, not a memory shortage. -ENOMEM would misrepresent the failure class to callers and to stable@ backporters triaging error paths. Attacker model: a malicious or compromised OSD in a multi-tenant Ceph deployment can trigger this against any kernel client that issues the lock.get_info class method (e.g. during RBD exclusive lock acquisition) without any further privileges beyond OSD session establishment. Fixes: d4ed4a530562 ("libceph: support for lock.lock_info") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Pavitra Jha <jhapavitra98@gmail.com> --- v2: Replace bare *type = ceph_decode_8(p) with ceph_decode_8_safe(), goto err_free_lockers to correctly free *lockers on failure. Address Viacheslav Dubeyko's review question about this site and clarify -EINVAL rationale. --- net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c b/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c index 4f27b3d15..c9183a348 100644 --- a/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c +++ b/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static int decode_lockers(void **p, void *end, u8 *type, char **tag, goto err_free_lockers; } - *type = ceph_decode_8(p); + ceph_decode_8_safe(p, end, *type, err_free_lockers); s = ceph_extract_encoded_string(p, end, NULL, GFP_NOIO); if (IS_ERR(s)) { ret = PTR_ERR(s); -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: fix bare ceph_decode_8 OOB in decode_lockers() 2026-05-28 13:25 ` [PATCH v2] ceph: fix bare ceph_decode_8 OOB in decode_lockers() Pavitra Jha @ 2026-05-28 18:06 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko 2026-05-30 17:46 ` Dan Carpenter 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Viacheslav Dubeyko @ 2026-05-28 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: idryomov, jhapavitra98; +Cc: Alex Markuze, ceph-devel, linux-kernel, stable On Thu, 2026-05-28 at 09:25 -0400, Pavitra Jha wrote: > decode_lockers() in cls_lock_client.c contains a bare ceph_decode_8(p) > call after the decode_locker() loop that has no preceding bounds check. > > If a malicious or compromised OSD sends a cls_lock_get_info_reply where > num_lockers is crafted such that the decode_locker() loop advances p > exactly to end (or if num_lockers=0 and p is already at end after > ceph_start_decoding() accepts struct_len=0), the subsequent bare > ceph_decode_8(p) reads one byte past the validated buffer boundary. > > The result is passed directly into *type, which is subsequently used as > a lock type discriminator by callers. An OSD-controlled one-byte OOB > read at this position gives an attacker influence over the lock type > field with no further preconditions. > > The safe variant ceph_decode_8_safe() already exists and is used > consistently throughout the codebase. This site is the only remaining > bare ceph_decode_8() in the decode_lockers() post-loop path. > > The goto target is err_free_lockers (not err_inval) because *lockers is > already allocated at this point and must be freed on any decode failure. > > v1 of this series fixed the bare ceph_decode_32() before kzalloc_objs() > and added the err_inval label. This v2 addresses the second bare decode > identified by Viacheslav Dubeyko's review. > > Regarding the -EINVAL choice (raised in review): -EINVAL is correct for > the err_inval path. The failure is structural malformation of OSD-supplied > data, not a memory shortage. -ENOMEM would misrepresent the failure class > to callers and to stable@ backporters triaging error paths. > > Attacker model: a malicious or compromised OSD in a multi-tenant Ceph > deployment can trigger this against any kernel client that issues the > lock.get_info class method (e.g. during RBD exclusive lock acquisition) > without any further privileges beyond OSD session establishment. > > Fixes: d4ed4a530562 ("libceph: support for lock.lock_info") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Pavitra Jha <jhapavitra98@gmail.com> > --- > v2: Replace bare *type = ceph_decode_8(p) with ceph_decode_8_safe(), > goto err_free_lockers to correctly free *lockers on failure. > Address Viacheslav Dubeyko's review question about this site and > clarify -EINVAL rationale. > --- > net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c b/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c > index 4f27b3d15..c9183a348 100644 > --- a/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c > +++ b/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c > @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static int decode_lockers(void **p, void *end, u8 *type, char **tag, > goto err_free_lockers; > } > > - *type = ceph_decode_8(p); > + ceph_decode_8_safe(p, end, *type, err_free_lockers); > s = ceph_extract_encoded_string(p, end, NULL, GFP_NOIO); > if (IS_ERR(s)) { > ret = PTR_ERR(s); Is it correct patch? Because, initial patch contained this: > - *num_lockers = ceph_decode_32(p); > + ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end, *num_lockers, err_inval); > *lockers = kzalloc_objs(**lockers, *num_lockers, GFP_NOIO); And I expected to see both modifications. I am slightly confused, frankly speaking. Thanks, Slava. