mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
	kprateek.nayak@amd.com, ziqianlu@bytedance.com, tj@kernel.org,
	williams@redhat.com, jkacur@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sched/core: Allow newidle for core-sched
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 14:13:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624122451.583174198@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624121327.190063948@infradead.org>

As reported [1], it is possible for newidle, as called from pick_task_fair(),
to migrate a task that was already selected for the SMT sibling.

That is, in case of core scheduling (pick_next_task()'s restart_multi label),
pick_task() is called for each SMT sibling. Suppose SMT0 picks task A, and SMT1
has no tasks and does newidle, it must not be possible (but currently is) to
migrate A to SMT1 and also select A.

This re-enables newidle balancing for core scheduling.

[1] https://patch.msgid.link/20260603095108.GA1684319@bytedance.com

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c  |    6 ++----
 kernel/sched/sched.h |   15 ++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9942,9 +9942,6 @@ struct task_struct *pick_task_fair(struc
 	return p;
 
 idle:
-	if (sched_core_enabled(rq))
-		return NULL;
-
 	new_tasks = sched_balance_newidle(rq, rf);
 	if (new_tasks < 0)
 		return RETRY_TASK;
@@ -10783,7 +10780,8 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct
 	env->flags &= ~LBF_ALL_PINNED;
 
 	if (task_on_cpu(env->src_rq, p) ||
-	    task_current_donor(env->src_rq, p)) {
+	    task_current_donor(env->src_rq, p) ||
+	    task_on_core(env->src_rq, p)) {
 		schedstat_inc(p->stats.nr_failed_migrations_running);
 		return 0;
 	}
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1570,6 +1570,14 @@ static inline bool task_has_sched_core(s
 	return !!p->core_cookie;
 }
 
+static inline bool task_on_core(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	if (sched_core_disabled())
+		return false;
+
+	return rq->core_pick == p;
+}
+
 #else /* !CONFIG_SCHED_CORE: */
 
 static inline bool sched_core_enabled(struct rq *rq)
@@ -1615,6 +1623,11 @@ static inline bool task_has_sched_core(s
 	return false;
 }
 
+static inline bool task_on_core(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 #endif /* !CONFIG_SCHED_CORE */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
@@ -4131,7 +4144,7 @@ void move_queued_task_locked(struct rq *
 static inline
 bool task_is_pushable(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
 {
-	if (!task_on_cpu(rq, p) &&
+	if (!task_on_cpu(rq, p) && !task_on_core(rq, p) &&
 	    cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &p->cpus_mask))
 		return true;
 



  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-24 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-24 12:13 [PATCH 0/2] sched: Remove sched_class::balance() Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-24 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-06-24 23:56   ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/core: Allow newidle for core-sched K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-25 12:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-25 12:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: Remove sched_class::balance() Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-02 11:49 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Aaron Lu
2026-07-03  3:31   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-19  9:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-19  7:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-19 14:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-19 19:22       ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-20  7:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-20  7:42           ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-20  7:58             ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-20 15:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-20 17:15     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-08-21  7:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-22  9:42       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-21  2:44     ` Aaron Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260624122451.583174198@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    --cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®