Re: [PATCH V2 7/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix uncore_box ref/unref ordering on CPU hotplug

["Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>]

On 6/2/2026 1:01 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
> In uncore_event_cpu_online(), uncore_box_ref() was called before
> uncore_change_context().  uncore_box_ref() gates on box->cpu >= 0,
> but box->cpu is still -1 at that point because uncore_change_context()
> has not run yet.  As a result, the box is never initialized on the
> first CPU to come online in a die, leaving it permanently
> uninitialized in the single-CPU-per-die case.
>
> Thus, box->refcnt is one count below the true value, and in the CPU
> offline path, the box will be torn down on the second-to-last CPU.
>
> In uncore_event_cpu_offline(), uncore_box_unref() was called after
> uncore_change_context(), so box->cpu is already -1 when the collector
> CPU goes offline, which prevents it from tearing down the box.
>
> Fix by swapping the call order in both paths so that
> uncore_box_{ref,unref}() runs at the point where box->cpu reflects
> the correct context.
>
> Fixes: c74443d92f68 ("perf/x86/uncore: Support per PMU cpumask")
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> index f2cb3fde2dda..6d710aef52ac 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> @@ -1577,9 +1577,15 @@ static int uncore_event_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>  	int die, target;
>  
> +	/* Clear the references */
> +	die = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
> +	uncore_box_unref(uncore_msr_uncores, die);
> +	uncore_box_unref(uncore_mmio_uncores, die);
> +
>  	/* Check if exiting cpu is used for collecting uncore events */
>  	if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &uncore_cpu_mask))
> -		goto unref;
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	/* Find a new cpu to collect uncore events */
>  	target = cpumask_any_but(topology_die_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
>  
> @@ -1592,16 +1598,10 @@ static int uncore_event_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>  	uncore_change_context(uncore_msr_uncores, cpu, target);
>  	uncore_change_context(uncore_mmio_uncores, cpu, target);
>  	uncore_change_context(uncore_pci_uncores, cpu, target);
> -
> -unref:
> -	/* Clear the references */
> -	die = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
> -	uncore_box_unref(uncore_msr_uncores, die);
> -	uncore_box_unref(uncore_mmio_uncores, die);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int allocate_boxes(struct intel_uncore_type **types,
> +static void allocate_boxes(struct intel_uncore_type **types,
>  			 unsigned int die, unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>  	struct intel_uncore_box *box, *tmp;
> @@ -1618,8 +1618,10 @@ static int allocate_boxes(struct intel_uncore_type **types,
>  			if (pmu->boxes[die] || uncore_pmu_broken(pmu))
>  				continue;
>  			box = uncore_alloc_box(type, cpu_to_node(cpu));
> -			if (!box)
> +			if (!box) {
> +				uncore_pmu_set_broken(pmu);
>  				goto cleanup;
> +			}
>  			box->pmu = pmu;
>  			box->dieid = die;
>  			list_add(&box->active_list, &allocated);
> @@ -1630,14 +1632,13 @@ static int allocate_boxes(struct intel_uncore_type **types,
>  		list_del_init(&box->active_list);
>  		box->pmu->boxes[die] = box;
>  	}
> -	return 0;
> +	return;
>  
>  cleanup:
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(box, tmp, &allocated, active_list) {
>  		list_del_init(&box->active_list);
>  		kfree(box);
>  	}
> -	return -ENOMEM;
>  }
>  
>  static int uncore_box_ref(struct intel_uncore_type **types,
> @@ -1646,11 +1647,7 @@ static int uncore_box_ref(struct intel_uncore_type **types,
>  	struct intel_uncore_type *type;
>  	struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu;
>  	struct intel_uncore_box *box;
> -	int i, ret;
> -
> -	ret = allocate_boxes(types, die, cpu);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	for (; *types; types++) {
>  		type = *types;
> @@ -1666,27 +1663,26 @@ static int uncore_box_ref(struct intel_uncore_type **types,
>  
>  static int uncore_event_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> -	int die, target, msr_ret, mmio_ret;
> +	int die, target;
>  
>  	die = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
> -	msr_ret = uncore_box_ref(uncore_msr_uncores, die, cpu);
> -	mmio_ret = uncore_box_ref(uncore_mmio_uncores, die, cpu);
> +	allocate_boxes(uncore_msr_uncores, die, cpu);
> +	allocate_boxes(uncore_mmio_uncores, die, cpu);

allocate_boxes() are moved to uncore_event_cpu_online() from
uncore_box_ref(). It's a significant and good change since PCI uncore PMUs
doesn't call allocate_boxes(), but the commit message doesn't mention this.
We'd better extract this change to a separate patch which would make the
changes clearer. Thanks.

Others look good to me.


>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Check if there is an online cpu in the package
>  	 * which collects uncore events already.
>  	 */
>  	target = cpumask_any_and(&uncore_cpu_mask, topology_die_cpumask(cpu));
> -	if (target < nr_cpu_ids)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &uncore_cpu_mask);
> -
> -	if (!msr_ret)
> +	if (target >= nr_cpu_ids) {
> +		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &uncore_cpu_mask);
>  		uncore_change_context(uncore_msr_uncores, -1, cpu);
> -	if (!mmio_ret)
>  		uncore_change_context(uncore_mmio_uncores, -1, cpu);
> -	uncore_change_context(uncore_pci_uncores, -1, cpu);
> +		uncore_change_context(uncore_pci_uncores, -1, cpu);
> +	}
> +
> +	uncore_box_ref(uncore_msr_uncores, die, cpu);
> +	uncore_box_ref(uncore_mmio_uncores, die, cpu);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>