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: fix bare ceph_decode_8 OOB in decode_lockers() 2026-05-28 13:25 ` [PATCH v2] ceph: fix bare ceph_decode_8 OOB in decode_lockers() Pavitra Jha 2026-05-28 18:06 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko @ 2026-05-30 17:46 ` Dan Carpenter 2026-06-02 4:17 ` [PATCH v3] ceph: fix two unsafe bare decodes " Pavitra Jha 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Dan Carpenter @ 2026-05-30 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: oe-kbuild, Pavitra Jha, idryomov Cc: lkp, oe-kbuild-all, Slava.Dubeyko, amarkuze, ceph-devel, linux-kernel, stable, Pavitra Jha Hi Pavitra, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Pavitra-Jha/ceph-fix-bare-ceph_decode_8-OOB-in-decode_lockers/20260528-212749 base: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-client.git testing patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260528132521.843004-1-jhapavitra98%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v2] ceph: fix bare ceph_decode_8 OOB in decode_lockers() config: um-randconfig-r073-20260530 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260531/202605310022.LGyGb8eD-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 smatch: v0.5.0-9185-gbcc58b9c If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202605310022.LGyGb8eD-lkp@intel.com/ smatch warnings: net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c:313 decode_lockers() warn: missing error code 'ret' vim +/ret +313 net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 288 static int decode_lockers(void **p, void *end, u8 *type, char **tag, d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 289 struct ceph_locker **lockers, u32 *num_lockers) d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 290 { d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 291 u8 struct_v; d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 292 u32 struct_len; d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 293 char *s; d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 294 int i; d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 295 int ret; d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 296 d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 297 ret = ceph_start_decoding(p, end, 1, "cls_lock_get_info_reply", d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 298 &struct_v, &struct_len); d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 299 if (ret) d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 300 return ret; d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 301 d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 302 *num_lockers = ceph_decode_32(p); 69050f8d6d075d Kees Cook 2026-02-20 303 *lockers = kzalloc_objs(**lockers, *num_lockers, GFP_NOIO); d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 304 if (!*lockers) d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 305 return -ENOMEM; d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 306 d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 307 for (i = 0; i < *num_lockers; i++) { d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 308 ret = decode_locker(p, end, *lockers + i); d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 309 if (ret) d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 310 goto err_free_lockers; d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 311 } d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 312 cff58e4599d8e1 Pavitra Jha 2026-05-28 @313 ceph_decode_8_safe(p, end, *type, err_free_lockers); This macro has a goto err_free_lockers but the error code isn't set. d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 314 s = ceph_extract_encoded_string(p, end, NULL, GFP_NOIO); d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 315 if (IS_ERR(s)) { d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 316 ret = PTR_ERR(s); d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 317 goto err_free_lockers; d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 318 } d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 319 d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 320 *tag = s; d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 321 return 0; d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 322 d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 323 err_free_lockers: d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 324 ceph_free_lockers(*lockers, *num_lockers); d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 325 return ret; d4ed4a53056288 Douglas Fuller 2015-06-29 326 } -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] ceph: fix two unsafe bare decodes in decode_lockers() 2026-05-30 17:46 ` Dan Carpenter @ 2026-06-02 4:17 ` Pavitra Jha 2026-06-02 16:46 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavitra Jha @ 2026-06-02 4:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: idryomov Cc: