mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
	Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix refcnt and other cleanups
Date: Mon,  1 Jun 2026 10:01:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260601170114.173359-3-zide.chen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601170114.173359-1-zide.chen@intel.com>

Fix typo UNCORE_BOX_FLAG_INITIATED to UNCORE_BOX_FLAG_INITIALIZED.

Rename the 'id' parameter in uncore_box_{ref,unref}() to 'die' to
reflect its actual meaning and be consistent with other functions.

Remove the incorrect atomic_inc(&box->refcnt) from
uncore_pci_pmu_register(): PCI boxes are not tracked by refcnt,
and this call incorrectly increments it on a per-die basis.

Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
---
v2:
- Don't rename pmu->activeboxes and keep its semantics because in
  uncore_pci_remove() path, uncore_pci_pmu_unregister() won't be
  called for non-active boxes.
- Since pmu->activeboxes keeps it's name, don't need to rename
  box->refcnt to box->cpu_refcnt.
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 11 +++++------
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h |  6 +++---
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index b69b6a21d46b..d759888476c3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -1170,7 +1170,6 @@ static int uncore_pci_pmu_register(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 	if (!box)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	atomic_inc(&box->refcnt);
 	box->dieid = die;
 	box->pci_dev = pdev;
 	box->pmu = pmu;
@@ -1518,7 +1517,7 @@ static void uncore_change_context(struct intel_uncore_type **uncores,
 		uncore_change_type_ctx(*uncores, old_cpu, new_cpu);
 }
 
-static void uncore_box_unref(struct intel_uncore_type **types, int id)
+static void uncore_box_unref(struct intel_uncore_type **types, int die)
 {
 	struct intel_uncore_type *type;
 	struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu;
@@ -1529,7 +1528,7 @@ static void uncore_box_unref(struct intel_uncore_type **types, int id)
 		type = *types;
 		pmu = type->pmus;
 		for (i = 0; i < type->num_boxes; i++, pmu++) {
-			box = pmu->boxes[id];
+			box = pmu->boxes[die];
 			if (box && box->cpu >= 0 && atomic_dec_return(&box->refcnt) == 0)
 				uncore_box_exit(box);
 		}
@@ -1604,14 +1603,14 @@ static int allocate_boxes(struct intel_uncore_type **types,
 }
 
 static int uncore_box_ref(struct intel_uncore_type **types,
-			  int id, unsigned int cpu)
+			  int die, unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct intel_uncore_type *type;
 	struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu;
 	struct intel_uncore_box *box;
 	int i, ret;
 
-	ret = allocate_boxes(types, id, cpu);
+	ret = allocate_boxes(types, die, cpu);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -1619,7 +1618,7 @@ static int uncore_box_ref(struct intel_uncore_type **types,
 		type = *types;
 		pmu = type->pmus;
 		for (i = 0; i < type->num_boxes; i++, pmu++) {
-			box = pmu->boxes[id];
+			box = pmu->boxes[die];
 			if (box && box->cpu >= 0 && atomic_inc_return(&box->refcnt) == 1)
 				uncore_box_init(box);
 		}
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
index c2e5ccb1d72c..bad5d8dec8e0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ struct intel_uncore_box {
 #define CFL_UNC_CBO_7_PERFEVTSEL0		0xf70
 #define CFL_UNC_CBO_7_PER_CTR0			0xf76
 
-#define UNCORE_BOX_FLAG_INITIATED		0
+#define UNCORE_BOX_FLAG_INITIALIZED		0
 /* event config registers are 8-byte apart */
 #define UNCORE_BOX_FLAG_CTL_OFFS8		1
 /* CFL 8th CBOX has different MSR space */
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static inline u64 uncore_read_counter(struct intel_uncore_box *box,
 
 static inline void uncore_box_init(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
 {
-	if (!test_and_set_bit(UNCORE_BOX_FLAG_INITIATED, &box->flags)) {
+	if (!test_and_set_bit(UNCORE_BOX_FLAG_INITIALIZED, &box->flags)) {
 		if (box->pmu->type->ops->init_box)
 			box->pmu->type->ops->init_box(box);
 	}
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ static inline void uncore_box_init(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
 
 static inline void uncore_box_exit(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
 {
-	if (test_and_clear_bit(UNCORE_BOX_FLAG_INITIATED, &box->flags)) {
+	if (test_and_clear_bit(UNCORE_BOX_FLAG_INITIALIZED, &box->flags)) {
 		if (box->pmu->type->ops->exit_box)
 			box->pmu->type->ops->exit_box(box);
 	}
-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-01 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-01 17:01 [PATCH v2 0/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: PMU setup robustness fixes Zide Chen
2026-06-01 17:01 ` [PATCH V2 1/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix PCI PMU cleanup on setup failure Zide Chen
2026-06-02  7:24   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-01 17:01 ` Zide Chen [this message]
2026-06-02  9:52   ` [PATCH V2 2/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix refcnt and other cleanups Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-02 14:16     ` Chen, Zide
2026-06-03  1:13       ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-03 15:09         ` Chen, Zide
2026-06-04  1:00           ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-04 15:41             ` Chen, Zide
2026-06-05  0:30               ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-01 17:01 ` [PATCH V2 3/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Let init_box() callback report failures Zide Chen
2026-06-02  9:57   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-01 17:01 ` [PATCH V2 4/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Keep PCI PMUs working when MMIO/MSR setup fails Zide Chen
2026-06-03  1:24   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-01 17:01 ` [PATCH V2 5/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Factor out box setup code Zide Chen
2026-06-03  1:30   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-01 17:01 ` [PATCH V2 6/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Introduce PMU flags and broken state Zide Chen
2026-06-03  2:13   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-03 15:46     ` Chen, Zide
2026-06-04  1:15       ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-01 17:01 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix uncore_box ref/unref ordering on CPU hotplug Zide Chen
2026-06-03  2:32   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-03 16:40     ` Chen, Zide
2026-06-04  1:16       ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-01 17:01 ` [PATCH V2 8/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Implement lazy setup for MSR/MMIO PMU Zide Chen
2026-06-03  2:43   ` Mi, Dapeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260601170114.173359-3-zide.chen@intel.com \
    --to=zide.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome