* [PATCH v2] lib/vsprintf: Make no_hash_pointers take effect early
@ 2026-06-12 3:06 Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-16 12:05 ` Petr Mladek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kaitao Cheng @ 2026-06-12 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Petr Mladek, Steven Rostedt, Andy Shevchenko, Rasmus Villemoes,
Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrew Morton
Cc: linux-kernel, Kaitao Cheng
From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
The no_hash_pointers boot parameter is now handled as an alias for
hash_pointers=never. However, hash_pointers=never only records the
selected mode during early parameter parsing, and no_hash_pointers is
not updated until hash_pointers_finalize() runs later from SLUB init.
This leaves a window during very early boot where %p output is still
hashed even though the user explicitly requested unhashed pointers with
no_hash_pointers or hash_pointers=never.
Set no_hash_pointers as soon as the "never" mode is parsed. The later
hash_pointers_finalize() call still keeps the final policy decision in
one place, but explicit requests to disable pointer hashing now take
effect for early boot users too.
In Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt, the descriptions
of both no_hash_pointers and hash_pointers= are already marked as
[KNL,EARLY], which match the current semantics.
Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
---
Changes in v2 (Andy Shevchenko):
- Add a description of the kernel documentation to the commit log.
Link to v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260610124525.59110-1-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev/
---
lib/vsprintf.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index 4221e95701f9..9d35c84f6c49 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -2361,6 +2361,7 @@ static int __init hash_pointers_mode_parse(char *str)
} else if (strcmp(str, "never") == 0) {
pr_info("Hash pointers mode set to never.\n");
hash_pointers_mode = HASH_PTR_NEVER;
+ no_hash_pointers = true;
} else if (strcmp(str, "always") == 0) {
pr_info("Hash pointers mode set to always.\n");
hash_pointers_mode = HASH_PTR_ALWAYS;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] lib/vsprintf: Make no_hash_pointers take effect early
2026-06-12 3:06 [PATCH v2] lib/vsprintf: Make no_hash_pointers take effect early Kaitao Cheng
@ 2026-06-16 12:05 ` Petr Mladek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Petr Mladek @ 2026-06-16 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kaitao Cheng
Cc: Steven Rostedt, Andy Shevchenko, Rasmus Villemoes,
Sergey Senozhatsky, Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, Kaitao Cheng
On Fri 2026-06-12 11:06:42, Kaitao Cheng wrote:
> From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
>
> The no_hash_pointers boot parameter is now handled as an alias for
> hash_pointers=never. However, hash_pointers=never only records the
> selected mode during early parameter parsing, and no_hash_pointers is
> not updated until hash_pointers_finalize() runs later from SLUB init.
>
> This leaves a window during very early boot where %p output is still
> hashed even though the user explicitly requested unhashed pointers with
> no_hash_pointers or hash_pointers=never.
>
> Set no_hash_pointers as soon as the "never" mode is parsed. The later
> hash_pointers_finalize() call still keeps the final policy decision in
> one place, but explicit requests to disable pointer hashing now take
> effect for early boot users too.
>
> In Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt, the descriptions
> of both no_hash_pointers and hash_pointers= are already marked as
> [KNL,EARLY], which match the current semantics.
>
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -2361,6 +2361,7 @@ static int __init hash_pointers_mode_parse(char *str)
> } else if (strcmp(str, "never") == 0) {
> pr_info("Hash pointers mode set to never.\n");
> hash_pointers_mode = HASH_PTR_NEVER;
> + no_hash_pointers = true;
> } else if (strcmp(str, "always") == 0) {
> pr_info("Hash pointers mode set to always.\n");
> hash_pointers_mode = HASH_PTR_ALWAYS;
Sashiko AI has a good point that we should reset no_hash_pointers to
false by default. It would handle the situation when the parameter
is passed more times on the command line. Aka, the last parameter
wins. See
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612030642.14239-1-kaitao.cheng%40linux.dev
It is not a big deal. But let's do it right when touching this.
Otherwise, the patch makes sense and looks good to me.
Best Regards,
Petr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-16 12:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-12 3:06 [PATCH v2] lib/vsprintf: Make no_hash_pointers take effect early Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-16 12:05 ` Petr Mladek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®