Slava.Dubeyko, amarkuze, ceph-devel, linux-kernel, stable, Pavitra Jha decode_lockers() in cls_lock_client.c contains two bare decode operations that allow a malicious or compromised OSD to trigger slab-out-of-bounds reads: 1. ceph_decode_32(p) at the num_lockers field has no preceding bounds check. ceph_start_decoding() accepts struct_len=0 as valid -- the internal ceph_decode_need(p, end, 0, bad) always passes -- so when an OSD sends struct_len=0, ceph_start_decoding() returns success with p == end. The immediately following bare ceph_decode_32(p) then reads 4 bytes past the validated buffer boundary. The garbage value is passed directly to kzalloc_objs() as the locker count. The sibling function decode_watchers() in osd_client.c already uses ceph_decode_32_safe() after its own ceph_start_decoding() call. decode_lockers() was the only site using the bare variant. 2. ceph_decode_8(p) after the decode_locker() loop has no preceding bounds check. If an OSD crafts num_lockers such that the loop advances p exactly to end, the subsequent bare ceph_decode_8(p) reads one byte past the validated buffer boundary. The result is passed directly into *type, which is used as a lock type discriminator by callers, giving an OSD-controlled one-byte OOB read with direct influence over the lock type field. Fix both by replacing bare operations with their safe variants: ceph_decode_32(p) -> ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end, *num_lockers, err_inval) ceph_decode_8(p) -> ceph_decode_8_safe(p, end, *type, err_free_lockers) The goto targets differ intentionally: err_inval: is a new label returning -EINVAL directly. It is used for the pre-allocation failure path where *lockers is not yet allocated and must not be passed to ceph_free_lockers(). err_free_lockers: is the existing label. It is used for the post-allocation failure path where *lockers is allocated and must be freed. ret is set to -EINVAL before ceph_decode_8_safe() so that err_free_lockers returns the correct error code on bounds violation. Without this, err_free_lockers would return a stale ret value (0 from the successful decode_locker() loop), silently swallowing the error. -EINVAL is correct for both failure paths. The data received from the OSD is structurally malformed. -ENOMEM would misrepresent the failure class to callers and to stable@ backporters triaging error paths. KASAN report for bug 1 (kernel 7.0.0-rc7, QEMU/x86_64, KASLR disabled): ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ceph_oob3_init+0x251/0xff0 [ceph_oob3_poc] Read of size 4 at addr ffff88800a29b76e by task insmod/58 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 58 Comm: insmod Tainted: G O 7.0.0-rc7-g9c2abf69da83-dirty #15 PREEMPT(lazy) Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-debian-1.17.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x4d/0x70 print_report+0x170/0x4f3 kasan_report+0xda/0x110 ceph_oob3_init+0x251/0xff0 [ceph_oob3_poc] do_one_initcall+0x9a/0x3a0 do_init_module+0x27c/0x790 load_module+0x4a9a/0x6350 init_module_from_file+0x15c/0x180 idempotent_init_module+0x21f/0x750 __x64_sys_finit_module+0xba/0x120 do_syscall_64+0xe2/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Allocated by task 58: kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0x7f/0x90 ceph_oob3_init+0x4d/0xff0 [ceph_oob3_poc] do_one_initcall+0x9a/0x3a0 do_init_module+0x27c/0x790 load_module+0x4a9a/0x6350 init_module_from_file+0x15c/0x180 idempotent_init_module+0x21f/0x750 __x64_sys_finit_module+0xba/0x120 do_syscall_64+0xe2/0x570 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88800a29a000 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8k of size 8192 The buggy address is located 5998 bytes inside of allocated 6000-byte region [ffff88800a29a000, ffff88800a29b770) Memory state around the buggy address: ffff88800a29b600: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff88800a29b680: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >ffff88800a29b700: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc ^ ffff88800a29b780: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ================================================================== num_lockers=0xccccaaaa (OOB garbage from KASAN redzone) Bug 2 (ceph_decode_8) follows from the identical precondition. A dedicated PoC is available on request. Attacker model: a malicious or compromised OSD in a multi-tenant Ceph deployment can trigger this against any kernel client that issues the lock.get_info class method (e.g. during RBD exclusive lock acquisition) without any further privileges beyond OSD session establishment. Fixes: d4ed4a530562 ("libceph: support for lock.lock_info") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Pavitra Jha <jhapavitra98@gmail.com> --- v3: Combine both fixes (ceph_decode_32 and ceph_decode_8) into a single patch per Viacheslav Dubeyko's review. Set ret = -EINVAL before ceph_decode_8_safe() so err_free_lockers returns the correct error code, not stale ret (caught by Dan Carpenter / smatch). Clarify err_inval vs err_free_lockers goto selection rationale and -EINVAL justification. --- net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c b/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c index c6956f1df..4e6a6d3e4 100644 --- a/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c +++ b/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static int decode_lockers(void **p, void *end, u8 *type, char **tag, if (ret) return ret; - *num_lockers = ceph_decode_32(p); + ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end, *num_lockers, err_inval); *lockers = kzalloc_objs(**lockers, *num_lockers, GFP_NOIO); if (!*lockers) return -ENOMEM; @@ -310,7 +310,8 @@ static int decode_lockers(void **p, void *end, u8 *type, char **tag, goto err_free_lockers; } - *type = ceph_decode_8(p); + ret = -EINVAL; + ceph_decode_8_safe(p, end, *type, err_free_lockers); s = ceph_extract_encoded_string(p, end, NULL, GFP_NOIO); if (IS_ERR(s)) { ret = PTR_ERR(s); @@ -320,6 +321,8 @@ static int decode_lockers(void **p, void *end, u8 *type, char **tag, *tag = s; return 0; +err_inval: + return -EINVAL; err_free_lockers: ceph_free_lockers(*lockers, *num_lockers); return ret; -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] ceph: fix two unsafe bare decodes in decode_lockers() 2026-06-02 4:17 ` [PATCH v3] ceph: fix two unsafe bare decodes " Pavitra Jha @ 2026-06-02 16:46 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Viacheslav Dubeyko @ 2026-06-02 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavitra Jha, idryomov Cc: Slava.Dubeyko, amarkuze, ceph-devel, linux-kernel, stable On Tue, 2026-06-02 at 00:17 -0400, Pavitra Jha wrote: > decode_lockers() in cls_lock_client.c contains two bare decode > operations > that allow a malicious or compromised OSD to trigger slab-out-of- > bounds > reads: > > 1. ceph_decode_32(p) at the num_lockers field has no preceding bounds > check. ceph_start_decoding() accepts struct_len=0 as valid -- the > internal ceph_decode_need(p, end, 0, bad) always passes -- so when > an > OSD sends struct_len=0, ceph_start_decoding() returns success with > p == end. The immediately following bare ceph_decode_32(p) then > reads > 4 bytes past the validated buffer boundary. The garbage value is > passed directly to kzalloc_objs() as the locker count. > > The sibling function decode_watchers() in osd_client.c already > uses > ceph_decode_32_safe() after its own ceph_start_decoding() call. > decode_lockers() was the only site using the bare variant. > > 2. ceph_decode_8(p) after the decode_locker() loop has no preceding > bounds check. If an OSD crafts num_lockers such that the loop > advances p exactly to end, the subsequent bare ceph_decode_8(p) > reads > one byte past the validated buffer boundary. The result is passed > directly into *type, which is used as a lock type discriminator by > callers, giving an OSD-controlled one-byte OOB read with direct > influence over the lock type field. > > Fix both by replacing bare operations with their safe variants: > ceph_decode_32(p) -> ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end, *num_lockers, > err_inval) > ceph_decode_8(p) -> ceph_decode_8_safe(p, end, *type, > err_free_lockers) > > The goto targets differ intentionally: > err_inval: is a new label returning -EINVAL directly. It is used > for > the pre-allocation failure path where *lockers is not yet allocated > and must not be passed to ceph_free_lockers(). > > err_free_lockers: is the existing label. It is used for the > post-allocation failure path where *lockers is allocated and must > be freed. > > ret is set to -EINVAL before ceph_decode_8_safe() so that > err_free_lockers returns the correct error code on bounds violation. > Without this, err_free_lockers would return a stale ret value (0 from > the successful decode_locker() loop), silently swallowing the error. > > -EINVAL is correct for both failure paths. The data received from the > OSD is structurally malformed. -ENOMEM would misrepresent the failure > class to callers and to stable@ backporters triaging error paths. > > KASAN report for bug 1 (kernel 7.0.0-rc7, QEMU/x86_64, KASLR > disabled): > ================================================================== > BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ceph_oob3_init+0x251/0xff0 > [ceph_oob3_poc] > Read of size 4 at addr ffff88800a29b76e by task insmod/58 > > CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 58 Comm: insmod Tainted: G O > 7.0.0-rc7-g9c2abf69da83-dirty #15 PREEMPT(lazy) > Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0- > debian-1.17.0-1 04/01/2014 > Call Trace: > <TASK> > dump_stack_lvl+0x4d/0x70 > print_report+0x170/0x4f3 > kasan_report+0xda/0x110 > ceph_oob3_init+0x251/0xff0 [ceph_oob3_poc] > do_one_initcall+0x9a/0x3a0 > do_init_module+0x27c/0x790 > load_module+0x4a9a/0x6350 > init_module_from_file+0x15c/0x180 > idempotent_init_module+0x21f/0x750 > __x64_sys_finit_module+0xba/0x120 > do_syscall_64+0xe2/0x570 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f > > Allocated by task 58: > kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50 > kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 > __kasan_kmalloc+0x7f/0x90 > ceph_oob3_init+0x4d/0xff0 [ceph_oob3_poc] > do_one_initcall+0x9a/0x3a0 > do_init_module+0x27c/0x790 > load_module+0x4a9a/0x6350 > init_module_from_file+0x15c/0x180 > idempotent_init_module+0x21f/0x750 > __x64_sys_finit_module+0xba/0x120 > do_syscall_64+0xe2/0x570 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f > > The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88800a29a000 > which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8k of size 8192 > The buggy address is located 5998 bytes inside of > allocated 6000-byte region [ffff88800a29a000, ffff88800a29b770) > > Memory state around the buggy address: > ffff88800a29b600: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > ffff88800a29b680: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > >ffff88800a29b700: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc > ^ > ffff88800a29b780: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc > ================================================================== > > num_lockers=0xccccaaaa (OOB garbage from KASAN redzone) > > Bug 2 (ceph_decode_8) follows from the identical precondition. A > dedicated PoC is available on request. > > Attacker model: a malicious or compromised OSD in a multi-tenant Ceph > deployment can trigger this against any kernel client that issues the > lock.get_info class method (e.g. during RBD exclusive lock > acquisition) > without any further privileges beyond OSD session establishment. > > Fixes: d4ed4a530562 ("libceph: support for lock.lock_info") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Pavitra Jha <jhapavitra98@gmail.com> > --- > v3: Combine both fixes (ceph_decode_32 and ceph_decode_8) into a > single > patch per Viacheslav Dubeyko's review. Set ret = -EINVAL before > ceph_decode_8_safe() so err_free_lockers returns the correct > error > code, not stale ret (caught by Dan Carpenter / smatch). Clarify > err_inval vs err_free_lockers goto selection rationale and > -EINVAL justification. > --- > net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c b/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c > index c6956f1df..4e6a6d3e4 100644 > --- a/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c > +++ b/net/ceph/cls_lock_client.c > @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static int decode_lockers(void **p, void *end, u8 > *type, char **tag, > if (ret) > return ret; > > - *num_lockers = ceph_decode_32(p); > + ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end, *num_lockers, err_inval); > *lockers = kzalloc_objs(**lockers, *num_lockers, GFP_NOIO); > if (!*lockers) > return -ENOMEM; > @@ -310,7 +310,8 @@ static int decode_lockers(void **p, void *end, u8 > *type, char **tag, > goto err_free_lockers; > } > > - *type = ceph_decode_8(p); > + ret = -EINVAL; > + ceph_decode_8_safe(p, end, *type, err_free_lockers); > s = ceph_extract_encoded_string(p, end, NULL, GFP_NOIO); > if (IS_ERR(s)) { > ret = PTR_ERR(s); > @@ -320,6 +321,8 @@ static int decode_lockers(void **p, void *end, u8 > *type, char **tag, > *tag = s; > return 0; > > +err_inval: > + return -EINVAL; > err_free_lockers: > ceph_free_lockers(*lockers, *num_lockers); > return ret; Looks good. Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com> Thanks, Slava. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ceph: fix OOB read in decode_lockers() via missing bounds check 2026-05-26 19:04 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko 2026-05-28 13:25 ` [PATCH v2] ceph: fix bare ceph_decode_8 OOB in decode_lockers() Pavitra Jha @ 2026-05-28 14:36 ` Pavitra Jha 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Pavitra Jha @ 2026-05-28 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ceph-devel; +Cc: linux-kernel, stable, idryomov, Slava.Dubeyko, amarkuze The follow-up patch titled: "[PATCH v2] ceph: fix bare ceph_decode_8 OOB in decode_lockers()" was intended as the continuation of this review thread and addresses the additional bare decode site pointed out by Slava here: *type = ceph_decode_8(p); I accidentally sent it as a separate thread instead of a reply to this discussion. Thanks, Pavitra ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-02 16:46 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-05-23 1:46 [PATCH] ceph: fix OOB read in decode_lockers() via missing bounds check Pavitra Jha 2026-05-26 19:04 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko 2026-05-28 13:25 ` [PATCH v2] ceph: fix bare ceph_decode_8 OOB in decode_lockers() Pavitra Jha 2026-05-28 18:06 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko 2026-05-30 17:46 ` Dan Carpenter 2026-06-02 4:17 ` [PATCH v3] ceph: fix two unsafe bare decodes " Pavitra Jha 2026-06-02 16:46 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko 2026-05-28 14:36 ` [PATCH] ceph: fix OOB read in decode_lockers() via missing bounds check Pavitra Jha
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome